Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Unsupervised Machine Learning for Profiling Quiet and Passive Quitting

View through CrossRef
The study aimed to identify employee profiles reflecting combinations of quiet quitting, passive quitting, and work engagement. Using a person-centred approach and unsupervised learning, survey data from 1,040 employees were analysed. Clustering relied on composite indices derived from abbreviated quiet and passive quitting scales and the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9 (UWES-9). Multiple algorithms (k-means, hierarchical clustering, spectral clustering, Gaussian mixture models) were compared, and the optimal solution was selected using separation metrics (Silhouette coefficient, Davies–Bouldin index, Calinski–Harabasz index), information criteria (Bayesian Information Criterion [BIC], Akaike Information Criterion [AIC]), and bootstrap stability (Adjusted Rand Index [ARI]). Four distinct employee profiles emerged, differing in boundaries, exhaustion, and energy. Findings suggest quiet quitting and passive quitting are related but distinct withdrawal mechanisms. The study advances profile-based research on employee withdrawal and highlights implications for targeted human resources (HR) interventions.
Title: Unsupervised Machine Learning for Profiling Quiet and Passive Quitting
Description:
The study aimed to identify employee profiles reflecting combinations of quiet quitting, passive quitting, and work engagement.
Using a person-centred approach and unsupervised learning, survey data from 1,040 employees were analysed.
Clustering relied on composite indices derived from abbreviated quiet and passive quitting scales and the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9 (UWES-9).
Multiple algorithms (k-means, hierarchical clustering, spectral clustering, Gaussian mixture models) were compared, and the optimal solution was selected using separation metrics (Silhouette coefficient, Davies–Bouldin index, Calinski–Harabasz index), information criteria (Bayesian Information Criterion [BIC], Akaike Information Criterion [AIC]), and bootstrap stability (Adjusted Rand Index [ARI]).
Four distinct employee profiles emerged, differing in boundaries, exhaustion, and energy.
Findings suggest quiet quitting and passive quitting are related but distinct withdrawal mechanisms.
The study advances profile-based research on employee withdrawal and highlights implications for targeted human resources (HR) interventions.

Related Results

Quiet Quitting: Impact of Performance and Well-Being
Quiet Quitting: Impact of Performance and Well-Being
This study examines the impact of Employee Well-Being on Employee Performance and Quiet Quitting in the IT sector in India, focusing on the mediating role of Employee Performance a...
Studi Kontribusi Job Satisfaction terhadap Quiet Quitting pada Karyawan Bank X
Studi Kontribusi Job Satisfaction terhadap Quiet Quitting pada Karyawan Bank X
Abstract. The definition of Job Satisfaction is a combination of emotional, physical and environmental situations that cause a person to honestly comment that he is satisfied with ...
The Law of Quitting
The Law of Quitting
<p><span>Throughout life, people enter countless positions of authority and trust in relation to one another and society at large. These positions include, among many o...
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
BACKGROUND As of July 2020, a Web of Science search of “machine learning (ML)” nested within the search of “pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics” yielded over 100...

Back to Top