Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

POLITIK ISLAM MAHATHIR MOHAMMAD DI MALAYSIA DAN SOEHARTO DI INDONESIA

View through CrossRef
This study explains the role and strategy of Malaysia during Mahathir Mohammad era and Indonesia in the Soeharto era in facing their Islamists group opposition. In their early period, these two regimes used an iron cage to defeat their political enemies. Mahathir fought with the power of PAS (Parti Al-Islam Se-Malaysia) which becomes more radical in the early of 1980s; meanwhile, Suharto faced the Islamic extremist groups in the early of 1970s. Mahathir consisted to give enough spaces for competition, Suharto did not want to compromise. In its progress, these two regimes chose softer strategy by playing 'Islamic cards’ due to the double purposes: coopting the opposite and building a better image as an Islamic regime. Hence, the political project of Islamization of Mahathir and Soeharto could not be separated from the problem of domestic political contestation and an effort to look for new legitimacy. Thereby, their Islamic political projects ended differently. Due to the monetary crisis and democratic reforms in 1998 affected the Soeharto regime to step down and make an end to all of the political projects he has designed. On the contrary, the Mahathir regime has successfully survived in facing the similar crisis, so that his pro-Islamic policy has passed off although not as aggressive as in the past. 
Title: POLITIK ISLAM MAHATHIR MOHAMMAD DI MALAYSIA DAN SOEHARTO DI INDONESIA
Description:
This study explains the role and strategy of Malaysia during Mahathir Mohammad era and Indonesia in the Soeharto era in facing their Islamists group opposition.
In their early period, these two regimes used an iron cage to defeat their political enemies.
Mahathir fought with the power of PAS (Parti Al-Islam Se-Malaysia) which becomes more radical in the early of 1980s; meanwhile, Suharto faced the Islamic extremist groups in the early of 1970s.
Mahathir consisted to give enough spaces for competition, Suharto did not want to compromise.
In its progress, these two regimes chose softer strategy by playing 'Islamic cards’ due to the double purposes: coopting the opposite and building a better image as an Islamic regime.
Hence, the political project of Islamization of Mahathir and Soeharto could not be separated from the problem of domestic political contestation and an effort to look for new legitimacy.
Thereby, their Islamic political projects ended differently.
Due to the monetary crisis and democratic reforms in 1998 affected the Soeharto regime to step down and make an end to all of the political projects he has designed.
On the contrary, the Mahathir regime has successfully survived in facing the similar crisis, so that his pro-Islamic policy has passed off although not as aggressive as in the past.
 .

Related Results

MALAYSIA AND MAHATHIR IN THE GLOBAL CHALLENGE
MALAYSIA AND MAHATHIR IN THE GLOBAL CHALLENGE
The aim of this study is to analyze Mahathir’s policy through a historical approach to the political developments and challenges in Malaysia. In addition, the author uses secondary...
HARAPAN MAHATHIR KEPADA PENJAWAT AWAM MALAYSIA BAHARU: ANALISIS UCAPAN TUN DR. MAHATHIR MOHAMAD
HARAPAN MAHATHIR KEPADA PENJAWAT AWAM MALAYSIA BAHARU: ANALISIS UCAPAN TUN DR. MAHATHIR MOHAMAD
Abstract: The purpose of this article is to identify the aspects that Mahathir stressed on his first year of office as the 7th Prime Minister of Malaysia. The focus of this study i...
PENGATURAN PARTAI POLITIK DI INDONESIA
PENGATURAN PARTAI POLITIK DI INDONESIA
Partai politik adalah organisasi yang bersifat nasional dan dibentuk oleh sekelompok warga Negara Indonesia secara sukarela atas dasar kesamaan kehendak dan cita-cita untuk memperj...
ASPEK KE-SOEHARTO-AN DALAM KUMPULAN CERPEN SOEHARTO DALAM CERPEN INDONESIA
ASPEK KE-SOEHARTO-AN DALAM KUMPULAN CERPEN SOEHARTO DALAM CERPEN INDONESIA
This research study aims to describe (1) the forms of Soeharto-related aspectsand (2) ways of expressing those aspects in the anthology of short stories entitledSuharto claim Cerpe...
Nilai Kepimpinan Mahathir Mohamad dari Perspektif Mahasiswa Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI)
Nilai Kepimpinan Mahathir Mohamad dari Perspektif Mahasiswa Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI)
Mahathir Mohamad merupakan pemimpin negara yang berjaya membawa Malaysia ke arah pembangunan sosioekonomi yang pesat. Walau bagaimanapun, pada pemerintahannya sebagai Perdana Mente...
Conference Committee
Conference Committee
Abstract Advisory Committee Prof. Dr. Dwia Ariestina Pulubuhu, MA. (Hasanuddin University, Indonesia) Prof. Dr. Ir....
UAS ILMU POLITIK DAN PENDIDIKAN IPS
UAS ILMU POLITIK DAN PENDIDIKAN IPS
Ilmu Politik dan Pendidikan IPS merupakan dua bidang studi yang penting dalam memahami dan mempengaruhi dinamika politik dan partisipasi warga negara dalam suatu masyarakat. Mata k...
DINASTI POLITIK DI INDONESIA DALAM TINJAUAN FIKIH SIYASAH KONTEMPORER
DINASTI POLITIK DI INDONESIA DALAM TINJAUAN FIKIH SIYASAH KONTEMPORER
Islam has no a complete and ready-made political system and governance, including the discussion about the political dynasty. The phenomenon of political dynasties has occurred in ...

Back to Top