Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

First Successful Deployment of Nonmetallic Casing Strings: A Case History

View through CrossRef
Abstract For the first time, two different sizes of nonmetallic casing strings were installed in water wells to cover shallow potable aquifers. This paper describes the reasons for deployment, planning and design, logistics, operational challenges, lessons learned, and the way forward for this newly deployed technology. In the initial stages of the project, fiberglass-reinforced thermoset resin (RTR) pipes manufactured locally were evaluated in terms of ratings, dimension, and method of connection and feasibility for downhole applications. Two nonmetallic casing strings, 19.7″ and 11″, were selected to be run in hole. Design consideration also included compatibility with available casing running and handling tools to ensure safe and efficient field handling and running. At this stage, carbon steel casings were still needed to connect the nonmetallic casing to the surface wellhead equipment and to the float equipment at the bottom of the string. Specially designed crossovers were manufactured and tested prior to enabling combination of nonmetallic and carbon steel casing. All manufactured casing joints and crossovers were tested based on the best available criteria for the nonmetallic industry. Different challenges were encountered in the design stage, such as overcoming the buoyancy force while running and cementing the nonmetallic casing, all of which to be tackled. Cement slurry design and casing accessories were modified based on the simulations scenarios that were run. These designs were subsequently modified in response to issues, i.e., total losses, encountered while drilling. Successful evaluation of the nonmetallic casing deployment was conducted from multiple aspects, including running efficiency, casing wear, and cement quality. Drillpipe protectors were utilized to reduce the possible casing damage due to wear. The nonmetallic casing joints were connected through crossovers to a top metallic casing and float equipment at bottom. Both casing strings were successfully run to depth and cemented in place. Both casings were pressure tested successfully after performing the logging jobs that indicated the level and quality of cement pumped around the strings. Logs showed no considerable change in both nonmetallic casing thickness. The well was completed with open hole, tested and flowed naturally to surface. A conventional power water injector wellhead was installed before release. The design, review and assessment processes, as well as several lessons learned from the first ever deployment of the nonmetallic casing in a water supply well, are the key takeaways from this paper.
Title: First Successful Deployment of Nonmetallic Casing Strings: A Case History
Description:
Abstract For the first time, two different sizes of nonmetallic casing strings were installed in water wells to cover shallow potable aquifers.
This paper describes the reasons for deployment, planning and design, logistics, operational challenges, lessons learned, and the way forward for this newly deployed technology.
In the initial stages of the project, fiberglass-reinforced thermoset resin (RTR) pipes manufactured locally were evaluated in terms of ratings, dimension, and method of connection and feasibility for downhole applications.
Two nonmetallic casing strings, 19.
7″ and 11″, were selected to be run in hole.
Design consideration also included compatibility with available casing running and handling tools to ensure safe and efficient field handling and running.
At this stage, carbon steel casings were still needed to connect the nonmetallic casing to the surface wellhead equipment and to the float equipment at the bottom of the string.
Specially designed crossovers were manufactured and tested prior to enabling combination of nonmetallic and carbon steel casing.
All manufactured casing joints and crossovers were tested based on the best available criteria for the nonmetallic industry.
Different challenges were encountered in the design stage, such as overcoming the buoyancy force while running and cementing the nonmetallic casing, all of which to be tackled.
Cement slurry design and casing accessories were modified based on the simulations scenarios that were run.
These designs were subsequently modified in response to issues, i.
e.
, total losses, encountered while drilling.
Successful evaluation of the nonmetallic casing deployment was conducted from multiple aspects, including running efficiency, casing wear, and cement quality.
Drillpipe protectors were utilized to reduce the possible casing damage due to wear.
The nonmetallic casing joints were connected through crossovers to a top metallic casing and float equipment at bottom.
Both casing strings were successfully run to depth and cemented in place.
Both casings were pressure tested successfully after performing the logging jobs that indicated the level and quality of cement pumped around the strings.
Logs showed no considerable change in both nonmetallic casing thickness.
The well was completed with open hole, tested and flowed naturally to surface.
A conventional power water injector wellhead was installed before release.
The design, review and assessment processes, as well as several lessons learned from the first ever deployment of the nonmetallic casing in a water supply well, are the key takeaways from this paper.

Related Results

The Casing Cage Concept For Deepwater Structures
The Casing Cage Concept For Deepwater Structures
ABSTRACT This paper introduces the casing cage concept and discusses the feasibility of using a casing cage to provide lateral support to the well system casings ...
Casing Drilling with Retrievable Drilling Assemblies
Casing Drilling with Retrievable Drilling Assemblies
Abstract Retrievable Casing Drilling* tools have been used to drill more than 600,000 ft of hole in over 120 wells encompassing six casing sizes ranging from 4-1/...
Top Drive Casing Running:Challenges and Solutions
Top Drive Casing Running:Challenges and Solutions
Abstract Opportunity to improve rig floor safety, reduce technical casing running risk and reduce cost has motivated operators to utilise the top drive for casing...
Casing Centralization—Planned Compared to Actual: A Kuwait Case Study
Casing Centralization—Planned Compared to Actual: A Kuwait Case Study
Abstract Several reasons can contribute to poor cementation; however, proper casing centralization can lead to uniform mud displacement with cement and can mitigate ...
Dual Casing Section Milling Using High Ratio Section Milling Technology to Achieve Rock to Rock Zonal Isolation
Dual Casing Section Milling Using High Ratio Section Milling Technology to Achieve Rock to Rock Zonal Isolation
Abstract The plug and abandon (P&A) challenges of each well are known to be different. This paper narrates unique challenges faced during the abandonment of a la...
Sustained Casing Pressure in Offshore Producing Wells
Sustained Casing Pressure in Offshore Producing Wells
Abstract A large number of producing wells in the OCS develop undesirable and sometimes potentially dangerous sustained pressure on one or more casing strings of ...
Design of Casing Strings
Design of Casing Strings
Abstract Considerable economy can be effected by designing each casing string individually for the particular set of conditions involved. The paper discusses meth...
Effect of Sand Production on Casing Integrity
Effect of Sand Production on Casing Integrity
Abstract This paper documents an engineering study on sand production and its aftermaths on casing damage. Many wells were converted from production to water inje...

Back to Top