Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Marginal Accuracy of Lithium Disilicate Full‐Coverage Single Crowns Made by Direct and Indirect Digital or Conventional Workflows: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
View through CrossRef
AbstractPurposeSeveral studies have compared digital intraoral scanners and conventional impressions. The accuracy of these two methods in terms of marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns is not well‐established, yet. The purpose of this study was to systematically review available publications on marginal fit of single‐unit, full‐coverage, tooth‐supported lithium disilicate restorations.MethodsPubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Scopus were electronically searched along with a manual search. After critical appraisal, data from selected studies were extracted and mean marginal difference with a 95% confidence interval was calculated. Meta‐analysis of the collected data was conducted using STATA software.ResultsThe meta‐analysis revealed similar marginal gap values in intraoral scanners with conventional groups (p>0.05) and in intraoral scanners with extraoral canners (p>0.05).ConclusionNo significant difference was seen between digital and conventional impressions or intra‐ and extraoral scanners for marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns.
Title: Marginal Accuracy of Lithium Disilicate Full‐Coverage Single Crowns Made by Direct and Indirect Digital or Conventional Workflows: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Description:
AbstractPurposeSeveral studies have compared digital intraoral scanners and conventional impressions.
The accuracy of these two methods in terms of marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns is not well‐established, yet.
The purpose of this study was to systematically review available publications on marginal fit of single‐unit, full‐coverage, tooth‐supported lithium disilicate restorations.
MethodsPubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Scopus were electronically searched along with a manual search.
After critical appraisal, data from selected studies were extracted and mean marginal difference with a 95% confidence interval was calculated.
Meta‐analysis of the collected data was conducted using STATA software.
ResultsThe meta‐analysis revealed similar marginal gap values in intraoral scanners with conventional groups (p>0.
05) and in intraoral scanners with extraoral canners (p>0.
05).
ConclusionNo significant difference was seen between digital and conventional impressions or intra‐ and extraoral scanners for marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns.
Related Results
Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials
Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials
AbstractPurposeTo evaluate the marginal fit of CAD/CAM copings milled from hybrid ceramic (Vita Enamic) blocks and lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) blocks, and to evaluate the ef...
Vertical marginal fit of advanced lithium disilicate crowns: an in- vitro study
Vertical marginal fit of advanced lithium disilicate crowns: an in- vitro study
Abstract
Statement of the problem
The clinical performance of ceramic crowns is influenced by overall marginal adaptation...
Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM-Fabricated Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Crowns with Different Margin Designs: Implications for Digital Dentistry
Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM-Fabricated Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Crowns with Different Margin Designs: Implications for Digital Dentistry
Objective: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of cervical margin design—tangential versus chamfer—on the fracture resistance of monolithic crowns fabricated from l...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Marginal Gap Measurement of Pre-Cemented Metal–Ceramic Crowns: A Systematic Review
Marginal Gap Measurement of Pre-Cemented Metal–Ceramic Crowns: A Systematic Review
Background/Objectives: Metal–ceramic crowns may be constructed using different techniques and coping materials. A systematic review analysing the coping material, method of constru...
In vitro Comparison of the Microhardness of Lithium Disilicate and Monolithic and Multilayered Fixed Prosthodontic Materials
In vitro Comparison of the Microhardness of Lithium Disilicate and Monolithic and Multilayered Fixed Prosthodontic Materials
Micro-hardness is a fundamental property of prosthodontic restorative materials, as it affects their resistance to surface deformation, wear, and long-term clinical performance. Th...
Effect of Milling Protocols on Trueness and Precision of Ceramic Crowns
Effect of Milling Protocols on Trueness and Precision of Ceramic Crowns
AbstractPurposeTo investigate the effect of different milling protocols for different ceramic materials on the trueness and precision of milled ceramic crowns.Materials and Methods...
Microleakage of Lithium Disilicate Crown Margins Finished on Direct Restorative Materials
Microleakage of Lithium Disilicate Crown Margins Finished on Direct Restorative Materials
SUMMARY
Objective: For some esthetic clinical situations, it is necessary to finish crown margins on direct restorative materials to preserve tissue integrity, b...