Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Marginal Accuracy of Lithium Disilicate Full‐Coverage Single Crowns Made by Direct and Indirect Digital or Conventional Workflows: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
View through CrossRef
AbstractPurposeSeveral studies have compared digital intraoral scanners and conventional impressions. The accuracy of these two methods in terms of marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns is not well‐established, yet. The purpose of this study was to systematically review available publications on marginal fit of single‐unit, full‐coverage, tooth‐supported lithium disilicate restorations.MethodsPubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Scopus were electronically searched along with a manual search. After critical appraisal, data from selected studies were extracted and mean marginal difference with a 95% confidence interval was calculated. Meta‐analysis of the collected data was conducted using STATA software.ResultsThe meta‐analysis revealed similar marginal gap values in intraoral scanners with conventional groups (p>0.05) and in intraoral scanners with extraoral canners (p>0.05).ConclusionNo significant difference was seen between digital and conventional impressions or intra‐ and extraoral scanners for marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns.
Title: Marginal Accuracy of Lithium Disilicate Full‐Coverage Single Crowns Made by Direct and Indirect Digital or Conventional Workflows: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Description:
AbstractPurposeSeveral studies have compared digital intraoral scanners and conventional impressions.
The accuracy of these two methods in terms of marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns is not well‐established, yet.
The purpose of this study was to systematically review available publications on marginal fit of single‐unit, full‐coverage, tooth‐supported lithium disilicate restorations.
MethodsPubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Scopus were electronically searched along with a manual search.
After critical appraisal, data from selected studies were extracted and mean marginal difference with a 95% confidence interval was calculated.
Meta‐analysis of the collected data was conducted using STATA software.
ResultsThe meta‐analysis revealed similar marginal gap values in intraoral scanners with conventional groups (p>0.
05) and in intraoral scanners with extraoral canners (p>0.
05).
ConclusionNo significant difference was seen between digital and conventional impressions or intra‐ and extraoral scanners for marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns.
Related Results
Vertical marginal fit of advanced lithium disilicate crowns: an in- vitro study
Vertical marginal fit of advanced lithium disilicate crowns: an in- vitro study
Abstract
Statement of the problem
The clinical performance of ceramic crowns is influenced by overall marginal adaptation...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Effect of Milling Protocols on Trueness and Precision of Ceramic Crowns
Effect of Milling Protocols on Trueness and Precision of Ceramic Crowns
AbstractPurposeTo investigate the effect of different milling protocols for different ceramic materials on the trueness and precision of milled ceramic crowns.Materials and Methods...
Lithium Prospectivity in the Northeast German and Thuringian Ba-sins
Lithium Prospectivity in the Northeast German and Thuringian Ba-sins
Over the years many boreholes have been drilled into the Northeast German Basin (NEGB) in pursuit of the exploration of hydrocarbons. As well as gaining important information regar...
Fit, Precision, and Trueness of 3D-Printed Zirconia Crowns Compared to Milled Counterparts
Fit, Precision, and Trueness of 3D-Printed Zirconia Crowns Compared to Milled Counterparts
Precise fit of a crown and accurate reproduction of the digital design are paramount for successful treatment outcomes and preservation of clinician and technician time. The study ...
Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction
As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
Comparative evaluation of retention of lithium disilicate crowns with four different cementation systems- An in-vitro Study
Comparative evaluation of retention of lithium disilicate crowns with four different cementation systems- An in-vitro Study
AIM OF THE STUDY: This in vitro study was performed to compare the retention of pressable lithium disilicate crowns cemented with four different cementation systems.METHODS: Eighty...
Comparative In vitro Analysis of Characteristics Between CAD-CAM Fabricated Ceramic Crowns and 3D-Printed Resin-Based Dental Crowns
Comparative In vitro Analysis of Characteristics Between CAD-CAM Fabricated Ceramic Crowns and 3D-Printed Resin-Based Dental Crowns
Objectives: Dental crown clinical longevity mainly depends on how materials resist wear and maintain their surface quality. Three-Dimensionally (3D) printed resin-based crowns and ...