Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Introduction

View through CrossRef
Abstract The Democratic Party’s 2008 presidential nomination was supposed to be the inevitable coronation of Hillary Clinton. She was the most well-known candidate; had the most support from the party establishment, and had, by far, the most financial resources. Two big names (Al Gore and John Kerry) considered running, but decided they had no hope of defeating the Clinton machine. That left an unlikely assortment of lesser-knowns: a U.S. Representative from Ohio (Dennis Kucinich), the Governor of New Mexico (Bill Richardson), and several U.S. Senators: Joe Biden (Delaware), John Edwards (North Carolina), Chris Dodd (Connecticut), Mike Gravel (Alaska), and Barack Obama (Illinois). The nomination went off script. Obama was a first-term senator, a black man with an unhelpful name, but he excited voters. He raised enough money to be competitive in the Iowa caucuses and he persuaded Oprah Winfrey to campaign for him. Obama defeated Clinton by eight percentage points in Iowa and the race was on. Obama won the Democratic nomination and, then, the presidential election against Republican John McCain because the Obama campaign had a lot more going for it than Obama’s eloquence and charisma: Big Data. The Obama campaign tried to put every potential voter into its data base, along with hundreds of tidbits of personal information: age, gender, marital status, race, religion, address, occupation, income, car registrations, home value, donation history, magazine subscriptions, leisure activities, Facebook friends, and anything else they could find that seemed relevant. Some data were collected from public data bases, some from e-mail exchanges or campaign workers knocking on front doors. Some data were purchased from private data vendors. Layered on top were weekly telephone surveys of thousands of potential voters which not only gathered personal data, but also attempted to gauge each person’s likelihood of voting—and voting for Obama. These voter likelihoods were correlated statistically with personal characteristics and extrapolated to other potential voters based on their personal characteristics. The campaign’s computer software predicted how likely each person its data base was to vote and the probability that the vote would be for Obama. This data-driven model allowed the campaign to microtarget individuals through e-mails, snail mail, personal visits, and television ads asking for donations and votes.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: Introduction
Description:
Abstract The Democratic Party’s 2008 presidential nomination was supposed to be the inevitable coronation of Hillary Clinton.
She was the most well-known candidate; had the most support from the party establishment, and had, by far, the most financial resources.
Two big names (Al Gore and John Kerry) considered running, but decided they had no hope of defeating the Clinton machine.
That left an unlikely assortment of lesser-knowns: a U.
S.
Representative from Ohio (Dennis Kucinich), the Governor of New Mexico (Bill Richardson), and several U.
S.
Senators: Joe Biden (Delaware), John Edwards (North Carolina), Chris Dodd (Connecticut), Mike Gravel (Alaska), and Barack Obama (Illinois).
The nomination went off script.
Obama was a first-term senator, a black man with an unhelpful name, but he excited voters.
He raised enough money to be competitive in the Iowa caucuses and he persuaded Oprah Winfrey to campaign for him.
Obama defeated Clinton by eight percentage points in Iowa and the race was on.
Obama won the Democratic nomination and, then, the presidential election against Republican John McCain because the Obama campaign had a lot more going for it than Obama’s eloquence and charisma: Big Data.
The Obama campaign tried to put every potential voter into its data base, along with hundreds of tidbits of personal information: age, gender, marital status, race, religion, address, occupation, income, car registrations, home value, donation history, magazine subscriptions, leisure activities, Facebook friends, and anything else they could find that seemed relevant.
Some data were collected from public data bases, some from e-mail exchanges or campaign workers knocking on front doors.
Some data were purchased from private data vendors.
Layered on top were weekly telephone surveys of thousands of potential voters which not only gathered personal data, but also attempted to gauge each person’s likelihood of voting—and voting for Obama.
These voter likelihoods were correlated statistically with personal characteristics and extrapolated to other potential voters based on their personal characteristics.
The campaign’s computer software predicted how likely each person its data base was to vote and the probability that the vote would be for Obama.
This data-driven model allowed the campaign to microtarget individuals through e-mails, snail mail, personal visits, and television ads asking for donations and votes.

Related Results

E-071 Organization of a Neurointerventional Fellowship Curriculum
E-071 Organization of a Neurointerventional Fellowship Curriculum
Introduction The field of Neurointervention has attracted some of the very best physicians across the world. Given the interdisciplinary nature of this specialty,...
Essay Review : Classics in translation
Essay Review : Classics in translation
Balzac, Cousin Bette, translated by Sylvia Raphael with an introduction by David Bellos, 1992; Balzac, Eugénie Grandet, translated by Sylvia Raphael with an introduction by Christo...
Supportive treatment for cancer – Part 3
Supportive treatment for cancer – Part 3
SCIENTIFIC REPORT 10 -- 1 INTRODUCTION 10 -- 1.1 CONTEXT 10 -- 1.2 GENERAL SCOPE 11 -- 1.3 TARGET USERS OF THE GUIDELINE 11 -- 1.4 STATEMENT OF INTENT 12 -- 1.5 FUNDING AND DECLARA...
ANALYZING THE RHYTHM OF NARRATION IN THE MAIN INTRODUCTION OF 'MEM AND ZIN' BY AHMAD KHANI ACCORDING TO GÉRARD GENETTE'S CONCEPT OF TIME
ANALYZING THE RHYTHM OF NARRATION IN THE MAIN INTRODUCTION OF 'MEM AND ZIN' BY AHMAD KHANI ACCORDING TO GÉRARD GENETTE'S CONCEPT OF TIME
This study, titled "Analyzing the Rhythm of Narration in the Main Introduction of 'Mem and Zin' by Ahmad Khani According to Gérard Genette's Concept of Time," is a comprehensive an...
Évaluation de l’introduction du vaccin anti-haemophilus influenzae en Côte d’Ivoire
Évaluation de l’introduction du vaccin anti-haemophilus influenzae en Côte d’Ivoire
Introduction : La Côte d’Ivoire a introduit le vaccin anti-Haemophilus Influenzae type b dans son programme élargi de vaccination en mars 2009. À la suite de cette introduction, ...
Variation in behavioural traits and their molecular basis in the globally invasive Argentine ant
Variation in behavioural traits and their molecular basis in the globally invasive Argentine ant
<p>A salient question in invasion biology is to elucidate what traits make some species invasive and not others. Recently, the introduction process has been hypothesised to f...

Back to Top