Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Blanchot, Maurice (1907–2003)

View through CrossRef
Maurice Blanchot was one of Europe’s most influential essayists, theorists and experimental fiction writers. Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, Paul de Man, Jacques Derrida and Emmanuel Levinas, notably, represent the major theorists of the second half of the last century who are indebted to Blanchot’s highly original – if not enigmatic – oeuvre. Throughout his life, Blanchot sought to minimize his status as a public figure and at times isolated himself from friends and colleagues. Blanchot’s modernism emphasizes the radical singularity of the artist’s production: the work of art completely thwarts all attempts to subsume it according to some pre-established universal category or identity. For Blanchot, écriture – art in its most indeterminate form – is an expression not of an author who actively and deliberately conceives and creates; rather, it is a reflection of an experience of radical passivity, the futile and always incomplete struggle with mortal existence. The work of art abandons the artist, the poet, the writer, to a state of permanent dislocation and exile. The nomadic nature of the artist’s experience testifies – in accentuated form – to the subject in general. Blanchot speaks famously of la communauté inavouable – the unavow-able or unworkable character of the community that is to come. Though this idea might suggest paralysis, it also speaks to the futility of all totalitarian aspirations. The radical heterogeneity of existence entails the inexhaustibility of humanity’s personal, social and political endeavours.
Title: Blanchot, Maurice (1907–2003)
Description:
Maurice Blanchot was one of Europe’s most influential essayists, theorists and experimental fiction writers.
Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, Paul de Man, Jacques Derrida and Emmanuel Levinas, notably, represent the major theorists of the second half of the last century who are indebted to Blanchot’s highly original – if not enigmatic – oeuvre.
Throughout his life, Blanchot sought to minimize his status as a public figure and at times isolated himself from friends and colleagues.
Blanchot’s modernism emphasizes the radical singularity of the artist’s production: the work of art completely thwarts all attempts to subsume it according to some pre-established universal category or identity.
For Blanchot, écriture – art in its most indeterminate form – is an expression not of an author who actively and deliberately conceives and creates; rather, it is a reflection of an experience of radical passivity, the futile and always incomplete struggle with mortal existence.
The work of art abandons the artist, the poet, the writer, to a state of permanent dislocation and exile.
The nomadic nature of the artist’s experience testifies – in accentuated form – to the subject in general.
Blanchot speaks famously of la communauté inavouable – the unavow-able or unworkable character of the community that is to come.
Though this idea might suggest paralysis, it also speaks to the futility of all totalitarian aspirations.
The radical heterogeneity of existence entails the inexhaustibility of humanity’s personal, social and political endeavours.

Related Results

Maurice Blanchot
Maurice Blanchot
Maurice Blanchot (b. 1907–d. 2003) is a profoundly unique and influential figure of the 20th century. Sitting between philosophy and literature, his work explores the philosophical...
Maurice Blanchot et la philosophie
Maurice Blanchot et la philosophie
Dans Le Pas au-delà, Maurice Blanchot fait le constat suivant : « Derrière le discours parle le refus de discourir, comme derrière la philosophie parlerait le refus de philosopher ...
The Uses of Maurice Blanchot in Bernard Stiegler's Technics and Time
The Uses of Maurice Blanchot in Bernard Stiegler's Technics and Time
This article argues that Maurice Blanchot is a significant presence in Bernard Stiegler's Technics and Time series. The article first sets out Stiegler's invocation of the Blanchot...
Traduire jusqu’au point de non-pouvoir : approche de l’engagement blanchotien
Traduire jusqu’au point de non-pouvoir : approche de l’engagement blanchotien
In the early 60’s, Blanchot participated with a group of European intellectuals in the process of conceptualizing an international journal based on translation. In our intent to in...
A Same Other, Another Same: Walter Benjamin and Maurice Blanchot on Translation
A Same Other, Another Same: Walter Benjamin and Maurice Blanchot on Translation
Even though Walter Benjamin and Maurice Blanchot count among the most important literary critics of the past century and shared many concerns, they have rarely been considered toge...
Maurice Blanchot, entre roman et récit
Maurice Blanchot, entre roman et récit
Le 14 septembre 2011, dans l’émission de Laure Adler Hors champ sur France Culture, Jean-Luc Godard tenait les propos suivants : « Question : Expliquez-nous la différence entre du ...
Blanchot and Affinity
Blanchot and Affinity
This chapter focuses on Davis’s literary relationship with Maurice Blanchot. She began translating Blanchot early on in her career and some of her stories can be seen to respond to...
La question de la nomination dans l’œuvre de Maurice Blanchot
La question de la nomination dans l’œuvre de Maurice Blanchot
Qu’est-ce que lire ? Qu’est-ce qu’écrire ? Ou plus généralement, qu’est-ce que la littérature et comment se ‘fabrique’-t-elle ? Ce sont les questions qui obsèdent Maurice Blanchot ...

Back to Top