Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Uses of Maurice Blanchot in Bernard Stiegler's Technics and Time

View through CrossRef
This article argues that Maurice Blanchot is a significant presence in Bernard Stiegler's Technics and Time series. The article first sets out Stiegler's invocation of the Blanchotian ‘change of epoch’ in the first volume, which attempts to situate Blanchot within the horizon of technics. I argue Blanchot's disaster is a hidden element in Stiegler's play on the motifs of the star and catastrophe. The article then traces how these motifs emerge in the second and third volumes, in which the technical forms of photography and cinema become more important and where the motifs are woven together through reference to works by Roland Barthes, D. W. Winnicott and Federico Fellini. Stiegler filters these references to apparently disparate figures through Blanchot's analyses of writing and temporality. Tracing both overt and unacknowledged references to Blanchot in Stiegler's text, I conclude that Stiegler's use of Blanchot destabilizes his conceptions of time and epochality.
Edinburgh University Press
Title: The Uses of Maurice Blanchot in Bernard Stiegler's Technics and Time
Description:
This article argues that Maurice Blanchot is a significant presence in Bernard Stiegler's Technics and Time series.
The article first sets out Stiegler's invocation of the Blanchotian ‘change of epoch’ in the first volume, which attempts to situate Blanchot within the horizon of technics.
I argue Blanchot's disaster is a hidden element in Stiegler's play on the motifs of the star and catastrophe.
The article then traces how these motifs emerge in the second and third volumes, in which the technical forms of photography and cinema become more important and where the motifs are woven together through reference to works by Roland Barthes, D.
W.
Winnicott and Federico Fellini.
Stiegler filters these references to apparently disparate figures through Blanchot's analyses of writing and temporality.
Tracing both overt and unacknowledged references to Blanchot in Stiegler's text, I conclude that Stiegler's use of Blanchot destabilizes his conceptions of time and epochality.

Related Results

Maurice Blanchot
Maurice Blanchot
Maurice Blanchot (b. 1907–d. 2003) is a profoundly unique and influential figure of the 20th century. Sitting between philosophy and literature, his work explores the philosophical...
Stiegler, Philosopher
Stiegler, Philosopher
Bernard Stiegler’s prolific career consisted both in philosophical reflection and concrete political interventions. In this article, Stiegler’s project in Technics and Time is re-e...
Collective Disindividuation and/or Barbarism: Technics and Proletarianization
Collective Disindividuation and/or Barbarism: Technics and Proletarianization
This essay serves as an overview of Bernard Stiegler’s project by offering a critical examination of “(de)proletarianization” and the pharmakon as refracted through his writings on...
Technics, Time and the Internation: Bernard Stiegler’s Thought – A Dialogue with Daniel Ross
Technics, Time and the Internation: Bernard Stiegler’s Thought – A Dialogue with Daniel Ross
This interview with Bernard Stiegler’s long-time translator and collaborator, Daniel Ross, examines the connections between different periods of Stiegler’s work, thought, writing a...
Penser l’image de la pensée avec Bernard Stiegler
Penser l’image de la pensée avec Bernard Stiegler
L’article vise à proposer une lecture générale de la pensée de Bernard Stiegler, destinée à mettre en évidence ses caractéristiques théoriques les plus novatrices. L’idée de base e...
Blanchot, Maurice (1907–2003)
Blanchot, Maurice (1907–2003)
Maurice Blanchot was one of Europe’s most influential essayists, theorists and experimental fiction writers. Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, Paul de Man, Jacques Derrida and Emman...
Maurice Blanchot et la philosophie
Maurice Blanchot et la philosophie
Dans Le Pas au-delà, Maurice Blanchot fait le constat suivant : « Derrière le discours parle le refus de discourir, comme derrière la philosophie parlerait le refus de philosopher ...
Traduire jusqu’au point de non-pouvoir : approche de l’engagement blanchotien
Traduire jusqu’au point de non-pouvoir : approche de l’engagement blanchotien
In the early 60’s, Blanchot participated with a group of European intellectuals in the process of conceptualizing an international journal based on translation. In our intent to in...

Back to Top