Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Comparative Analysis of the 1915 and 1919 Versions of Symphony No. 5 in E-flat Major, op. 82 by Jean Sibelius

View through CrossRef
The initial composition of the Fifth Symphony in E-flat Major, Op. 82 was undertaken as a commission to celebrate the composer's fiftieth birthday. Unhappy with the initial efforts, two revisions were then performed; the first was in 1916 and the final revision in 1919. Despite the larger form of the work seeming to have been changed between the 1915 and 1919 versions, the smaller gestures of thematic expression in both versions remained similar. On the surface, it had appeared that the composer had eliminated a movement, changing the 1919 version into a three movement form. This view was not challenged by the composer at the time, and since the earlier versions had either been withdrawn or destroyed, there was no way to compare the original efforts to the final product until recently. In comparing the 1919 version to the original, a definite strong parallel can be seen between the two - despite the changes to form, rearrangement of melodic material, and the seemingly different number of movements. However, the parallel is enough that the 1915 version can be a guide to classifying the 1919 version, an act that has eluded many scholars since the 1920s. Most importantly, comparing the two versions shows that the 1919 version is not a three movement form at all; it is a four movement form that is obscured by the connection of the first and second movements by a thematic bridge that contains elements from both movements, but is not placed within either structure.
University of North Texas Libraries
Title: A Comparative Analysis of the 1915 and 1919 Versions of Symphony No. 5 in E-flat Major, op. 82 by Jean Sibelius
Description:
The initial composition of the Fifth Symphony in E-flat Major, Op.
82 was undertaken as a commission to celebrate the composer's fiftieth birthday.
Unhappy with the initial efforts, two revisions were then performed; the first was in 1916 and the final revision in 1919.
Despite the larger form of the work seeming to have been changed between the 1915 and 1919 versions, the smaller gestures of thematic expression in both versions remained similar.
On the surface, it had appeared that the composer had eliminated a movement, changing the 1919 version into a three movement form.
This view was not challenged by the composer at the time, and since the earlier versions had either been withdrawn or destroyed, there was no way to compare the original efforts to the final product until recently.
In comparing the 1919 version to the original, a definite strong parallel can be seen between the two - despite the changes to form, rearrangement of melodic material, and the seemingly different number of movements.
However, the parallel is enough that the 1915 version can be a guide to classifying the 1919 version, an act that has eluded many scholars since the 1920s.
Most importantly, comparing the two versions shows that the 1919 version is not a three movement form at all; it is a four movement form that is obscured by the connection of the first and second movements by a thematic bridge that contains elements from both movements, but is not placed within either structure.

Related Results

Sibelius (1965)
Sibelius (1965)
Abstract AALTONEN: Mr Britten, as a composer you are master of a variety of branches of music. Would you please tell us which one you prefer working in?BRITTEN: I th...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
A Comparative Analysis of the Orchestral and Piano Versions of Finlandia by Jean Sibelius in Relation to His Compositional Style, 1899–1904
A Comparative Analysis of the Orchestral and Piano Versions of Finlandia by Jean Sibelius in Relation to His Compositional Style, 1899–1904
While he was composing his important orchestral tone poem Finlandia in 1899–1900, Jean Sibelius (1865–1957) made his own piano arrangement of it. The purpose of this study is to co...
Sibelius: Symphony No. 5
Sibelius: Symphony No. 5
Sibelius's Fifth is one of the great late-Romantic symphonies. In this searching account, based on a wealth of new information, James Hepokoski takes a fresh look at the work and i...
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Context Camera updated in-flight calibration
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Context Camera updated in-flight calibration
Introduction: The Context Camera (CTX) has so far delivered more than 145,000 images [1]. The images are one of the most popular datasets for planetary geologists, providing extens...
IMPLEMENTASI MATA PELAJARAN SIMULASI DIGITAL MENGGUNAKAN SIBELIUS DI JURUSAN SENI MUSIK KLASIK SMKN 12 SURABAYA
IMPLEMENTASI MATA PELAJARAN SIMULASI DIGITAL MENGGUNAKAN SIBELIUS DI JURUSAN SENI MUSIK KLASIK SMKN 12 SURABAYA
Simulasi Digital merupakan salah satu mata pelajaran yang ada pada jurusan Seni Musik Klasik SMK Negeri 12. Mata pelajaran Simulasi Digital mempelajari tentang penulisan aransemen ...
The Songs of Jean Sibelius
The Songs of Jean Sibelius
A landmark in Sibelius scholarship, this is the first book that presents all of Sibelius's solo art songs in their musical and aesthetic context. Indispensable for scholars and per...

Back to Top