Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Mengapa Ipv6 Gagal ?
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACTIPv6 was introduced to replace IPv4 as the main IP address. However, despite being more than 15 years since itsstandardization, IPv6 failed to achieve any meaningful diffusion through the Internet. While previous researchhas debated, discussed and explored the IPv6 adoption, this study provides a theoretical perspective to investigatethe failure of IPv6 to diffuse from resistance perspective. Drawing on Tornatzky and Fleischer’s TOE (Technology-Organization-Environment) framework and integrating prior adoption and resistance literatures, we propose amodel of IPv6 resistance. The antecedents of the proposed model basically represent three dimensions of TOEframework including Technological context (lack of need, satisfaction with current system, switching cost andperceived of threat), Organizational context (resource barrier and IT sophistication) and Environmental context(regulatory support). Furthermore, the model can be used to explore and recognize why most of organization asend user still resist over the IPv6.Keywords: IPv6, resistance technology, adoption technologyABSTRAKIPv6 diperkenalkan untuk menggantikan IPv4 sebagai protocol pengalamatan utama di Internet. Tetapi meskipuntelah lebih dari 15 tahun ditetapkan sebagai standard, IPv6 gagal mencapai difusi yang berarti. Sementarapenelitian sebelumnya telah memperdebatkan, membahas dan mengeksplorasi adopsi IPv6, penelitian inimemberikan perspektif teoritis untuk menyelidiki kegagalan IPv6 untuk menyebar dari perspektif resistansi.Menggunakan kerangka kerja Tornatzky & Fleischer's TOE (Technology-Organization-Environment) danintegrasi dengan literatur adopsi dan resistensi sebelumnya, kami mengusulkan sebuah model resistensi IPv6.Antescedent dari model yang diusulkan pada dasarnya mewakili tiga dimensi kerangka TOE termasuk konteksTeknologi (lack of need, satisfaction with current system, switching cost and perceived of threat), konteksorganisasi ((resource barrier and IT sophistication) dan konteks lingkungan (regulatory support). Selanjutnya,model tersebut dapat digunakan untuk mengeksplorasi dan mengenali mengapa sebagian besar organisasi masihmenolak IPv6.Keywords: IPv6, penolakan teknologi, adopsi teknologi
Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya
Title: Mengapa Ipv6 Gagal ?
Description:
ABSTRACTIPv6 was introduced to replace IPv4 as the main IP address.
However, despite being more than 15 years since itsstandardization, IPv6 failed to achieve any meaningful diffusion through the Internet.
While previous researchhas debated, discussed and explored the IPv6 adoption, this study provides a theoretical perspective to investigatethe failure of IPv6 to diffuse from resistance perspective.
Drawing on Tornatzky and Fleischer’s TOE (Technology-Organization-Environment) framework and integrating prior adoption and resistance literatures, we propose amodel of IPv6 resistance.
The antecedents of the proposed model basically represent three dimensions of TOEframework including Technological context (lack of need, satisfaction with current system, switching cost andperceived of threat), Organizational context (resource barrier and IT sophistication) and Environmental context(regulatory support).
Furthermore, the model can be used to explore and recognize why most of organization asend user still resist over the IPv6.
Keywords: IPv6, resistance technology, adoption technologyABSTRAKIPv6 diperkenalkan untuk menggantikan IPv4 sebagai protocol pengalamatan utama di Internet.
Tetapi meskipuntelah lebih dari 15 tahun ditetapkan sebagai standard, IPv6 gagal mencapai difusi yang berarti.
Sementarapenelitian sebelumnya telah memperdebatkan, membahas dan mengeksplorasi adopsi IPv6, penelitian inimemberikan perspektif teoritis untuk menyelidiki kegagalan IPv6 untuk menyebar dari perspektif resistansi.
Menggunakan kerangka kerja Tornatzky & Fleischer's TOE (Technology-Organization-Environment) danintegrasi dengan literatur adopsi dan resistensi sebelumnya, kami mengusulkan sebuah model resistensi IPv6.
Antescedent dari model yang diusulkan pada dasarnya mewakili tiga dimensi kerangka TOE termasuk konteksTeknologi (lack of need, satisfaction with current system, switching cost and perceived of threat), konteksorganisasi ((resource barrier and IT sophistication) dan konteks lingkungan (regulatory support).
Selanjutnya,model tersebut dapat digunakan untuk mengeksplorasi dan mengenali mengapa sebagian besar organisasi masihmenolak IPv6.
Keywords: IPv6, penolakan teknologi, adopsi teknologi.
Related Results
IPv6 implementation strategies: Insights from the telecommunication and finance sectors
IPv6 implementation strategies: Insights from the telecommunication and finance sectors
The transition from IPv4 to IPv6 is a critical evolution in network infrastructure, driven by the exhaustion of IPv4 addresses and the growing demand for enhanced connectivity. Thi...
Implementasi Network Monitoring Dengan Ntop Pada Jaringan DualStack
Implementasi Network Monitoring Dengan Ntop Pada Jaringan DualStack
Untukbisa terhubung ke internet, maka dibutuhkan komponen penting dalam jaringan komputer yaitu Internet Protocol (IP). Seiring dengan perkembangan teknologi, IP terbagi menjadi 2 ...
Introducción a IPv6
Introducción a IPv6
Introducción a IPv6
Introduction to IPv6
Edwin Salazar Vega
Universidad Nacional de Piura
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33017/RevECIPeru2011.0023/
RESUMEN
Como es de conocimiento p...
Contributions to IPv6 support over low rate low power wireless networks
Contributions to IPv6 support over low rate low power wireless networks
(English) The main objective of this thesis is contributing to IPv6 support over Low Rate Low Power Wireless Networks (LRLPWNs). One family of LRLPWNs is Low Power Wide Area Networ...
Diffusion and Adoption of IPv6 in the Arin Region
Diffusion and Adoption of IPv6 in the Arin Region
In the near term there will be no available, unallocated IPv4 addresses. From original estimates of IPv4 exhaustion in 2037, the most widely-cited current estimates for ARIN IPv4 a...
Comparative Study of a Router Performance with IPv4 and IPv6 Traffic
Comparative Study of a Router Performance with IPv4 and IPv6 Traffic
Because of the growth of the number of devices that use the internet, the number of available IPv4 addresses has run out in most parts of the world. IPv6 was created to solve this ...
INTEGRASI IPV6 DI IPV4 PADA JARINGAN LAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE TUNNELING IPV6IP
INTEGRASI IPV6 DI IPV4 PADA JARINGAN LAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE TUNNELING IPV6IP
Internet merupakan jaringan terluas dalam sistem teknologi informasi yang memungkinkanmasyarakat di seluruh dunia untuk saling terhubung. jaringan internet yang dapat diakses publi...
Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols On IPv4 and IPv6 Addressing Networks
Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols On IPv4 and IPv6 Addressing Networks
With IPv4 addresses being exhausted, network engineers and researchers are encouraged to adopt IPv6. But before using the IPv6 network directly, engineers need to test their hardwa...

