Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Reduction in procedure duration when utilizing active esophageal cooling in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation - update from a large hospital registry
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.
Background
During left atrial ablation, lesions may be placed on the posterior wall of the left atrium. Due to the anatomical proximity of the left atrium to the esophagus, there is significant risk for thermal esophageal injury and potentially atrio-esophageal fistula. Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may involve even more lesion placement, and increased risk and procedure time as a result. In order to protect the esophagus, there are two main methods of esophageal protection, luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring and active esophageal cooling. Recent studies have compared LET monitoring to active cooling and found a reduction in overall esophageal injury when utilizing active cooling, in addition to a reduction in procedure time. However, these studies generally included all patients with AF regardless of which type.
Purpose
We aimed to investigate the association between procedure duration and esophageal protection method among persistent AF patients.
Methods
In this study, we obtained data from an existing clinician-maintained hospital registry. We collected procedure durations from patients with persistent AF undergoing left atrial ablation from January 2018 to May 2022. All patients that met these criteria were included.
Results
Data were analyzed from 161 patients. Active esophageal cooling was utilized in 90 procedures, while LET monitoring was utilized in 71 procedures. The median procedure duration in the actively cooled group was 146 minutes with an interquartile range (IQR) of 58. The median procedure duration in the LET monitored group was 173 minutes with an IQR of 60. This represents a median difference of 27 minutes or 16% of the total procedure duration (p<.001)
Conclusions
The use of active esophageal cooling is associated with a significant reduction in overall procedure time among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Title: Reduction in procedure duration when utilizing active esophageal cooling in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation - update from a large hospital registry
Description:
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only.
Main funding source(s): National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.
Background
During left atrial ablation, lesions may be placed on the posterior wall of the left atrium.
Due to the anatomical proximity of the left atrium to the esophagus, there is significant risk for thermal esophageal injury and potentially atrio-esophageal fistula.
Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may involve even more lesion placement, and increased risk and procedure time as a result.
In order to protect the esophagus, there are two main methods of esophageal protection, luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring and active esophageal cooling.
Recent studies have compared LET monitoring to active cooling and found a reduction in overall esophageal injury when utilizing active cooling, in addition to a reduction in procedure time.
However, these studies generally included all patients with AF regardless of which type.
Purpose
We aimed to investigate the association between procedure duration and esophageal protection method among persistent AF patients.
Methods
In this study, we obtained data from an existing clinician-maintained hospital registry.
We collected procedure durations from patients with persistent AF undergoing left atrial ablation from January 2018 to May 2022.
All patients that met these criteria were included.
Results
Data were analyzed from 161 patients.
Active esophageal cooling was utilized in 90 procedures, while LET monitoring was utilized in 71 procedures.
The median procedure duration in the actively cooled group was 146 minutes with an interquartile range (IQR) of 58.
The median procedure duration in the LET monitored group was 173 minutes with an IQR of 60.
This represents a median difference of 27 minutes or 16% of the total procedure duration (p<.
001)
Conclusions
The use of active esophageal cooling is associated with a significant reduction in overall procedure time among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Related Results
Significant procedure length reduction when utilizing active esophageal cooling – a six-year single center study
Significant procedure length reduction when utilizing active esophageal cooling – a six-year single center study
Abstract
Background
A number of factors can influence procedure duration of left atrial ablation for the treatment of atrial fib...
ASSA13-03-9 Decreased Expression of Small-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels SK1, SK2, and SK3 in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
ASSA13-03-9 Decreased Expression of Small-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels SK1, SK2, and SK3 in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Background
Small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (SK channels) have been reported involved in atrial fibrillation (AF) as a new ion channel candidates, as ...
Use of an active esophageal cooling device in zero-fluoroscopy settings without intracardiac echocardiography
Use of an active esophageal cooling device in zero-fluoroscopy settings without intracardiac echocardiography
Abstract
Background
Active esophageal cooling is increasingly being utilized during radiofrequency (RF) ablation to achieve pulm...
Inter‐Relationships Between Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation
Inter‐Relationships Between Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation
It has been appreciated for a long time that atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation have a clinical relationship. Now, with the technological advances that permit more sophisticate...
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION CARDIOVERSION AND F
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION CARDIOVERSION AND F
Objectives
To investigate the relationship between atrial fibrillation cardioversion and f wave in electrocardiogram, providing an ordinary and noninvasive method...
Adiponectin and Lone atrial fibrillation
Adiponectin and Lone atrial fibrillation
Objective: Lone atrial fibrillation is an idiopathic arrhythmia seen in younger individuals without any secondary disease. Adiponectin is an endogenous adipocytokine that increases...
Left atrial appendage anatomy and function: short term response to sustained atrial fibrillation
Left atrial appendage anatomy and function: short term response to sustained atrial fibrillation
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether there is significant atrial or atrial appendage enlargement or functional remodelling as a result of one to two months of sustained...
Beyond Coronary Risk: Clinical Scores as Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Coronary Syndrome
Beyond Coronary Risk: Clinical Scores as Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Coronary Syndrome
Atrial fibrillation frequently coexists with chronic coronary syndrome, sharing common cardiovascular risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms. Identifying patients with chro...

