Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Vliv případu Kardassopoulos proti Gruzii a případů investorů ropné společnosti Yukos proti Ruské federaci na prozatímní provádění Smlouvy o energetické chartě a na prozatímní provádění smluv z pohledu mezinárodního práva veřejného

View through CrossRef
The Energy Charter Treaty is a multilateral international treaty that contains regulations that, among other things, provide investors of other contracting parties with protection for their investments in the energy sector. Some States, including the Russian Federation, have provisionally applied the Energy Charter Treaty for several years in the wording of Article 45 of the Energy Charter Treaty. This provisional application under Article 45 of the Energy Charter Treaty raised issues that were considered in arbitrational and court proceedings. In this article, the author analyses several Awards on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of Tribunal, namely the Decision on Jurisdiction of Tribunal in the matter of Kardassopoulos v. Georgia and Interim Awards on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of Tribunal in the matter of investors of the former Russian Oil Company Yukos v. Russian Federation. The proceedings for annulment of Awards of the Tribunal in the matter of investors of former Russian Oil Company Yukos v. Russian Federation were brought before courts in the Netherlands, with the proceedings reaching the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, which decided the case on 5 November 2021. On the basis of the aforementioned decisions in the Kardassopoulos v. Georgia and Yukos oil company investors v. the Russian Federation cases, the author of the article focuses on the assessment of the effects of the provisional application of the Energy Charter Treaty, the interpretation of Article 45 of the Energy Charter Treaty, analysing the question of how the provisional application of the Energy Charter Treaty may be limited by the national law of the state that provisionally applies the Energy Charter Treaty.
Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press
Title: Vliv případu Kardassopoulos proti Gruzii a případů investorů ropné společnosti Yukos proti Ruské federaci na prozatímní provádění Smlouvy o energetické chartě a na prozatímní provádění smluv z pohledu mezinárodního práva veřejného
Description:
The Energy Charter Treaty is a multilateral international treaty that contains regulations that, among other things, provide investors of other contracting parties with protection for their investments in the energy sector.
Some States, including the Russian Federation, have provisionally applied the Energy Charter Treaty for several years in the wording of Article 45 of the Energy Charter Treaty.
This provisional application under Article 45 of the Energy Charter Treaty raised issues that were considered in arbitrational and court proceedings.
In this article, the author analyses several Awards on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of Tribunal, namely the Decision on Jurisdiction of Tribunal in the matter of Kardassopoulos v.
Georgia and Interim Awards on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of Tribunal in the matter of investors of the former Russian Oil Company Yukos v.
Russian Federation.
The proceedings for annulment of Awards of the Tribunal in the matter of investors of former Russian Oil Company Yukos v.
Russian Federation were brought before courts in the Netherlands, with the proceedings reaching the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, which decided the case on 5 November 2021.
On the basis of the aforementioned decisions in the Kardassopoulos v.
Georgia and Yukos oil company investors v.
the Russian Federation cases, the author of the article focuses on the assessment of the effects of the provisional application of the Energy Charter Treaty, the interpretation of Article 45 of the Energy Charter Treaty, analysing the question of how the provisional application of the Energy Charter Treaty may be limited by the national law of the state that provisionally applies the Energy Charter Treaty.

Related Results

Aplikace cizího veřejného práva v řízeních před správními orgány
Aplikace cizího veřejného práva v řízeních před správními orgány
Zatímco otázky aplikace cizího práva při rozhodování ve věcech civilního práva jsou tradičně předmětem zájmu právní nauky, problematika aplikace cizího veřejného práva správními or...
KOJA LJUDSKA PRAVA POSTOJE?
KOJA LJUDSKA PRAVA POSTOJE?
<p>Ljudska prava pripadaju ljudima jednostavno zato što su ljudska bića. Ona se ne mogu kupiti, zaraditi ili naslijediti - ona su neotuđiva - niko nema...
Vladavina prava i ograničavanje vlasti i moći
Vladavina prava i ograničavanje vlasti i moći
Ovaj tekst posvećujem profesoru Jovici Trkulji, verujući da se na ovoj temi može ilustrovati i njegova sfera interesovanja i njegov intelektualni angažman, kao i tačka presecanja i...
Het stichtingsdossier van de Sint-Adriaansabdij te Geraardsbergen (1081-1096)
Het stichtingsdossier van de Sint-Adriaansabdij te Geraardsbergen (1081-1096)
La fondation de l'abbaye de Saint-Adrien de Grammont (1081-1096). Étude diplomatique. À la fin du XIe siècle, l'abbaye de Saint-Adrien, jusque-là établie à Dikkelvenne, fut t...
Yukos's Principal Shareholders v. Russia
Yukos's Principal Shareholders v. Russia
Yukos conducted its sales through a network of companies registered in a number of low-tax regions in Russia. Following tax investigation, Russian authorities found it had underpai...
MAPPING AND ASSESSMENT OF LAND COVER CHANGE AND ECOLOGICAL STABILITY: A CASE OF THREE TRANSECTS IN SLOVAKIA
MAPPING AND ASSESSMENT OF LAND COVER CHANGE AND ECOLOGICAL STABILITY: A CASE OF THREE TRANSECTS IN SLOVAKIA
Aim of the study: The aim of this paper is to analyze and assess the land cover change in three transects in Slovakia by applying the coefficient of ecological stability and the co...
Efektivní porušení práva
Efektivní porušení práva
Řada subjektů vědomě poruší smlouvu s cílem získat pro sebe výhodu na úkor jiných či v neprospěch veřejného zájmu. Sankce se přitom pokládá za přijatelnou „cenu“ takového porušení....

Back to Top