Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

MARCUS LICINIUS CRASSUS AND THE FIRST TRIUMVIRATE

View through CrossRef
Summary. The article deals with the activities of Marcus Licinius Crassus as a triumvir and the consequences of his participation in the triumvirate. The methodology of the study is based on the principles of historicism and scientific objectivity, general scientific and special historical methods: analysis, synthesis, problem-chronological and the method of historical reconstruction. The scientific novelty is that for the first time in the Ukrainian historiography the article considers the activity of Marcus Licinius Crassus as a triumvir and his achievements of his participation in the triumvirate. With Caesar and Pompey’s support Crassus reached the consulate for the second time taking control of the province of Syria, which was the culmination of his political and military career. The conclusions are as follows. Crassus’ political position was strengthened with the foundation of the triumvirate, but his political dividends were initially the most modest compared to those received by Caesar and Pompey. This exacerbated the contradictions between him and the other members of the triumvirate. The triumvirs managed to settle disputes and restore unity at a conference at Lucca in 56 BC, after which the alliance of Caesar, Pompey and Crassus became obvious to all. Crassus received assurances of support for the fulfillment of all his desires and was able to implement everything planned, as well as the other members of the triumvirate. It was Crassus’ participation in an alliance with Caesar and Pompey and their support that allowed Crassus to achieve a second consulate, to gain control of the province of Syria and organize a military campaign against the Parthian kingdom.
Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University
Title: MARCUS LICINIUS CRASSUS AND THE FIRST TRIUMVIRATE
Description:
Summary.
The article deals with the activities of Marcus Licinius Crassus as a triumvir and the consequences of his participation in the triumvirate.
The methodology of the study is based on the principles of historicism and scientific objectivity, general scientific and special historical methods: analysis, synthesis, problem-chronological and the method of historical reconstruction.
The scientific novelty is that for the first time in the Ukrainian historiography the article considers the activity of Marcus Licinius Crassus as a triumvir and his achievements of his participation in the triumvirate.
With Caesar and Pompey’s support Crassus reached the consulate for the second time taking control of the province of Syria, which was the culmination of his political and military career.
The conclusions are as follows.
Crassus’ political position was strengthened with the foundation of the triumvirate, but his political dividends were initially the most modest compared to those received by Caesar and Pompey.
This exacerbated the contradictions between him and the other members of the triumvirate.
The triumvirs managed to settle disputes and restore unity at a conference at Lucca in 56 BC, after which the alliance of Caesar, Pompey and Crassus became obvious to all.
Crassus received assurances of support for the fulfillment of all his desires and was able to implement everything planned, as well as the other members of the triumvirate.
It was Crassus’ participation in an alliance with Caesar and Pompey and their support that allowed Crassus to achieve a second consulate, to gain control of the province of Syria and organize a military campaign against the Parthian kingdom.

Related Results

Erratum to: Crassus’ Command in the War against Spartacus (73–71 BCE): His Official Position, Forces and Political Spoils
Erratum to: Crassus’ Command in the War against Spartacus (73–71 BCE): His Official Position, Forces and Political Spoils
SummaryLate in 72 BCE, Spartacus’ stunning series of victories over the consuls L. Gellius Publicola and Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Clodianus and then the proconsul C. Cassius Longinus...
Crassus’ Command in the War against Spartacus (73–71 BCE): His Official Position, Forces and Political Spoils
Crassus’ Command in the War against Spartacus (73–71 BCE): His Official Position, Forces and Political Spoils
Summary Late in 72 BCE, Spartacus’ stunning series of victories over the consuls L. Gellius Publicola and Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Clodianus and then the proconsul C. ...
Prominentny przodek pogromcy Spartakusa – Publius Licinius Crassus Dives, konsul w 205 r. przed Chr.
Prominentny przodek pogromcy Spartakusa – Publius Licinius Crassus Dives, konsul w 205 r. przed Chr.
The author attempts to answer to question, to what extent eulogy written down by Livy and concerning title figure of Publius Licinius Crassus (consul in 205 B.C.), corresponded wit...
A Year of One's Own: Dating the Praetorship of Marcus Crassus
A Year of One's Own: Dating the Praetorship of Marcus Crassus
AbstractIt is curious that, although a wholeLifeof Plutarch is devoted to Marcus Crassus, so little is known as to the facts and dates of hiscursus honorum.His praetorship is a fac...
Promotion civique et droit à la parole : L. Licinius Crassus, les accusateurs et les rhéteurs latins
Promotion civique et droit à la parole : L. Licinius Crassus, les accusateurs et les rhéteurs latins
Jean-Michel David, Promotion civique et droit la parole : L. Licinius Crassus, les accusa teurs et les rhéteurs latins, p. 135-181. Après une phase préparatoire au cours...
Débuts oratoires et causa popularis à Rome au IIe s. avant J.-C. : l’exemple de L. Licinius Crassus
Débuts oratoires et causa popularis à Rome au IIe s. avant J.-C. : l’exemple de L. Licinius Crassus
Encore adulescens, L. Licinius Crassus traîna devant les tribunaux C. Papirius Carbo, et joua également un rôle, non négligeable, dans la fondation de la colonie de Narbonne. Cette...
M. Licinius Crassus’ Parthian War: Campaign 53 BC
M. Licinius Crassus’ Parthian War: Campaign 53 BC
The article discusses a number of issues related to the Parthian campaign of M. Licinius Crassus. An attempt was made to show that Crassus, on the whole, was quite competent in dir...

Back to Top