Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Optical density analysis of standard phantom for mammography quality control

View through CrossRef
Background/Objectives: The objective of this study was to analyze optic density of dummy lesions in breast phantom by mammography and understand whether the objectivity of visual inspections on dummy lesions upon appropriate and inappropriate decisions was correct quantitatively. Methods/Statistical analysis: Study subjects were 165 phantom images in 74 hospitals nationwide that passed the test of special medical equipment by Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image from May 2016 to April 2017. Min (A), Max (B), Mean (C), and StdDev (D) were measured using color level information. Fibers, specks, and masses divided dummy lesions determined as appropriate or inappropriate in 165 images. For each divided dummy lesion, Min, Max, Mean concentration, and concentration difference summarized it. Findings: There was a significant difference in Max concentration (B) between dummy lesions of 9 (specks 3) and 10 (specks 4). In dummy lesion 12 (mass 1), there was no significant difference by each step, although the deviation between black and white was high since the scope of lesion was big. Upon analysis of optic density divided by appropriate and inappropriate decisions, there were significant differences in concentration difference (D) for fibers, Min (A) and Max (B) concentrations as well as concentration difference (D) for specks, and Max (B) and Mean (C) concentrations with concentration difference (D) for masses. Improvements/Applications: Visual inspections appeared to have difficulty in analyzing lesions due to the ambiguity of quantitative differences. Further developments of quantitative programs are needed to replace visual inspection for breast phantom lesions in mammography.
Title: Optical density analysis of standard phantom for mammography quality control
Description:
Background/Objectives: The objective of this study was to analyze optic density of dummy lesions in breast phantom by mammography and understand whether the objectivity of visual inspections on dummy lesions upon appropriate and inappropriate decisions was correct quantitatively.
Methods/Statistical analysis: Study subjects were 165 phantom images in 74 hospitals nationwide that passed the test of special medical equipment by Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image from May 2016 to April 2017.
Min (A), Max (B), Mean (C), and StdDev (D) were measured using color level information.
Fibers, specks, and masses divided dummy lesions determined as appropriate or inappropriate in 165 images.
For each divided dummy lesion, Min, Max, Mean concentration, and concentration difference summarized it.
Findings: There was a significant difference in Max concentration (B) between dummy lesions of 9 (specks 3) and 10 (specks 4).
In dummy lesion 12 (mass 1), there was no significant difference by each step, although the deviation between black and white was high since the scope of lesion was big.
Upon analysis of optic density divided by appropriate and inappropriate decisions, there were significant differences in concentration difference (D) for fibers, Min (A) and Max (B) concentrations as well as concentration difference (D) for specks, and Max (B) and Mean (C) concentrations with concentration difference (D) for masses.
Improvements/Applications: Visual inspections appeared to have difficulty in analyzing lesions due to the ambiguity of quantitative differences.
Further developments of quantitative programs are needed to replace visual inspection for breast phantom lesions in mammography.

Related Results

Body image and perception among adults with and without phantom limb pain
Body image and perception among adults with and without phantom limb pain
AbstractBackgroundFollowing lower‐limb amputation, phantom limb pain (i.e., pain perceived as coming from the amputated portion of the limb) is common. Phantom limb pain may be ass...
Abstract IA15: Neighborhood factors and changes in mammography screening rates in response to promotora intervention in Latinas
Abstract IA15: Neighborhood factors and changes in mammography screening rates in response to promotora intervention in Latinas
Abstract Latinas have relatively low rates of mammography screening participation, which may contribute to later stage of breast cancer at diagnosis for Latinas, and...
Cost–benefit analysis of mammography screening: the perspective of Nigerian healthcare providers
Cost–benefit analysis of mammography screening: the perspective of Nigerian healthcare providers
Introduction There is no national breast cancer screening implemented in Nigeria. The National Cancer Control Plan (NCCP) has a goal of making screening services ...
Contrast‐detail phantom scoring methodology
Contrast‐detail phantom scoring methodology
Published results of medical imaging studies which make use of contrast detail mammography (CDMAM) phantom images for analysis are difficult to compare since data are often not ana...
Abstract P5-01-02: Glandular dose in contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography
Abstract P5-01-02: Glandular dose in contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography
Abstract INTRODUCTION Estimation of the Average Glandular Dose (AGD) absorbed by the breast during x-ray based examination is an established part of q...
Evaluation of Douyin Short Videos on Mammography in China: Quality and Reliability Analysis
Evaluation of Douyin Short Videos on Mammography in China: Quality and Reliability Analysis
Abstract Background Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor and the fifth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, imposing a significan...
Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic
Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic
Background: Most late-stage breast cancer occurs in those who have never been screened. Uninsured women have lower screening rates than insured women. Student-run free clinics (SRF...

Back to Top