Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cost–benefit analysis of mammography screening: the perspective of Nigerian healthcare providers
View through CrossRef
Introduction
There is no national breast cancer screening implemented in Nigeria. The National Cancer Control Plan (NCCP) has a goal of making screening services and early detection of cancer available for all Nigerians. Health financing is predominantly through out-of-pocket (OOP) spending. As it could take a while for the NCCP to figure out a financing mechanism to make screening widely available, it is necessary to assess if mammography screening could be potentially funded by OOP by ascertaining the value that eligible women place on it. This study assessed the cost–benefit of mammography screening from the healthcare provider’s perspective.
Methods
This hospital-based cross-sectional study assessed the potential benefit of mammography using participants’ willingness to pay (WTP) for the service. Average WTP was determined using contingent valuation. Binary logistic regression was used to assess predictors of WTP acceptance while multiple linear regression was used to model the relationship between the independent variables and WTP amount. The cost of mammography was estimated from the healthcare provider’s perspective. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to account for parameter uncertainty. The benefit–cost ratio (BCR) was calculated.
Results
767 respondents participated in the study. The stated average WTP amount (minimum-maximum) was US$10.26 (US$0.0–US$46.20). Participants who had never noticed a breast change were 2.5 times more likely to be willing to pay for mammography screening. A unit increase in income level led to a US$9.185 increase in WTP amount for mammography screening. Also, a unit increase in breast self-examination led to a US$2.797 increase in WTP amount for mammography screening. The average cost (minimum-maximum) of mammography was US$23.02 (US$13.20–US$33.00). The BCR of mammography screening was 0.45 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.46).
Conclusions
Mammography screening is not cost–beneficial to the healthcare provider when clients are asked to pay OOP. This highlights the need to explore sustainable health financing mechanisms to support mammography screening in Nigeria.
Title: Cost–benefit analysis of mammography screening: the perspective of Nigerian healthcare providers
Description:
Introduction
There is no national breast cancer screening implemented in Nigeria.
The National Cancer Control Plan (NCCP) has a goal of making screening services and early detection of cancer available for all Nigerians.
Health financing is predominantly through out-of-pocket (OOP) spending.
As it could take a while for the NCCP to figure out a financing mechanism to make screening widely available, it is necessary to assess if mammography screening could be potentially funded by OOP by ascertaining the value that eligible women place on it.
This study assessed the cost–benefit of mammography screening from the healthcare provider’s perspective.
Methods
This hospital-based cross-sectional study assessed the potential benefit of mammography using participants’ willingness to pay (WTP) for the service.
Average WTP was determined using contingent valuation.
Binary logistic regression was used to assess predictors of WTP acceptance while multiple linear regression was used to model the relationship between the independent variables and WTP amount.
The cost of mammography was estimated from the healthcare provider’s perspective.
Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to account for parameter uncertainty.
The benefit–cost ratio (BCR) was calculated.
Results
767 respondents participated in the study.
The stated average WTP amount (minimum-maximum) was US$10.
26 (US$0.
0–US$46.
20).
Participants who had never noticed a breast change were 2.
5 times more likely to be willing to pay for mammography screening.
A unit increase in income level led to a US$9.
185 increase in WTP amount for mammography screening.
Also, a unit increase in breast self-examination led to a US$2.
797 increase in WTP amount for mammography screening.
The average cost (minimum-maximum) of mammography was US$23.
02 (US$13.
20–US$33.
00).
The BCR of mammography screening was 0.
45 (95% CI 0.
44 to 0.
46).
Conclusions
Mammography screening is not cost–beneficial to the healthcare provider when clients are asked to pay OOP.
This highlights the need to explore sustainable health financing mechanisms to support mammography screening in Nigeria.
Related Results
Abstract IA15: Neighborhood factors and changes in mammography screening rates in response to promotora intervention in Latinas
Abstract IA15: Neighborhood factors and changes in mammography screening rates in response to promotora intervention in Latinas
Abstract
Latinas have relatively low rates of mammography screening participation, which may contribute to later stage of breast cancer at diagnosis for Latinas, and...
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract
Introduction
Telemedicine is the remote delivery of healthcare services using information and communication technologies and has gained global recognition as a solution to...
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
Abstract
Background
There is growing concern that routine mammography screening is overused among older women. Successful and equitable de-implementation of mammography wi...
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
A Mixed-Methods Study of Multi-Level Factors Influencing Mammography Overuse: Implications for De-implementation.
Abstract
Background
There is growing concern that routine mammography screening is overused among older women. Successful and equitable de-implementation of mammography wi...
Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic
Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic
Background: Most late-stage breast cancer occurs in those who have never been screened. Uninsured women have lower screening rates than insured women. Student-run free clinics (SRF...
Health Disparities in Receipt of Screening Mammography in Latinas: A Critical Review of Recent Literature
Health Disparities in Receipt of Screening Mammography in Latinas: A Critical Review of Recent Literature
Background
Increased use of screening mammography is associated with lower death rates from breast cancer in the United States. Despite recommendations that wom...
Psychological predictors of intention and avoidance of attending organized mammography screening in Norway: applying the Extended Parallel Process Model
Psychological predictors of intention and avoidance of attending organized mammography screening in Norway: applying the Extended Parallel Process Model
Abstract
Background
Mammography screening is the main method for early detection of breast cancer in Norway. Few studies have focused on psychologic...
Mammografiprogrammet – tidligere, i dag og i fremtiden
Mammografiprogrammet – tidligere, i dag og i fremtiden
Norsk sammendrag
Mammografiprogrammet (engelsk: BreastScreen Norway) er det offentlige screeningprogrammet for brystkreft i Norge. Det startet som et pilotprosjekt i 1995 og ble gr...

