Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Bioequivalence of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate with a next-generation propellant versus hydrofluoroalkane-134a in healthy adults: phase I, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, partial-replicate, three-way cross-over lung exposure and to

View through CrossRef
Background: Hydrofluoroolefin-1234ze (HFO-1234ze) is a next-generation propellant with 99.9% lower global warming potential (GWP) than hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-134a). Objectives: We report systemic and lung exposure bioequivalence for budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) components with HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a. Design: These phase I, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, 3-way cross-over trials in healthy adults included three phases (screening; three single-dose treatment periods with 3- to 7-day washouts; follow-up). Methods: Participants were randomized to four BGF inhalations (160/9/4.8 µg/actuation) with test (HFO-1234ze) or reference (HFA-134a) treatments in one of three sequences, with HFA-134a administered during two of the three treatment periods. For lung exposure, oral activated charcoal was administered before and after treatment. Bioequivalence was considered established if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) was within 80%–125% (or expanded limits, if appropriate) for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration–curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUCinf; US approach only). Results: Bioequivalence criteria were met across BGF components. The 90% CI for the GMR was within 80%–125% (or expanded limits) for HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a, for systemic (GMR: Cmax, 85.41–99.29; AUClast, 95.74–102.48; AUCinf, 90.72–102.58) and lung (GMR: Cmax, 93.39–104.24, AUClast, 97.02–107.76; AUCinf, 101.45–112.22) exposure. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Total systemic and lung exposure to all BGF components met bioequivalence criteria for HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a, with no new or unexpected safety findings. The near-zero GWP HFO-1234ze propellant is a viable replacement for HFA-134a. Trial registration: NCT05569421 (clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05569421) and NCT05477108 (clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05477108).
Title: Bioequivalence of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate with a next-generation propellant versus hydrofluoroalkane-134a in healthy adults: phase I, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, partial-replicate, three-way cross-over lung exposure and to
Description:
Background: Hydrofluoroolefin-1234ze (HFO-1234ze) is a next-generation propellant with 99.
9% lower global warming potential (GWP) than hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-134a).
Objectives: We report systemic and lung exposure bioequivalence for budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) components with HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a.
Design: These phase I, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, 3-way cross-over trials in healthy adults included three phases (screening; three single-dose treatment periods with 3- to 7-day washouts; follow-up).
Methods: Participants were randomized to four BGF inhalations (160/9/4.
8 µg/actuation) with test (HFO-1234ze) or reference (HFA-134a) treatments in one of three sequences, with HFA-134a administered during two of the three treatment periods.
For lung exposure, oral activated charcoal was administered before and after treatment.
Bioequivalence was considered established if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) was within 80%–125% (or expanded limits, if appropriate) for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration–curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUCinf; US approach only).
Results: Bioequivalence criteria were met across BGF components.
The 90% CI for the GMR was within 80%–125% (or expanded limits) for HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a, for systemic (GMR: Cmax, 85.
41–99.
29; AUClast, 95.
74–102.
48; AUCinf, 90.
72–102.
58) and lung (GMR: Cmax, 93.
39–104.
24, AUClast, 97.
02–107.
76; AUCinf, 101.
45–112.
22) exposure.
No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: Total systemic and lung exposure to all BGF components met bioequivalence criteria for HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a, with no new or unexpected safety findings.
The near-zero GWP HFO-1234ze propellant is a viable replacement for HFA-134a.
Trial registration: NCT05569421 (clinicaltrials.
gov/study/NCT05569421) and NCT05477108 (clinicaltrials.
gov/study/NCT05477108).

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Enantioselective Chromatographic Analysis of Formoterol Fumarate using Chiral Mobile Phase Additives and Achiral Core-Shell Column
Enantioselective Chromatographic Analysis of Formoterol Fumarate using Chiral Mobile Phase Additives and Achiral Core-Shell Column
A simple, robust, cost-effective, and rapid RP-HPLC method was developed for the separation of enantiomers of formoterol. The separation was achieved by the chiral mobile phase ...
Co-inhalation of roflumilast, rather than formoterol, with fluticasone more effectively improves asthma in asthmatic mice
Co-inhalation of roflumilast, rather than formoterol, with fluticasone more effectively improves asthma in asthmatic mice
Roflumilast is approved as an add-on therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is mainly neutrophilic, while in a...
An Assessment of the Application of Propellant Enhancement to Conventional Wells
An Assessment of the Application of Propellant Enhancement to Conventional Wells
Abstract Propellant enhancement is a method of increasing permeability through the application of a transient high pressure event to the target formation. As distinc...
MO154: Enteric Budesonide in IGAN Nephropathy: A Real World Clinical Practice
MO154: Enteric Budesonide in IGAN Nephropathy: A Real World Clinical Practice
Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS The gut–kidney axis seems to have a principal role in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) developme...
Effects of Budesonide Plus Vitamin AD on Children with Bronchial Asthma and the Effect on Serum IgE and C-reactive Protein
Effects of Budesonide Plus Vitamin AD on Children with Bronchial Asthma and the Effect on Serum IgE and C-reactive Protein
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of budesonide plus vitamin AD in children with bronchial asthma and the efect on serum IgE and C-reactive protein (CRP). Methods: In this ret...

Back to Top