Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An Assessment of the Application of Propellant Enhancement to Conventional Wells

View through CrossRef
Abstract Propellant enhancement is a method of increasing permeability through the application of a transient high pressure event to the target formation. As distinct from hydraulic fracturing, propellant enhancement does not involve the application of chemicals or water and consequently does not present the potential for legacy environmental issues. This paper compares the regulatory aspects of propellant enhancement within the states of Australia and also the differences between environmental impacts. A series of propellant enhancements were undertaken for a suite of gas wells in the Surat Basin, Queensland. Propellant charges in the range 18-30 kg were initiated, with deflagration times in the range 500-1,000 milliseconds. The compliance regime for the transport, storage and use of propellant is established under the state’s Explosives Act 1999 as well as the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 and the Environmental Protection Act 1994. There are three categories of fracturing used to increase permeability: explosive fracturing; hydraulic fracturing; and propellant enhancement. Explosive fracturing applies a very high pressure transient over a period of a few microseconds and can cause local, radial fracturing but with less desired compaction; hydraulic fracturing applies a lower pressure but over a longer period and with greater surface power, resulting in fractures that can extend 200-300 m, largely in the vertical plane; and propellant enhancement, which applies a mid-range pressure over a period of 10-1,000 milliseconds, resulting in fractures extending tens of metres but with random distribution. Residuals from the deflagration process are nitrogen, hydrogen chloride, water and carbon dioxide. There are no precursors for the BTEX suite and no conditions arising that could produce BTEX. A prime question was to determine whether propellant enhancement is captured under the term ‘hydraulic fracturing’ in states’ regulations across Australia. Propellant enhancement is a technology with very few environmental impacts. Vehicular movements to support propellant enhancement are less than five percent of those to undertake hydraulic fracturing on the same formation. There is no requirement for waste water treatment.
Title: An Assessment of the Application of Propellant Enhancement to Conventional Wells
Description:
Abstract Propellant enhancement is a method of increasing permeability through the application of a transient high pressure event to the target formation.
As distinct from hydraulic fracturing, propellant enhancement does not involve the application of chemicals or water and consequently does not present the potential for legacy environmental issues.
This paper compares the regulatory aspects of propellant enhancement within the states of Australia and also the differences between environmental impacts.
A series of propellant enhancements were undertaken for a suite of gas wells in the Surat Basin, Queensland.
Propellant charges in the range 18-30 kg were initiated, with deflagration times in the range 500-1,000 milliseconds.
The compliance regime for the transport, storage and use of propellant is established under the state’s Explosives Act 1999 as well as the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 and the Environmental Protection Act 1994.
There are three categories of fracturing used to increase permeability: explosive fracturing; hydraulic fracturing; and propellant enhancement.
Explosive fracturing applies a very high pressure transient over a period of a few microseconds and can cause local, radial fracturing but with less desired compaction; hydraulic fracturing applies a lower pressure but over a longer period and with greater surface power, resulting in fractures that can extend 200-300 m, largely in the vertical plane; and propellant enhancement, which applies a mid-range pressure over a period of 10-1,000 milliseconds, resulting in fractures extending tens of metres but with random distribution.
Residuals from the deflagration process are nitrogen, hydrogen chloride, water and carbon dioxide.
There are no precursors for the BTEX suite and no conditions arising that could produce BTEX.
A prime question was to determine whether propellant enhancement is captured under the term ‘hydraulic fracturing’ in states’ regulations across Australia.
Propellant enhancement is a technology with very few environmental impacts.
Vehicular movements to support propellant enhancement are less than five percent of those to undertake hydraulic fracturing on the same formation.
There is no requirement for waste water treatment.

Related Results

[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED]Rhino XL Reviews, NY USA: Studies show that testosterone levels in males decrease constantly with growing age. There are also many other problems that males face due ...
Survey Of Horizontal Gas Well Activity
Survey Of Horizontal Gas Well Activity
Abstract This paper presents the results of a survey on horizontal gas well activity throughout the world. The survey was conducted for the Gas Research Institute...
Experimental Evaluation of Fracture Models Parameters and its Validation for Naturally Aged Composite Solid Propellant
Experimental Evaluation of Fracture Models Parameters and its Validation for Naturally Aged Composite Solid Propellant
Parameters for the Fracture models namely the Inherent Flaw Model (IFM), Point Stress Criterion (PSC) and Average Stress Criterion (ASC) were experimentally determined for HTPB-Al-...
Research on NEPE Propellant at High Strain Rates
Research on NEPE Propellant at High Strain Rates
Abstract In order to study the mechanical properties of Nitrate Ester Plasticized Polyether (NEPE) propellant at high strain rates, the impact tests of NEPE propella...
Comparative Analysis of Potassium Nitrate-Based Solid Propellant Rockets: Sucrose vs. Sorbitol
Comparative Analysis of Potassium Nitrate-Based Solid Propellant Rockets: Sucrose vs. Sorbitol
This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of two strong propellant rocket fuels: potassium nitrate blended with sucrose (sugar) and potassium nitrate mixed with sorb...
Effect of Antioxidant on Storage Performance and Life Prediction of HTPB Propellant
Effect of Antioxidant on Storage Performance and Life Prediction of HTPB Propellant
Abstract In order to study the aging property of HTPB propellant in storage and the effect of antioxidant on the storage life of propellant, accelerated aging tests ...
Optimizing Spacecraft Lifespan: Balancing Mass and Propellant Fraction
Optimizing Spacecraft Lifespan: Balancing Mass and Propellant Fraction
Over the decades, scholars and data scientists have extensively explored the correlation between satellite mass and its impact on satellite reliability—an essential consideration f...
The interior ballistic performance of propellant charge with ultra-large length-to-diameter
The interior ballistic performance of propellant charge with ultra-large length-to-diameter
In order to thoroughly verify the stability of interior ballistic of propellant charge with ultra-large length-to-diameter that used in a ship-borne large-caliber weapon, the inter...

Back to Top