Javascript must be enabled to continue!
W. V. Quine and David Lewis: Structural (Epistemological) Humility
View through CrossRef
This chapter argues that W. V. Quine and D. K. Lewis, despite their differences and their different receptions, came to a common intellectual destination: epistemological structuralism. The chapter begins by providing an account of Quine’s epistemological structuralism as it came to its mature development in his final works, Pursuit of Truth (1990) and From Stimulus to Science (1995), and the chapter shows how this doctrine developed out of his earlier views on explication and the inscrutability of reference. It then turns to the correspondence between Quine and Lewis which sets the scene for Lewis’s adoption of structuralism vis-à-vis set theory in the Appendix to his Parts of Classes (1990). The chapter concludes, drawing further from Lewis’s correspondence, by arguing that Lewis proceeded from there to embrace in one of his own final papers, ‘Ramseyan Humility’ (2001), an encompassing form of epistemological structuralism, whilst discharging the doctrine of reference magnetism that had hitherto set Lewis apart from Quine.
Oxford University Press
Title: W. V. Quine and David Lewis: Structural (Epistemological) Humility
Description:
This chapter argues that W.
V.
Quine and D.
K.
Lewis, despite their differences and their different receptions, came to a common intellectual destination: epistemological structuralism.
The chapter begins by providing an account of Quine’s epistemological structuralism as it came to its mature development in his final works, Pursuit of Truth (1990) and From Stimulus to Science (1995), and the chapter shows how this doctrine developed out of his earlier views on explication and the inscrutability of reference.
It then turns to the correspondence between Quine and Lewis which sets the scene for Lewis’s adoption of structuralism vis-à-vis set theory in the Appendix to his Parts of Classes (1990).
The chapter concludes, drawing further from Lewis’s correspondence, by arguing that Lewis proceeded from there to embrace in one of his own final papers, ‘Ramseyan Humility’ (2001), an encompassing form of epistemological structuralism, whilst discharging the doctrine of reference magnetism that had hitherto set Lewis apart from Quine.
Related Results
Humility, Pride, and Christian Virtue Theory
Humility, Pride, and Christian Virtue Theory
Abstract
This book proposes an account of humility that relies on the most radical Christian sayings about humility, especially those found in Augustine and the earl...
Quine y la ontología
Quine y la ontología
Resumen
La ontología jugó un rol muy amplio en la filosofía de Quine y fue una de sus mayores preocupaciones desde el inicio de los años 30 hasta el final de su vida. Su trabajo s...
Quine, Willard Van Orman (1908–2000)
Quine, Willard Van Orman (1908–2000)
Quine is the foremost representative of naturalism in the second half of the twentieth century. His naturalism consists of an insistence upon a close connection or alliance between...
Mundane Humility
Mundane Humility
Abstract
Christian humility was repurposed in the early modern period to suit the goals of the emerging liberal state. After sketching how Thomas Hobbes achieved thi...
Quine's Scientific Realism Revisited
Quine's Scientific Realism Revisited
AbstractIn order to reconnect Quine's views to the current debate on scientific realism, I reframe Quine's scientific realism into a semantic, a metaphysical, and an epistemologica...
Plasma AR Alterations and Timing of Intensified Hormone Treatment for Prostate Cancer
Plasma AR Alterations and Timing of Intensified Hormone Treatment for Prostate Cancer
This randomized clinical trial explores whether hormone intensification at start of androgen deprivation therapy alters selection of androgen receptor (AR) gene alterations within ...
Remembering Christian Humility
Remembering Christian Humility
Abstract
Augustine’s Confessions is a locus classicus for early Christian privileging of the virtue of humility. This chapter shows that the contemporary “memory” of...
Form Follows Force: A theoretical framework for Structural Morphology, and Form-Finding research on shell structures
Form Follows Force: A theoretical framework for Structural Morphology, and Form-Finding research on shell structures
The springing up of freeform architecture and structures introduces many challenges to structural engineers. The main challenge is to generate structural forms with high structural...

