Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Simplified (Screening) Approach to Check the Calibration Status of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer

View through CrossRef
Background: To investigate whether a lower-end calibration error check alone can identify a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) with acceptable calibration error as per Asia-Pacific Glaucoma Society (APGS) and World Glaucoma Association (WGA) guidelines. Methods: This was a multicentric prospective study in a tertiary eye-care institutional setting. Seventy-six slit-lamp–mounted Haag-Streit GATs (Model AT 900 C/M) were included in the study. All GATs were checked for calibration error at 0, 20, and 60 mm Hg testing levels as recommended by the manufacturer. The ability of 2 screening criteria (calibration error within ±1 or ±2 mm Hg, respectively, at the 0 mm Hg testing level without using the calibration error check weight bar) to identify a tonometer within acceptable calibration limits defined by APGS (calibration error within ±2, ±3, and ±4 mm Hg at 0, 20, and 60 mm Hg testing levels, respectively) and WGA (calibration error within ±1 mm Hg at all testing levels) was determined. Main Outcome Measure: The negative likelihood ratio of the screening criteria Results: Five (6.6%) and 42 (55%) GATs were outside of the APGS and the WGA calibration limits, respectively. Negative likelihood ratios of the first and the second screening criteria at the APGS definition of calibration error tolerance were 0.11 and 0.25, respectively, and at that of the WGA definition of calibration error tolerance were 0.38 and 0.90, respectively. Conclusions: The screening criteria of calibration error within ±1 mm Hg at the 0 mm Hg testing level seem to be clinically useful to detect GAT with an acceptable calibration error as per the APGS guideline.
Title: A Simplified (Screening) Approach to Check the Calibration Status of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
Description:
Background: To investigate whether a lower-end calibration error check alone can identify a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) with acceptable calibration error as per Asia-Pacific Glaucoma Society (APGS) and World Glaucoma Association (WGA) guidelines.
Methods: This was a multicentric prospective study in a tertiary eye-care institutional setting.
Seventy-six slit-lamp–mounted Haag-Streit GATs (Model AT 900 C/M) were included in the study.
All GATs were checked for calibration error at 0, 20, and 60 mm Hg testing levels as recommended by the manufacturer.
The ability of 2 screening criteria (calibration error within ±1 or ±2 mm Hg, respectively, at the 0 mm Hg testing level without using the calibration error check weight bar) to identify a tonometer within acceptable calibration limits defined by APGS (calibration error within ±2, ±3, and ±4 mm Hg at 0, 20, and 60 mm Hg testing levels, respectively) and WGA (calibration error within ±1 mm Hg at all testing levels) was determined.
Main Outcome Measure: The negative likelihood ratio of the screening criteria Results: Five (6.
6%) and 42 (55%) GATs were outside of the APGS and the WGA calibration limits, respectively.
Negative likelihood ratios of the first and the second screening criteria at the APGS definition of calibration error tolerance were 0.
11 and 0.
25, respectively, and at that of the WGA definition of calibration error tolerance were 0.
38 and 0.
90, respectively.
Conclusions: The screening criteria of calibration error within ±1 mm Hg at the 0 mm Hg testing level seem to be clinically useful to detect GAT with an acceptable calibration error as per the APGS guideline.

Related Results

(Invited) Strategies for Calibration Cost Reduction in Heterogeneous Chemical Sensor Arrays
(Invited) Strategies for Calibration Cost Reduction in Heterogeneous Chemical Sensor Arrays
Introduction Heterogeneous gas sensor arrays coupled with machine learning algorithms have been proposed for a wide range of applications. However, i...
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurement by iCare Tonometer and Goldman Applanation Tonometer
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurement by iCare Tonometer and Goldman Applanation Tonometer
  Objective: To compare the Intraocular Pressure measured by the Goldmann Applanation tonometer with by iCare ic100 tonometer in normal human eye to determine the accuracy and reli...
Implantable arterial blood pressure sensor
Implantable arterial blood pressure sensor
Although blood pressure measurements are well developed, the existing technology in the field of Arterial Blood Pressure (ABP) measurements is not sufficient in terms of long-term ...
Effect of Corneal Hydration on Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Corneal Topography
Effect of Corneal Hydration on Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Corneal Topography
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Measured ocular tension is reported to be positively related to corneal thickness. It has been speculated that an edematous cornea will cause low mea...
How Often the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer Should be Checked for Calibration Error?
How Often the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer Should be Checked for Calibration Error?
Purpose: To evaluate the frequency of Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) calibration error (CE) check. Methods: One obse...
Changes in Intraocular Pressure After Laser in situ Keratomileusis
Changes in Intraocular Pressure After Laser in situ Keratomileusis
ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia a...

Back to Top