Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Effectiveness of Longitudinal Rumble Strips on Indiana Roads

View through CrossRef
Rumble strips are designed and deployed to reduce run-off-road and head-on crashes by alerting drivers about near-lane departures. Although they have been widely used, their operational safety effectiveness still needs to be investigated under various operational conditions. Rumble strips may have different widths and be installed on edge, shoulder, center, or in any combination of these locations. To perform a comprehensive analysis of rumble strips’ safety effectiveness on rural two-lanes roads across Indiana, both statistical analysis and field test were performed. To statistically analyze this problem, a dataset for road segments with installed rumble strips including crash data, strips’ locations, types, dimensions, and road geometry were extracted. The 2015–2022 crash data was assigned to over 5,600 road segments with homogeneous rumble strip arrangement (including no strips), traffic, and cross-section, yielding more than 20,000 miles-years of observations. To account for the potential overdispersion of crash counts and heterogeneity among segments from the same road, the random effect negative binomial model and random effect ordered logit model were estimated. The estimation results indicated that rumble strips significantly reduced the crash rates for run-off-road and head-on crashes. For roadside-only and center-only designs, the Crash Modification Factor (CMF) for target crashes at all severity levels was 0.87; the CMF (KABC) for target crashes was 0.75, and the CMF (PDO) for target crashes was 0.92. When both roadside and centerline rumble strips are present, the all-severity CMF for target crashes was 0.79; the CMF (KABC) for target crashes was 0.68, and the CMF (PDO) for target crashes was 0.84. To test the produced noise and vibration from conventional and sinusoidal rumble strips, field tests were carried out with instrumented vehicles. The observations showed that both conventional and sinusoidal rumble strips meet the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) recommendation of a minimum 3dB increase in sound pressure level. Conventional rumble strips increase sound levels by 4.6–7.5 dB, while sinusoidal rumble strips provide a higher increase of 5.1–11 dB. For both types of rumble strips, the magnitude of vibration also fulfills the requirements for in-cabin vibration. Higher vibration intensities were found for sinusoidal rumble strips compared to conventional ones.
Title: The Effectiveness of Longitudinal Rumble Strips on Indiana Roads
Description:
Rumble strips are designed and deployed to reduce run-off-road and head-on crashes by alerting drivers about near-lane departures.
Although they have been widely used, their operational safety effectiveness still needs to be investigated under various operational conditions.
Rumble strips may have different widths and be installed on edge, shoulder, center, or in any combination of these locations.
To perform a comprehensive analysis of rumble strips’ safety effectiveness on rural two-lanes roads across Indiana, both statistical analysis and field test were performed.
To statistically analyze this problem, a dataset for road segments with installed rumble strips including crash data, strips’ locations, types, dimensions, and road geometry were extracted.
The 2015–2022 crash data was assigned to over 5,600 road segments with homogeneous rumble strip arrangement (including no strips), traffic, and cross-section, yielding more than 20,000 miles-years of observations.
To account for the potential overdispersion of crash counts and heterogeneity among segments from the same road, the random effect negative binomial model and random effect ordered logit model were estimated.
The estimation results indicated that rumble strips significantly reduced the crash rates for run-off-road and head-on crashes.
For roadside-only and center-only designs, the Crash Modification Factor (CMF) for target crashes at all severity levels was 0.
87; the CMF (KABC) for target crashes was 0.
75, and the CMF (PDO) for target crashes was 0.
92.
When both roadside and centerline rumble strips are present, the all-severity CMF for target crashes was 0.
79; the CMF (KABC) for target crashes was 0.
68, and the CMF (PDO) for target crashes was 0.
84.
To test the produced noise and vibration from conventional and sinusoidal rumble strips, field tests were carried out with instrumented vehicles.
The observations showed that both conventional and sinusoidal rumble strips meet the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) recommendation of a minimum 3dB increase in sound pressure level.
Conventional rumble strips increase sound levels by 4.
6–7.
5 dB, while sinusoidal rumble strips provide a higher increase of 5.
1–11 dB.
For both types of rumble strips, the magnitude of vibration also fulfills the requirements for in-cabin vibration.
Higher vibration intensities were found for sinusoidal rumble strips compared to conventional ones.

Related Results

Analisis Pengaruh Rumble Strips dalam Mereduksi Kecepatan Kendaraan
Analisis Pengaruh Rumble Strips dalam Mereduksi Kecepatan Kendaraan
The number of traffic accidents has increased every year, especially in Jambi City. One of the government's efforts to reduce the number of traffic accidents is to make regulations...
Evaluation of Football Shaped Rumble Strips Versus Rectangular Rumble Strips
Evaluation of Football Shaped Rumble Strips Versus Rectangular Rumble Strips
Shoulder and centerline rumble strips have become predominantly used safety measures along American highways in almost all states and in Canadian provinces. Milled shoulder rumble ...
Mitigating Roadside Noise While Maintaining Effectiveness of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips
Mitigating Roadside Noise While Maintaining Effectiveness of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips
<span>T</span><span>his study constructed and field-tested ten shoulder and centerline rumble strip designs to evaluate their performance in reducing roadside noi...
Economic comparison of methods of wound closure: wound closure strips versus sutures and wound adhesives
Economic comparison of methods of wound closure: wound closure strips versus sutures and wound adhesives
Comparaison économique des méthodes de fermeture des plaies: fermetures des plaies par sutures adhésives strips versus sutures et tissus adhésifsNotre objectif était de faire la re...
Effective Shoulder Width on Rural Highway System Related to Roadway Departure Crashes
Effective Shoulder Width on Rural Highway System Related to Roadway Departure Crashes
"Roadway design plays a crucial role in traffic safety, particularly on rural roads. This research investigates the safety effectiveness of shoulder width on Indiana’s rural two-la...
Human Factors Considerations in the Design of Rumble Strips
Human Factors Considerations in the Design of Rumble Strips
<p>Although a number of technical reports have considered different aspects of construction on crash statistics, human factors considerations are less prevalent, and no study...
Smart Roads and Parking
Smart Roads and Parking
The past few years, innovation and technology have reached new heights, much beyond laptops, iPads or smart phones. Innovation and technology is progressing with each passing day. ...
A Review of the Impacts of Roads on Wildlife in Semi-Arid Regions
A Review of the Impacts of Roads on Wildlife in Semi-Arid Regions
Roads now penetrate even the most remote parts of much of the world, but the majority of research on the effects of roads on biota has been in less remote temperate environments. T...

Back to Top