Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Effectiveness of Longitudinal Rumble Strips on Indiana Roads
View through CrossRef
Rumble strips are designed and deployed to reduce run-off-road and head-on crashes by alerting drivers about near-lane departures. Although they have been widely used, their operational safety effectiveness still needs to be investigated under various operational conditions. Rumble strips may have different widths and be installed on edge, shoulder, center, or in any combination of these locations. To perform a comprehensive analysis of rumble strips’ safety effectiveness on rural two-lanes roads across Indiana, both statistical analysis and field test were performed. To statistically analyze this problem, a dataset for road segments with installed rumble strips including crash data, strips’ locations, types, dimensions, and road geometry were extracted. The 2015–2022 crash data was assigned to over 5,600 road segments with homogeneous rumble strip arrangement (including no strips), traffic, and cross-section, yielding more than 20,000 miles-years of observations. To account for the potential overdispersion of crash counts and heterogeneity among segments from the same road, the random effect negative binomial model and random effect ordered logit model were estimated. The estimation results indicated that rumble strips significantly reduced the crash rates for run-off-road and head-on crashes. For roadside-only and center-only designs, the Crash Modification Factor (CMF) for target crashes at all severity levels was 0.87; the CMF (KABC) for target crashes was 0.75, and the CMF (PDO) for target crashes was 0.92. When both roadside and centerline rumble strips are present, the all-severity CMF for target crashes was 0.79; the CMF (KABC) for target crashes was 0.68, and the CMF (PDO) for target crashes was 0.84. To test the produced noise and vibration from conventional and sinusoidal rumble strips, field tests were carried out with instrumented vehicles. The observations showed that both conventional and sinusoidal rumble strips meet the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) recommendation of a minimum 3dB increase in sound pressure level. Conventional rumble strips increase sound levels by 4.6–7.5 dB, while sinusoidal rumble strips provide a higher increase of 5.1–11 dB. For both types of rumble strips, the magnitude of vibration also fulfills the requirements for in-cabin vibration. Higher vibration intensities were found for sinusoidal rumble strips compared to conventional ones.
Title: The Effectiveness of Longitudinal Rumble Strips on Indiana Roads
Description:
Rumble strips are designed and deployed to reduce run-off-road and head-on crashes by alerting drivers about near-lane departures.
Although they have been widely used, their operational safety effectiveness still needs to be investigated under various operational conditions.
Rumble strips may have different widths and be installed on edge, shoulder, center, or in any combination of these locations.
To perform a comprehensive analysis of rumble strips’ safety effectiveness on rural two-lanes roads across Indiana, both statistical analysis and field test were performed.
To statistically analyze this problem, a dataset for road segments with installed rumble strips including crash data, strips’ locations, types, dimensions, and road geometry were extracted.
The 2015–2022 crash data was assigned to over 5,600 road segments with homogeneous rumble strip arrangement (including no strips), traffic, and cross-section, yielding more than 20,000 miles-years of observations.
To account for the potential overdispersion of crash counts and heterogeneity among segments from the same road, the random effect negative binomial model and random effect ordered logit model were estimated.
The estimation results indicated that rumble strips significantly reduced the crash rates for run-off-road and head-on crashes.
For roadside-only and center-only designs, the Crash Modification Factor (CMF) for target crashes at all severity levels was 0.
87; the CMF (KABC) for target crashes was 0.
75, and the CMF (PDO) for target crashes was 0.
92.
When both roadside and centerline rumble strips are present, the all-severity CMF for target crashes was 0.
79; the CMF (KABC) for target crashes was 0.
68, and the CMF (PDO) for target crashes was 0.
84.
To test the produced noise and vibration from conventional and sinusoidal rumble strips, field tests were carried out with instrumented vehicles.
The observations showed that both conventional and sinusoidal rumble strips meet the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) recommendation of a minimum 3dB increase in sound pressure level.
Conventional rumble strips increase sound levels by 4.
6–7.
5 dB, while sinusoidal rumble strips provide a higher increase of 5.
1–11 dB.
For both types of rumble strips, the magnitude of vibration also fulfills the requirements for in-cabin vibration.
Higher vibration intensities were found for sinusoidal rumble strips compared to conventional ones.
Related Results
Impact of Rumble Strips on Longitudinal Joint Pavement Performance
Impact of Rumble Strips on Longitudinal Joint Pavement Performance
Milled centerline rumble strips are commonly used to reduce lane departure crashes. Safety benefits of installing rumble strips are viewed as a higher priority than the potential i...
Analisis Pengaruh Rumble Strips dalam Mereduksi Kecepatan Kendaraan
Analisis Pengaruh Rumble Strips dalam Mereduksi Kecepatan Kendaraan
The number of traffic accidents has increased every year, especially in Jambi City. One of the government's efforts to reduce the number of traffic accidents is to make regulations...
Evaluation of Football Shaped Rumble Strips Versus Rectangular Rumble Strips
Evaluation of Football Shaped Rumble Strips Versus Rectangular Rumble Strips
Shoulder and centerline rumble strips have become predominantly used safety measures along American highways in almost all states and in Canadian provinces. Milled shoulder rumble ...
Rumble Strips: A Human Factors Perspective towards a Sustainable Road System
Rumble Strips: A Human Factors Perspective towards a Sustainable Road System
Prior research substantiates the belief that human factors contribute to up to 90% of all traffic accidents. The failure to consider cognitive ergonomics in road safety initiatives...
Effectiveness and External Noise of Transverse Rumble Strip Designs
Effectiveness and External Noise of Transverse Rumble Strip Designs
The report presents a case study motivated by comments and concerns from residents regarding high levels of noise originating from vehicles passing transverse rumble strips at the ...
Mitigating Roadside Noise While Maintaining Effectiveness of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips
Mitigating Roadside Noise While Maintaining Effectiveness of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips
<span>T</span><span>his study constructed and field-tested ten shoulder and centerline rumble strip designs to evaluate their performance in reducing roadside noi...
Economic comparison of methods of wound closure: wound closure strips versus sutures and wound adhesives
Economic comparison of methods of wound closure: wound closure strips versus sutures and wound adhesives
Comparaison économique des méthodes de fermeture des plaies: fermetures des plaies par sutures adhésives strips versus sutures et tissus adhésifsNotre objectif était de faire la re...
Chiral Sensitivity of Medetomidine Lateral Flow Immunoassay Test Strips
Chiral Sensitivity of Medetomidine Lateral Flow Immunoassay Test Strips
Abstract
Medetomidine has recently emerged in the illicit drug supply in the United States, and lateral flow immunoassay test strips are an inexpensive and easy-to-...

