Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Fredriksvern og verksbyene i Norge
View through CrossRef
Fredriksvern and the company towns in Norway
About 25 company towns, mostly based on mining, can be identified in Norway in the 18th century, if we include very small ones with 200–300 inhabitants. Most people in a company town worked for the company, which also provided services like schools, churches, healthcare and often food supplies. It is obvious that a company town was a monopoly town. But the monopoly could be public or private, and the towns could be governed from within or remotely. Fredriksvern, which is presented in the most detail here, was an unusual company town, as it was connected to a naval shipyard. The shipyard was publicly owned, and the town can thus be classified as a public monopoly town. Who governed the town? Denmark-Norway was a strongly centralized state, and most decisions about Fredriksvern were made by the central administration in Copenhagen. However, the commander who knew the activity best could be influential by sending suggestions to Copenhagen. By far the biggest company town was Kongsberg, with around 8,000 inhabitants in the middle of the century. It was situated near a public silver mine and can also be classified as a public monopoly town, governed much like Fredriksvern. The five Norwegian copperworks situated in central Norway were, however, privately owned, mostly by shareholders living in Trondheim. Company towns like Røros, Kvikne and Løkken were consequently collective, private company towns, and they were governed remotely. Approximately 15 ironworks were situated in eastern and southern Norway. They were usually owned by individuals and could remain in the same families for generations. The small company towns connected to them can be called individual, private monopoly towns. The owners often lived in the town and behaved patriarchally towards their subordinates. To conclude: The company towns were monopoly towns, either public or private, and in the latter case either collective or individual. With the exception of most of the company towns connected to ironworks, they were governed from outside, in contrast to all other Norwegian towns.
Cappelen Damm Akademisk/NOASP
Title: Fredriksvern og verksbyene i Norge
Description:
Fredriksvern and the company towns in Norway
About 25 company towns, mostly based on mining, can be identified in Norway in the 18th century, if we include very small ones with 200–300 inhabitants.
Most people in a company town worked for the company, which also provided services like schools, churches, healthcare and often food supplies.
It is obvious that a company town was a monopoly town.
But the monopoly could be public or private, and the towns could be governed from within or remotely.
Fredriksvern, which is presented in the most detail here, was an unusual company town, as it was connected to a naval shipyard.
The shipyard was publicly owned, and the town can thus be classified as a public monopoly town.
Who governed the town? Denmark-Norway was a strongly centralized state, and most decisions about Fredriksvern were made by the central administration in Copenhagen.
However, the commander who knew the activity best could be influential by sending suggestions to Copenhagen.
By far the biggest company town was Kongsberg, with around 8,000 inhabitants in the middle of the century.
It was situated near a public silver mine and can also be classified as a public monopoly town, governed much like Fredriksvern.
The five Norwegian copperworks situated in central Norway were, however, privately owned, mostly by shareholders living in Trondheim.
Company towns like Røros, Kvikne and Løkken were consequently collective, private company towns, and they were governed remotely.
Approximately 15 ironworks were situated in eastern and southern Norway.
They were usually owned by individuals and could remain in the same families for generations.
The small company towns connected to them can be called individual, private monopoly towns.
The owners often lived in the town and behaved patriarchally towards their subordinates.
To conclude: The company towns were monopoly towns, either public or private, and in the latter case either collective or individual.
With the exception of most of the company towns connected to ironworks, they were governed from outside, in contrast to all other Norwegian towns.
Related Results
Fra Israels til palestinernes beste venn?
Fra Israels til palestinernes beste venn?
Etter 1948 var Norge en av Israels aller beste venner. Palestinernes skjebne vakte ingen interesse. De var glemt. Etter krigen i 1967 forandret disse holdningene seg. Israel var bl...
Forbereder grunnskolelærerutdanningen engelsklærere for undervisning i engelsk som tredjespråk i Norge?
Forbereder grunnskolelærerutdanningen engelsklærere for undervisning i engelsk som tredjespråk i Norge?
Temaet for denne artikkelen er flerspråklighet i skolen, med fokus på engelskundervisning i Norge. Artikkelen undersøker i hvilken grad grunnskolelærerutdanningen forbereder fremti...
EkofisK Oil and Gas Pipeline Construction
EkofisK Oil and Gas Pipeline Construction
American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc.
Abstract
Phillips Petroleum Co. Norway is constructin...
Runde byer i Norge: En kulturhistorisk attraksjon
Runde byer i Norge: En kulturhistorisk attraksjon
Denne boken handler om en type forhistoriske kulturminner som gjerne kalles ’ringformede tunanlegg’, men som her vil omtales som runde byer eller landsbyer. I Norge har et 30-tall ...
Epidemiologi ved systemisk lupus erythematosus (SLE)
Epidemiologi ved systemisk lupus erythematosus (SLE)
Det er utført få epidemiologiske studier av SLE i Norge. De studier som er utført viser liknende hyppighet og forekomst av SLE i Norge som i de øvrige nordiske land og forekomst av...
Ærlig talt? Moralsk motivasjon i Norge og USA
Ærlig talt? Moralsk motivasjon i Norge og USA
Moralsk atferd spiller en avgjørende rolle for økonomiske og sosiale utfall. I denne studien rapporterer vi fra et eksperiment som kartlegger ærlighet i Norge og USA ved hjelp av e...
Asylintervjuet med enslige mindreårige asylsøkere – en utfordrende samtale
Asylintervjuet med enslige mindreårige asylsøkere – en utfordrende samtale
Maria er ei afrikansk jente på 14 som har kommet alene til Norge for å søke asyl. Vi møttes under mitt feltarbeid på et omsorgssenter for enslige mindreårige asylsøkere under 15 år...
Norge Unit Plan Implemented
Norge Unit Plan Implemented
PUBLICATIONS RIGHTS RESERVED PUBLICATIONS RIGHTS RESERVED Permission to include this paper in the Proceedings for the 1977 Permission to include this paper in the Proceedings for t...

