Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative Randomized Study on Outcomes of Hand Suture Technique “Flip-Flap” and Standard Suture Passer Technique in Laparoscopic Surgery
View through CrossRef
Background: Trocar site hernia (TSH) remains a significant postoperative complication of laparoscopic surgery, and optimal port closure technique is debated, especially in resource-limited settings. Comparative evidence regarding the hand suture flip-flap and standard suture passer techniques remains insufficient, particularly in diverse populations with varied risk factors. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the hand suture flip-flap technique versus the standard suture passer technique for port closure in laparoscopic surgery, focusing on the prevention of TSH and mean operative closure time. Methods: In this single-center, randomized controlled trial, 200 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy or appendicectomy were randomized to either the flip-flap group or suture passer group (n = 100 each). Inclusion criteria were age 12–80 years and absence of prior hernia or midline laparotomy. Data collection included demographic characteristics, risk factors, operative details, and postoperative outcomes. The primary outcomes were TSH incidence and mean port closure time, measured at regular follow-ups. Ethical approval was obtained per the Declaration of Helsinki. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v22.0, with chi-square and t-tests for group comparisons. Results: No TSH was observed in either group at three months. Mean port closure time was shorter in the flip-flap group (150.2 ± 30 s) versus the suture passer group (266.3 ± 35 s; p = 0.18). All postoperative complication rates were 0%. Conclusion: Both closure techniques are safe and effective in preventing trocar site hernia, with the flip-flap method offering a clinically meaningful reduction in closure time. These findings support the flexible adoption of either technique based on available resources and surgeon expertise, with broad implications for improving surgical outcomes in minimally invasive procedures.
Title: Comparative Randomized Study on Outcomes of Hand Suture Technique “Flip-Flap” and Standard Suture Passer Technique in Laparoscopic Surgery
Description:
Background: Trocar site hernia (TSH) remains a significant postoperative complication of laparoscopic surgery, and optimal port closure technique is debated, especially in resource-limited settings.
Comparative evidence regarding the hand suture flip-flap and standard suture passer techniques remains insufficient, particularly in diverse populations with varied risk factors.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the hand suture flip-flap technique versus the standard suture passer technique for port closure in laparoscopic surgery, focusing on the prevention of TSH and mean operative closure time.
Methods: In this single-center, randomized controlled trial, 200 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy or appendicectomy were randomized to either the flip-flap group or suture passer group (n = 100 each).
Inclusion criteria were age 12–80 years and absence of prior hernia or midline laparotomy.
Data collection included demographic characteristics, risk factors, operative details, and postoperative outcomes.
The primary outcomes were TSH incidence and mean port closure time, measured at regular follow-ups.
Ethical approval was obtained per the Declaration of Helsinki.
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v22.
0, with chi-square and t-tests for group comparisons.
Results: No TSH was observed in either group at three months.
Mean port closure time was shorter in the flip-flap group (150.
2 ± 30 s) versus the suture passer group (266.
3 ± 35 s; p = 0.
18).
All postoperative complication rates were 0%.
Conclusion: Both closure techniques are safe and effective in preventing trocar site hernia, with the flip-flap method offering a clinically meaningful reduction in closure time.
These findings support the flexible adoption of either technique based on available resources and surgeon expertise, with broad implications for improving surgical outcomes in minimally invasive procedures.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery robot-assisted surgical system has gained significant popularity over open and laparoscopic interventions. However, given its high c...
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Suture is an underreported cause for tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) that can cause significant morbidity. This report describes a case of TOA arising from a silk ...
Outcome of laparoscopy assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy at the department of gastrointestinal surgery, Viet Duc University Hospital
Outcome of laparoscopy assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy at the department of gastrointestinal surgery, Viet Duc University Hospital
Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex surgical procedure associated with a high rate of complications, particularly those arising from...
Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique)
Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique)
Background:
Meniscal extrusion is a phenomenon in which a degenerative posterior horn tear, radial tear, or root tear results in displacement of the body of the meniscu...
A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Background: Although robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has become more in popular, it remains unclear what clinical advantages it offers over conventional laparoscopic surgery. O...
EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS
EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS
Laparoscopic surgery has established itself as a minimally invasive approach that offers several advantages over open surgery, including less post-operative pain, faster recovery a...
Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work
Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has rapidly become established as the popular alternative to open appendectomy, it has a safety profile better than open proc...

