Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Stented and Non-Stented Techniques in Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithoplasty for Upper Ureteral Stones<b></b>
View through CrossRef
Background and Objectives: Extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a non-invasive technique for treating patients with renal calculi. It fragments the stone to smaller size which ease its passage through distal urinary tracts. The purpose of this matched-pair research was to examine patients with ureteric stones to identify the effect of a ureteric stent on the success rate of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). Upper ureteric calculus can be treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; however, complications have been reported. Method: Prospective research was conducted in the Department of Urology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Dhaka. Bangladesh from June 2022 July 2023 with the patients who presented for treatment of upper ureteric calculus. Ethical standards set forth by the committee were adhered to. After being informed of the study's purpose and methods, each participant signed a consent form. Information was entered into a premade proforma. Results: In our study, there were a total of 118 males and 32 females in group A, and 115 males and 35 females in group B. There were 99 patients in the group whose stones were 8–13 mm and 51 patients in the group whose stones were 14–19 mm in size. ESWL success was defined as patients who had undergone three ESWL sessions and were stone-free, while ESWL failure was defined as patients who were not stone-free after three months or who required any extra treatments. Although 13 patients in the stented group did not have stones, 22 had difficulty clearing them with ESWL. Seven patients in the stent-free group had successful ESWL treatment, while eleven others did not. Conclusion: Low morbidity and excellent effectiveness are characteristics of ESWL treatment. Ureteral stenting prior to ESWL offers no advantages over ESWL performed in situ. Patients who receive ureteral stents often experience severe pain and morbidity. The use of ureteral stents to treat upper ureteric calculus led to fewer hospital readmissions than when no stent was used, despite the fact that they are linked to higher irritative symptoms.
Greenfort International Publisher
Title: Stented and Non-Stented Techniques in Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithoplasty for Upper Ureteral Stones<b></b>
Description:
Background and Objectives: Extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a non-invasive technique for treating patients with renal calculi.
It fragments the stone to smaller size which ease its passage through distal urinary tracts.
The purpose of this matched-pair research was to examine patients with ureteric stones to identify the effect of a ureteric stent on the success rate of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL).
Upper ureteric calculus can be treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; however, complications have been reported.
Method: Prospective research was conducted in the Department of Urology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Dhaka.
Bangladesh from June 2022 July 2023 with the patients who presented for treatment of upper ureteric calculus.
Ethical standards set forth by the committee were adhered to.
After being informed of the study's purpose and methods, each participant signed a consent form.
Information was entered into a premade proforma.
Results: In our study, there were a total of 118 males and 32 females in group A, and 115 males and 35 females in group B.
There were 99 patients in the group whose stones were 8–13 mm and 51 patients in the group whose stones were 14–19 mm in size.
ESWL success was defined as patients who had undergone three ESWL sessions and were stone-free, while ESWL failure was defined as patients who were not stone-free after three months or who required any extra treatments.
Although 13 patients in the stented group did not have stones, 22 had difficulty clearing them with ESWL.
Seven patients in the stent-free group had successful ESWL treatment, while eleven others did not.
Conclusion: Low morbidity and excellent effectiveness are characteristics of ESWL treatment.
Ureteral stenting prior to ESWL offers no advantages over ESWL performed in situ.
Patients who receive ureteral stents often experience severe pain and morbidity.
The use of ureteral stents to treat upper ureteric calculus led to fewer hospital readmissions than when no stent was used, despite the fact that they are linked to higher irritative symptoms.
Related Results
Comparison of Hospital Stay in Stented Versus Non-Stented Pyeloplasty in Children with Pelviureteric Junction Obstruction
Comparison of Hospital Stay in Stented Versus Non-Stented Pyeloplasty in Children with Pelviureteric Junction Obstruction
Objective: To compare the average hospital, stay between stented vs non-stented pyeloplasty in children with hydronephrosis due to pelviureteric junction obstruction at our setup. ...
COMPARISON OF STENTED VERSUS NON-STENTED PATIENTS OF URETERIC CALCULI AFTER INTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY
COMPARISON OF STENTED VERSUS NON-STENTED PATIENTS OF URETERIC CALCULI AFTER INTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY
Background: Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological condition resulting from crystalline deposits in the urinary tract, often manifesting as acute flank pain and lower urinary tract...
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Urolithiasis is a prevailing urological condition, with ureteric stones affecting around 22% of cases, mostly causing severe pain and other complications. Surveillance, medical the...
Effect of Preoperative Hydronephrosis on Ureteral Stenosis after Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Propensity Scores Matching Analysis
Effect of Preoperative Hydronephrosis on Ureteral Stenosis after Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Propensity Scores Matching Analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Ureteral stenosis is a serious complication after flexible ureteroscopy. Other studies have confirmed that stone impaction and intraoperative ureteral ...
Rationale for the Use of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Delayed Union of Bone Fractures and Pseudoarthrosis
Rationale for the Use of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Delayed Union of Bone Fractures and Pseudoarthrosis
Relevance. Violation of bone formation processes continues to occupy a relatively high level, reaching 2.7-27.1%, so the search for new methods for their treatment and prevention r...
Prophylactic ureteral stenting in open surgery for deep pelvic malignancies: A simple step to enhance hemostasis
Prophylactic ureteral stenting in open surgery for deep pelvic malignancies: A simple step to enhance hemostasis
Abstract
Background
Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) is a severe complication in surgery for deep pelvic malignancies. The util...
Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5mm
Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5mm
Abstract
The objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE plus scores in detecting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm. This compara...
SILODOSIN FOR PASSIVE URETERAL DILATION PRIOR TO TRANSURETHRAL NEPHROLITHOTRIPSY USING A URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH
SILODOSIN FOR PASSIVE URETERAL DILATION PRIOR TO TRANSURETHRAL NEPHROLITHOTRIPSY USING A URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH
Introduction. Urolithiasis is a common condition characterized by increased prevalence and recurrence rates. Modern treatment methods include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,...

