Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Prophylactic ureteral stenting in open surgery for deep pelvic malignancies: A simple step to enhance hemostasis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) is a severe complication in surgery for deep pelvic malignancies. The utility of prophylactic ureteral stenting (PUS) to mitigate this risk remains controversial. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the clinical value of PUS on intraoperative outcomes, including ureteral injury rates, blood loss, and the ease of surgical dissection and repair.
Methods
A retrospective review of 108 patients undergoing open surgery for deep pelvic malignancies. Patients were divided into two groups: the PUS group (n = 56), who received a preoperative ureteral stent, or the non-stented control group (n = 52). The primary outcome was the incidence of IUI. Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications. Data were analyzed using t-tests and Chi-square tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.
Results
IUI was identified in 20/56 (35.7%) patients in the PUS group and 10/52 (19.2%) in the non-stented group. All injuries in the PUS group were identified and repaired intraoperatively. The PUS group demonstrated significantly lower mean intraoperative blood loss than the non-stented group (823.21 vs. 1232.08 ml; p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in mean operative time between the groups (241 min vs. 237 min; p = 0.769). The stented group also had significantly fewer patients with positive lymph nodes (p = 0.009) and required less adjuvant therapy (p = 0.0006), suggesting baseline differences in case complexity.
Conclusion
Prophylactic ureteral stenting did not reduce the incidence of iatrogenic ureteral injury; a higher injury rate was observed in the stented group, likely reflecting a selection bias for higher-risk cases. However, PUS was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss and facilitated immediate injury recognition and repair. These findings support a selective, rather than routine, application of PUS, reserving it for patients with complex pelvic anatomy where ureteral identification is anticipated to be challenging.
Clinical Trials registration
number is NTC05183334
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Prophylactic ureteral stenting in open surgery for deep pelvic malignancies: A simple step to enhance hemostasis
Description:
Abstract
Background
Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) is a severe complication in surgery for deep pelvic malignancies.
The utility of prophylactic ureteral stenting (PUS) to mitigate this risk remains controversial.
This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the clinical value of PUS on intraoperative outcomes, including ureteral injury rates, blood loss, and the ease of surgical dissection and repair.
Methods
A retrospective review of 108 patients undergoing open surgery for deep pelvic malignancies.
Patients were divided into two groups: the PUS group (n = 56), who received a preoperative ureteral stent, or the non-stented control group (n = 52).
The primary outcome was the incidence of IUI.
Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications.
Data were analyzed using t-tests and Chi-square tests, with p < 0.
05 considered significant.
Results
IUI was identified in 20/56 (35.
7%) patients in the PUS group and 10/52 (19.
2%) in the non-stented group.
All injuries in the PUS group were identified and repaired intraoperatively.
The PUS group demonstrated significantly lower mean intraoperative blood loss than the non-stented group (823.
21 vs.
1232.
08 ml; p = 0.
002).
There was no significant difference in mean operative time between the groups (241 min vs.
237 min; p = 0.
769).
The stented group also had significantly fewer patients with positive lymph nodes (p = 0.
009) and required less adjuvant therapy (p = 0.
0006), suggesting baseline differences in case complexity.
Conclusion
Prophylactic ureteral stenting did not reduce the incidence of iatrogenic ureteral injury; a higher injury rate was observed in the stented group, likely reflecting a selection bias for higher-risk cases.
However, PUS was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss and facilitated immediate injury recognition and repair.
These findings support a selective, rather than routine, application of PUS, reserving it for patients with complex pelvic anatomy where ureteral identification is anticipated to be challenging.
Clinical Trials registration
number is NTC05183334.
Related Results
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Effect of Preoperative Hydronephrosis on Ureteral Stenosis after Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Propensity Scores Matching Analysis
Effect of Preoperative Hydronephrosis on Ureteral Stenosis after Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Propensity Scores Matching Analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Ureteral stenosis is a serious complication after flexible ureteroscopy. Other studies have confirmed that stone impaction and intraoperative ureteral ...
Results of treatment of ureteral injuries during gynecological surgery
Results of treatment of ureteral injuries during gynecological surgery
The injure of the ureter it is one of the most frequent complications in gynecological surgery and occurs according to the literature in the 0.5-30%. There is a great variety of me...
(087) Why Should Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy be Included in Treatment of Vestibulodynia?
(087) Why Should Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy be Included in Treatment of Vestibulodynia?
Abstract
Introduction
Vestibulodynia, vulvar pain localized to the vestibule without an identifiable cause, has a multifactorial...
Ureteral Complications during Surgery
Ureteral Complications during Surgery
Historically, ureteral complications during surgery have been occurring since the earliest performances of major abdominal or pelvic surgery. In the early 1960s, few diagnostic tec...
Clinical and angiographic outcome after conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation compared with direct stenting without predilatation
Clinical and angiographic outcome after conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation compared with direct stenting without predilatation
Objective: To compare in a randomised trial the procedural and clinical outcome and long term patency of conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation versus direct ste...
Management of extrinsic malignant ureteral obstruction with urinary diversion
Management of extrinsic malignant ureteral obstruction with urinary diversion
Objective: The effectiveness of urinary diversion for patients with renal insufficiency due to extrinsic ureteral obstruction was assessed.Methods: Between 1990 and 2003, 30 male...
Clinical and angiographic outcome of directional atherectomy followed by stent implantation in de novo lesions located at the ostium of the left anterior descending coronary artery
Clinical and angiographic outcome of directional atherectomy followed by stent implantation in de novo lesions located at the ostium of the left anterior descending coronary artery
Background: Lesions located at the ostium of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) are considered an ideal target for directional atherectomy (DCA), but few data are a...

