Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

COMPARISON OF STENTED VERSUS NON-STENTED PATIENTS OF URETERIC CALCULI AFTER INTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY

View through CrossRef
Background: Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological condition resulting from crystalline deposits in the urinary tract, often manifesting as acute flank pain and lower urinary tract symptoms. Ureteral stents, commonly placed after ureteroscopic lithotripsy to ensure patency and prevent complications, may themselves cause discomfort, hematuria, and infection. Given this clinical dilemma, evaluating the necessity of routine stent placement is vital to improve postoperative recovery and patient quality of life. Objective: To compare the postoperative outcomes in terms of pain and hematuria between stented and non-stented patients undergoing ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy for ureteric calculi. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Peshawar, from August 2024 to January 2025. A total of 170 patients aged 18–65 years with confirmed unilateral ureteric calculi were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Group A (n=85) received a 6 Fr double J ureteral stent post-procedure, while Group B (n=85) did not. All patients underwent ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy using a 6 Fr ureteroscope and pneumatic lithotripter under general anesthesia. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and hematuria was defined as ≥3 red blood cells per high-power field in centrifuged urine. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v23, with p-values ≤0.05 considered significant. Results: The mean VAS pain score in the non-stented group was significantly lower (3.2 ± 1.7) compared to the stented group (5.8 ± 2.1), p<0.001. Mild pain was reported in 61.2% of non-stented patients versus 22.4% in stented patients, while severe pain occurred in only 4.7% of non-stented compared to 34.1% of stented patients. Hematuria was present in 28.2% of the non-stented group versus 50.6% of the stented group (p=0.002). Conclusion: Routine ureteral stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy significantly increases postoperative discomfort and hematuria. A selective, risk-based stent placement strategy may offer safer, more comfortable recovery and optimized resource utilization.
Title: COMPARISON OF STENTED VERSUS NON-STENTED PATIENTS OF URETERIC CALCULI AFTER INTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY
Description:
Background: Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological condition resulting from crystalline deposits in the urinary tract, often manifesting as acute flank pain and lower urinary tract symptoms.
Ureteral stents, commonly placed after ureteroscopic lithotripsy to ensure patency and prevent complications, may themselves cause discomfort, hematuria, and infection.
Given this clinical dilemma, evaluating the necessity of routine stent placement is vital to improve postoperative recovery and patient quality of life.
Objective: To compare the postoperative outcomes in terms of pain and hematuria between stented and non-stented patients undergoing ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy for ureteric calculi.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, Peshawar, from August 2024 to January 2025.
A total of 170 patients aged 18–65 years with confirmed unilateral ureteric calculi were enrolled and randomized into two groups.
Group A (n=85) received a 6 Fr double J ureteral stent post-procedure, while Group B (n=85) did not.
All patients underwent ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy using a 6 Fr ureteroscope and pneumatic lithotripter under general anesthesia.
Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and hematuria was defined as ≥3 red blood cells per high-power field in centrifuged urine.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v23, with p-values ≤0.
05 considered significant.
Results: The mean VAS pain score in the non-stented group was significantly lower (3.
2 ± 1.
7) compared to the stented group (5.
8 ± 2.
1), p<0.
001.
Mild pain was reported in 61.
2% of non-stented patients versus 22.
4% in stented patients, while severe pain occurred in only 4.
7% of non-stented compared to 34.
1% of stented patients.
Hematuria was present in 28.
2% of the non-stented group versus 50.
6% of the stented group (p=0.
002).
Conclusion: Routine ureteral stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy significantly increases postoperative discomfort and hematuria.
A selective, risk-based stent placement strategy may offer safer, more comfortable recovery and optimized resource utilization.

Related Results

Comparison of Hospital Stay in Stented Versus Non-Stented Pyeloplasty in Children with Pelviureteric Junction Obstruction
Comparison of Hospital Stay in Stented Versus Non-Stented Pyeloplasty in Children with Pelviureteric Junction Obstruction
Objective: To compare the average hospital, stay between stented vs non-stented pyeloplasty in children with hydronephrosis due to pelviureteric junction obstruction at our setup. ...
LASER LITHOTRIPSY VS PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY IN URETERIC STONE REMOVAL: A CONTROLLED TRIAL
LASER LITHOTRIPSY VS PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY IN URETERIC STONE REMOVAL: A CONTROLLED TRIAL
Ureteric stones represent a significant proportion of urolithiasis cases and are a common cause of emergency department visits worldwide. Minimally invasive endourological techniqu...
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Urolithiasis is a prevailing urological condition, with ureteric stones affecting around 22% of cases, mostly causing severe pain and other complications. Surveillance, medical the...
Efficacy of tamsolusin hydrochloride as medical expulsive therapy in lower ureteric calculi < 9mm in adults.
Efficacy of tamsolusin hydrochloride as medical expulsive therapy in lower ureteric calculi < 9mm in adults.
Objectives: To determine the efficacy of Tamsolusin Hydrochloride as medical expulsive therapy in removal of lower ureteric calculi < 9 mm in adults. Study Design: Cross-section...
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
<i>Objectives:</i> This study was undertaken to compare the results of laser (Ho:YAG) and pneumatic (ballistic) intracorporeal lithotripsy for ureteric calculi in terms...
Efficacy of Holmium Laser vs Pneumatic Lithotripsy for Mid and Distal Ureteric Stones Above 10 Mm Size
Efficacy of Holmium Laser vs Pneumatic Lithotripsy for Mid and Distal Ureteric Stones Above 10 Mm Size
Abstract Introduction Over the past 15 years, ureteral stone treatment has evolved significantly. Management now depends on stone size, location, composition, patient circu...
A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING OUTCOME OF STENTED VERSUS NON-STENTED URSL
A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING OUTCOME OF STENTED VERSUS NON-STENTED URSL
Purpose: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is procedure of choice for managing ureteric calculi. However placing ureteric stent after every URSL is controversial. Routine stenting e...

Back to Top