Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

URERTEROSCOPIC LASER LITHOTRIPSY IS BETTER THAN PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY FOR URETRIC STONES

View through CrossRef
Background: Among various intra-corporeal lithotripters, pneumatic lithotripter has become the widely used tool for the treatment of urinary stones. Recently the holmium: YAG laser has been used with a wide range of potential urological applications, including intra-corporeal lithotripsy of urinary calculi. Aims and objective: Compare the effectiveness and complications of treatment for ureteric stones between holmium laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy. Material and Methods: Comparison of 100 patients presented with ureteric stones, group one (50) of whom were treated with pneumatic lithotripsy and group two (50) with holmium laser was done and the effectiveness and complications of both were analyzed. Results: There was no difference in patient age, sex, stone size and location of stones between the two groups. The immediate stone free rates were 86% in the holmium: YAG group and 64% in the pneumatic lithotripsy group (p = 0.011).. The mean operative time in the holmium: YAG group (35.7±3.2) was shorter than those with pneumatic lithotripsy group (50.2±5.3). Postoperative stay in hospital was less than 24 hours in holmium: YAG group (74%) and shorter than those for pneumatic group (36%) (p < 0.002). Post treatment complications such as ureteral perforation were encountered in only three patients who underwent pneumatic lithotripsy. Other complications, such as mucosal injury, ureteral perforation and postoperative fever; there was no statistically signicant difference between the two groups. While light hematuria was found more frequently in the pneumatic group (10%) in comparison to laser group (4%) (p = 0.045). On the other hand, the overall complication rates between the two groups was statistically signicant (10%) laser group vs. (36%) pneumatic group (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy was associated with shorter operation time and postoperative hospitalization period. We believe that Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy is an excellent treatment modality for managing ureteral calculi in central Rajasthan where stone formation rate is quite high. Drawback of holmium laser lithotripsy is its cost and maintainance
Title: URERTEROSCOPIC LASER LITHOTRIPSY IS BETTER THAN PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY FOR URETRIC STONES
Description:
Background: Among various intra-corporeal lithotripters, pneumatic lithotripter has become the widely used tool for the treatment of urinary stones.
Recently the holmium: YAG laser has been used with a wide range of potential urological applications, including intra-corporeal lithotripsy of urinary calculi.
Aims and objective: Compare the effectiveness and complications of treatment for ureteric stones between holmium laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy.
Material and Methods: Comparison of 100 patients presented with ureteric stones, group one (50) of whom were treated with pneumatic lithotripsy and group two (50) with holmium laser was done and the effectiveness and complications of both were analyzed.
Results: There was no difference in patient age, sex, stone size and location of stones between the two groups.
The immediate stone free rates were 86% in the holmium: YAG group and 64% in the pneumatic lithotripsy group (p = 0.
011).
The mean operative time in the holmium: YAG group (35.
7±3.
2) was shorter than those with pneumatic lithotripsy group (50.
2±5.
3).
Postoperative stay in hospital was less than 24 hours in holmium: YAG group (74%) and shorter than those for pneumatic group (36%) (p < 0.
002).
Post treatment complications such as ureteral perforation were encountered in only three patients who underwent pneumatic lithotripsy.
Other complications, such as mucosal injury, ureteral perforation and postoperative fever; there was no statistically signicant difference between the two groups.
While light hematuria was found more frequently in the pneumatic group (10%) in comparison to laser group (4%) (p = 0.
045).
On the other hand, the overall complication rates between the two groups was statistically signicant (10%) laser group vs.
(36%) pneumatic group (p = 0.
002).
Conclusions: Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy was associated with shorter operation time and postoperative hospitalization period.
We believe that Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy is an excellent treatment modality for managing ureteral calculi in central Rajasthan where stone formation rate is quite high.
Drawback of holmium laser lithotripsy is its cost and maintainance.

Related Results

LASER LITHOTRIPSY VS PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY IN URETERIC STONE REMOVAL: A CONTROLLED TRIAL
LASER LITHOTRIPSY VS PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY IN URETERIC STONE REMOVAL: A CONTROLLED TRIAL
Ureteric stones represent a significant proportion of urolithiasis cases and are a common cause of emergency department visits worldwide. Minimally invasive endourological techniqu...
Efficacy of Holmium Laser vs Pneumatic Lithotripsy for Mid and Distal Ureteric Stones Above 10 Mm Size
Efficacy of Holmium Laser vs Pneumatic Lithotripsy for Mid and Distal Ureteric Stones Above 10 Mm Size
Abstract Introduction Over the past 15 years, ureteral stone treatment has evolved significantly. Management now depends on stone size, location, composition, patient circu...
COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PNEUMATIC VERSUS LASER LITHOTRIPSY IN URETERIC STONES
COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PNEUMATIC VERSUS LASER LITHOTRIPSY IN URETERIC STONES
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Treatments for ureteral calculi evolve, over the past decades from open ureterolithotomy to minimally invasive procedures. Objective of this study is to...
COMPARISON OF PNEUMATIC AND EMS SWISS TRILOGY LITHOTRIPSY IN CONVENTIONAL PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
COMPARISON OF PNEUMATIC AND EMS SWISS TRILOGY LITHOTRIPSY IN CONVENTIONAL PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
Background: Renal calculi are a significant urological burden globally, with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) being the treatment of choice for large stones. Intracorporeal lith...
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
<i>Objectives:</i> This study was undertaken to compare the results of laser (Ho:YAG) and pneumatic (ballistic) intracorporeal lithotripsy for ureteric calculi in terms...
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Urolithiasis is a prevailing urological condition, with ureteric stones affecting around 22% of cases, mostly causing severe pain and other complications. Surveillance, medical the...
Efficacy of holmium laser versus pneumatic lithotripsy for mid and distal ureteric stones above 10 mm size
Efficacy of holmium laser versus pneumatic lithotripsy for mid and distal ureteric stones above 10 mm size
Background: Over the past decade, ureteral stone treatment has evolved significantly. Pneumatic lithotripsy is common but prone to stone migration. Holmium laser use has increased ...

Back to Top