Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundThe understanding of mechanisms of osseointegration as well as applied knowledge about oral implant surfaces are of paramount importance for successful clinical results.PurposeThe aim of the present article is to present an overview of osseointegration mechanisms and an introduction to surface innovations with relevance for osseointegration that will be published in the same supplement of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research.Materials and MethodsThe present article is a narrative review of some osseointegration and implant surface‐related details.Results and ConclusionsOsseointegration has a changed definition since it is realized today that oral implants are but foreign bodies and that this fact explains osseointegration as a protection mechanism of the tissues. Given adequate stability, bone tissue is formed around titanium implants to shield them from the tissues. Oral implant surfaces may be characterized by microroughness and nanoroughness, by surface chemical composition and by physical and mechanical parameters. An isotropic, moderately rough implant surface such as seen on the TiUnite device has displayed improved clinical results compared to previously used minimally rough or rough surfaces. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting any particular type of nanoroughness pattern that, at best, is documented with results from animal studies. It is possible, but as yet unproven, that clinical results may be supported by a certain chemical composition of the implant surface. The same can be said with respect to hydrophilicity of implant surfaces; positive animal data may suggest some promise, but there is a lack of clinical evidence that hydrophilic implants result in improved clinical outcome of more hydrophobic surfaces. With respect to mechanical properties, it seems obvious that those must be encompassing the loading of oral implants, but we need more research on the mechanically ideal implant surface from a clinical aspect.
Title: On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces
Description:
AbstractBackgroundThe understanding of mechanisms of osseointegration as well as applied knowledge about oral implant surfaces are of paramount importance for successful clinical results.
PurposeThe aim of the present article is to present an overview of osseointegration mechanisms and an introduction to surface innovations with relevance for osseointegration that will be published in the same supplement of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research.
Materials and MethodsThe present article is a narrative review of some osseointegration and implant surface‐related details.
Results and ConclusionsOsseointegration has a changed definition since it is realized today that oral implants are but foreign bodies and that this fact explains osseointegration as a protection mechanism of the tissues.
Given adequate stability, bone tissue is formed around titanium implants to shield them from the tissues.
Oral implant surfaces may be characterized by microroughness and nanoroughness, by surface chemical composition and by physical and mechanical parameters.
An isotropic, moderately rough implant surface such as seen on the TiUnite device has displayed improved clinical results compared to previously used minimally rough or rough surfaces.
However, there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting any particular type of nanoroughness pattern that, at best, is documented with results from animal studies.
It is possible, but as yet unproven, that clinical results may be supported by a certain chemical composition of the implant surface.
The same can be said with respect to hydrophilicity of implant surfaces; positive animal data may suggest some promise, but there is a lack of clinical evidence that hydrophilic implants result in improved clinical outcome of more hydrophobic surfaces.
With respect to mechanical properties, it seems obvious that those must be encompassing the loading of oral implants, but we need more research on the mechanically ideal implant surface from a clinical aspect.

Related Results

Surface Modification of Dental Implants - A Review
Surface Modification of Dental Implants - A Review
The use of dental implants for the replacement of missing teeth has increased in the last 30 years. The success rates for implant placement depend on a series of both biological an...
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Dental implants have shown to be a reliable tool for single, multiple and full-arch rehabilitations 1. Dental implants have a very high success rate in terms of osseointegration, h...
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Abstract Background Long-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone d...
Low Intensity Thermal Stimulation to Enhance Early Osteointegration in Implants: A Preclinical Study in Rabbits
Low Intensity Thermal Stimulation to Enhance Early Osteointegration in Implants: A Preclinical Study in Rabbits
ABSTRACTObjectivesThis study is the first to integrate 3D finite element modeling, in vitro validation, and preclinical animal experiments to determine the efficacy of low‐intensit...
Soft tissue features of peri‐implant diseases and related treatment
Soft tissue features of peri‐implant diseases and related treatment
AbstractBackgroundThe need for soft tissue grafting at implant sites for preventing and treating peri‐implant diseases is a currently investigated and debated topic.PurposeThe aim ...
Promoting osseointegration with electrical stimulation: a review
Promoting osseointegration with electrical stimulation: a review
Electrical stimulation has shown to be a promising approach for promoting osseointegration in bone-anchored implants, where osseointegration defines the biological bonding between ...

Back to Top