Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Traces of language contact in Niya Prakrit

View through CrossRef
Niya Prakrit, a dialect of Central Asian Gāndhārī, served as the administrative language of the former Shanshan kingdom (3rd–4th century CE; Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Northwest China). The corpus consists of around 1,000 administrative documents and letters. Niels Schoubben presents the first comprehensive study of language contact in Niya Prakrit, highlighting the profound influence exerted by Iranian languages. Through a systematic analysis of over 100 loanwords, Niels Schoubben demonstrates that most Iranian elements derive from Bactrian, a Middle Iranian language formerly spoken in present-day Afghanistan. He further argues that Bactrian also influenced Niya Prakrit’s grammatical structure, particularly its past tense constructions. Earlier claims of substrate influence from an unattested sister language of Tocharian A and B (the so-called “Tocharian C”) are reassessed and found to be unconvincing. Instead, the author proposes that Niya Prakrit acquired its distinctive features through its use as a chancellery idiom by Kushan officials who spoke Bactrian as a native language. The volume concludes with three appendices and detailed indices and will be of interest to Indologists, Iranianists, Indo-Europeanists, and historians of Central Asia.
Title: Traces of language contact in Niya Prakrit
Description:
Niya Prakrit, a dialect of Central Asian Gāndhārī, served as the administrative language of the former Shanshan kingdom (3rd–4th century CE; Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Northwest China).
The corpus consists of around 1,000 administrative documents and letters.
Niels Schoubben presents the first comprehensive study of language contact in Niya Prakrit, highlighting the profound influence exerted by Iranian languages.
Through a systematic analysis of over 100 loanwords, Niels Schoubben demonstrates that most Iranian elements derive from Bactrian, a Middle Iranian language formerly spoken in present-day Afghanistan.
He further argues that Bactrian also influenced Niya Prakrit’s grammatical structure, particularly its past tense constructions.
Earlier claims of substrate influence from an unattested sister language of Tocharian A and B (the so-called “Tocharian C”) are reassessed and found to be unconvincing.
Instead, the author proposes that Niya Prakrit acquired its distinctive features through its use as a chancellery idiom by Kushan officials who spoke Bactrian as a native language.
The volume concludes with three appendices and detailed indices and will be of interest to Indologists, Iranianists, Indo-Europeanists, and historians of Central Asia.

Related Results

Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
<p><em><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-langua...
Učinak poučavanja razrednomu jeziku u izobrazbi nastavnika njemačkoga
Učinak poučavanja razrednomu jeziku u izobrazbi nastavnika njemačkoga
The actual use of classroom language is principally limited to the classroom environment. As far as foreign language learning is concerned, the classroom often turns out to be the ...
CHAPTER 6 The “Tocharian C” hypothesis
CHAPTER 6 The “Tocharian C” hypothesis
The data presented in Chapters 3–5 allow for the conclusion that Bactrian and other Iranian languages had a profound influence on Niya Prakrit. Yet, it has been argued that Niya Pr...
APPENDIX 1 Greek loanwords in Niya Prakrit
APPENDIX 1 Greek loanwords in Niya Prakrit
Chapter 3 treated the etymology of two Niya Prakrit words which seem to have originated in Greek but must have been borrowed via a Bactrian intermediary, i.e. ks ̄una ‘date, reign,...
CHAPTER 5 Grammatical loans from Bactrian
CHAPTER 5 Grammatical loans from Bactrian
This fifth chapter examines potential instances of grammatical loans from Iranian languages into Niya Prakrit, with a particular focus on features likely adopted from Bactrian. Aft...
CHAPTER 7 A sociolinguistic scenario
CHAPTER 7 A sociolinguistic scenario
This chapter briefly addresses the fourth research question formulated in §1.2: which sociolinguistic scenario accounts best for the Bactrian influence on Niya Prakrit? In §7.1, th...
RUSSIAN BORROWINGS IN CHINESE IN TERMS OF LANGUAGE CONTACT
RUSSIAN BORROWINGS IN CHINESE IN TERMS OF LANGUAGE CONTACT
The language is an instrument of contact and communication between peoples of all countries in the world. «Language contact» is a result of frequent communication between native sp...

Back to Top