Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Aortic Valve Replacement: Current Prevalence and Clinical Predictors

View through CrossRef
Background: The incidence of conduction disease requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation following aortic valve replacement (AVR) ranges from 3% to 6%. Data concerning the potential risks for PPM requirement associated with certain valve types have been conflicting and controversial. We sought to evaluate the prevalence, predictors for PPM implantation, and PPM dependency during follow‐up in patients undergoing AVR. Methods: A total of 214 consecutive patients undergoing AVR were studied retrospectively. A total of 207 patients were included in the statistical analysis. Clinical variables including valve size and types were catalogued and the incidence of PPM evaluated. Cardiac rhythm device clinic records were examined and PPM dependency status was catalogued. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of PPM implantation and PPM dependency during follow‐up. Results: Fifteen patients (7.2%) required PPM postoperatively. After controlling for clinical and surgical characteristics, predictors for PPM included preoperative first‐degree atrioventricular block with and without left anterior fascicular block or intraventricular conduction delay [odd ratios (OR) = 12.5, P = 0.001], cardiac arrest postoperatively (OR = 9.4, P = 0.012), and combined aortic and mitral valve surgery (OR = 11.5, P = 0.027). Aortic valve types did not predict complete heart block (CHB) and PPM implantation. Of those patients who underwent PPM implantation, 70% were classified as PPM dependent during long‐term follow‐up. Conclusion: CHB and PPM implantation continue to be common complications of AVR. Preexisting atrioventricular with intrafascicular or intraventricular conduction disease along with cardiac arrest and dual valve surgery are the most important significant predictors of PPM implantation and PPM dependency during follow‐up. The selection of valve types did not predict conduction disease requiring PPM implantation.
Title: Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Aortic Valve Replacement: Current Prevalence and Clinical Predictors
Description:
Background: The incidence of conduction disease requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation following aortic valve replacement (AVR) ranges from 3% to 6%.
Data concerning the potential risks for PPM requirement associated with certain valve types have been conflicting and controversial.
We sought to evaluate the prevalence, predictors for PPM implantation, and PPM dependency during follow‐up in patients undergoing AVR.
Methods: A total of 214 consecutive patients undergoing AVR were studied retrospectively.
A total of 207 patients were included in the statistical analysis.
Clinical variables including valve size and types were catalogued and the incidence of PPM evaluated.
Cardiac rhythm device clinic records were examined and PPM dependency status was catalogued.
Multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of PPM implantation and PPM dependency during follow‐up.
Results: Fifteen patients (7.
2%) required PPM postoperatively.
After controlling for clinical and surgical characteristics, predictors for PPM included preoperative first‐degree atrioventricular block with and without left anterior fascicular block or intraventricular conduction delay [odd ratios (OR) = 12.
5, P = 0.
001], cardiac arrest postoperatively (OR = 9.
4, P = 0.
012), and combined aortic and mitral valve surgery (OR = 11.
5, P = 0.
027).
Aortic valve types did not predict complete heart block (CHB) and PPM implantation.
Of those patients who underwent PPM implantation, 70% were classified as PPM dependent during long‐term follow‐up.
Conclusion: CHB and PPM implantation continue to be common complications of AVR.
Preexisting atrioventricular with intrafascicular or intraventricular conduction disease along with cardiac arrest and dual valve surgery are the most important significant predictors of PPM implantation and PPM dependency during follow‐up.
The selection of valve types did not predict conduction disease requiring PPM implantation.

Related Results

AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
Objectives To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia. ...
When valve needs electrical wires - estimating pacemaker implantation after TAVR
When valve needs electrical wires - estimating pacemaker implantation after TAVR
Abstract Introduction Widespread availability and expanded indication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) modified ...
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Background Aortic root dilatation and aortic insufficiency can occur in patients with prior conotruncal defect surgery, the Ross procedure, and connective tissue disease (CTD). Val...
Infective endocarditis of quadricuspid aortic valve
Infective endocarditis of quadricuspid aortic valve
Abstract Background Infective endocarditis of the aortic valve is a relatively common disease presentation, with surgical intervention a mainstay of...
Prevalence of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis, Low Flow And Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From a Cath-Lab Data Base.
Prevalence of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis, Low Flow And Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From a Cath-Lab Data Base.
AbstractRecent echocardiographic studies described that almost 30% of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis on the basis of aortic valve area may paradoxically have a relative...

Back to Top