Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Thomas Kuhn's Science Paradigm
View through CrossRef
Thomas Kuhn's thinking in this case is used as an analytical knife to see the revolution in science and education in general. For Thomas Kuhn, the history of science is a starting point in studying fundamental issues in scientific epistemology because science is basically always marked by a strong scientific paradigm and revolution afterward. The purpose of this study is to find out the philosophical foundations of Thomas S. Kuhn's scientific paradigm. The method used is a qualitative approach by applying a descriptive-analytical method. The results of this study show that, according to Kuhn, a paradigm is a set of beliefs, values, methods, and practices that are widely accepted by the scientific community.
Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University of Bandung
Title: Thomas Kuhn's Science Paradigm
Description:
Thomas Kuhn's thinking in this case is used as an analytical knife to see the revolution in science and education in general.
For Thomas Kuhn, the history of science is a starting point in studying fundamental issues in scientific epistemology because science is basically always marked by a strong scientific paradigm and revolution afterward.
The purpose of this study is to find out the philosophical foundations of Thomas S.
Kuhn's scientific paradigm.
The method used is a qualitative approach by applying a descriptive-analytical method.
The results of this study show that, according to Kuhn, a paradigm is a set of beliefs, values, methods, and practices that are widely accepted by the scientific community.
Related Results
Thomas S. Kuhn
Thomas S. Kuhn
Thomas Kuhn (b. 1922–d. 1996) was an American historian and philosopher of science. He completed a Ph.D. in physics at Harvard University. While a student at Harvard, Kuhn worked a...
Karl Popper’s Critique of Thomas Kuhn’s Concept of Normal Science: An Evaluation
Karl Popper’s Critique of Thomas Kuhn’s Concept of Normal Science: An Evaluation
This article focuses on an evaluation of Karl Popper’s critique of Thomas Kuhn’s concept of normal science. Kuhn describes normal science as paradigm-based research in which scient...
Paul Feyerabend and Thomas Kuhn
Paul Feyerabend and Thomas Kuhn
Abstract
In this chapter, I want to discuss several aspects of the relationship between Paul Feyerabend and Thomas Kuhn. There are seven sections. The next section w...
Paradigms and scientific revolutions in epidemiology
Paradigms and scientific revolutions in epidemiology
The article analyses the philosophical ideas of the American historian and philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn; who introduced such key concepts as “paradigm” and “paradigm shift” i...
Thomas S. Kuhn and the Transformation of the Concept of “Scientific Progress”
Thomas S. Kuhn and the Transformation of the Concept of “Scientific Progress”
Bu çalışmanın amacı Thomas Kuhn’un bilimsel ilerleme kavrayışının tarihsel süreç içerisinde nasıl değişip ve dönüştüğünü ortaya koymaktır. Kuhn’un 1962 yılında yayınladığı Bilimsel...
Epistemologi Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn (Pemikiran dan Relevansinya Terhadap Kajian Keilmuan Islam)
Epistemologi Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn (Pemikiran dan Relevansinya Terhadap Kajian Keilmuan Islam)
Thomas Kuhn menjadi salah satu filsuf, ilmuan yang unik dalam memberikan nama bagi istilah yang ia gunakan dalam model keilmuannya. Kuhn memakai istilah “revolusi”, untuk mempere...
Feyerabend’s Criticisms of Kuhn
Feyerabend’s Criticisms of Kuhn
This paper gives an account of Feyerabend’s criticisms of Kuhn. The main exposition of these criticisms is in Feyerabend’s paper in the 1970 collection Criticism and the Growth of ...
FILSAFAT ILMU KARL R. POPPER DAN THOMAS S. KUHN SERTA IMPLIKASINYA DALAM PENGAJARAN ILMU
FILSAFAT ILMU KARL R. POPPER DAN THOMAS S. KUHN SERTA IMPLIKASINYA DALAM PENGAJARAN ILMU
This article discusses about philosophy of science according to Karl R. Popper and Thomas S. Kuhn. There are similarities and differences between their views about how progress and...

