Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Sweden and the Petsamo-Kirkenes Offensive, October 1944 — January 1945
View through CrossRef
The article deals with the problems of war and post-war Europe and the role of Sweden in the European relations in this period. The Petsamo-Kirkenes offensive and the Soviet Union military advance into northern Norway revealed the new situation when Sweden’s neutrality began to shift from adaption to Germany towards a more pro-allied stance. In these circumstances the Swedish neutrality was under the severe test: some of the cabinet ministers worried that this opportunistic shift in neutrality policy would affect the country’s international image after the war. Yet the reality imposed its conditions. This applied to the Sweden’s efforts to get Finland out of the war, reception of refugees from Finnish and Norwegian territories, ferrying wounded German soldiers across their territory. As the USSR had more military success in Lapland and Northern Norway in Swedish political and military circles increased fears about the future of the country and the post-war order. After the war, the Defense Staff stated, two antagonistic, global alliances would dominate the international system and it would be difficult for small powers like Sweden to remain neutral or independent in this environment. For Sweden to join any of the two great power blocs would obviously entail major risks. The creation of a Scandinavian defensive alliance was considered as an alternative to neutrality. Thus, it was the Petsamo-Kirkenes offensive and the advance of the USSR to the West that caused serious reflections in the political life of Sweden about the future, about how a small country should act and survive in the conditions of the continuing ideological conflict of the great powers.
Title: Sweden and the Petsamo-Kirkenes Offensive, October 1944 — January 1945
Description:
The article deals with the problems of war and post-war Europe and the role of Sweden in the European relations in this period.
The Petsamo-Kirkenes offensive and the Soviet Union military advance into northern Norway revealed the new situation when Sweden’s neutrality began to shift from adaption to Germany towards a more pro-allied stance.
In these circumstances the Swedish neutrality was under the severe test: some of the cabinet ministers worried that this opportunistic shift in neutrality policy would affect the country’s international image after the war.
Yet the reality imposed its conditions.
This applied to the Sweden’s efforts to get Finland out of the war, reception of refugees from Finnish and Norwegian territories, ferrying wounded German soldiers across their territory.
As the USSR had more military success in Lapland and Northern Norway in Swedish political and military circles increased fears about the future of the country and the post-war order.
After the war, the Defense Staff stated, two antagonistic, global alliances would dominate the international system and it would be difficult for small powers like Sweden to remain neutral or independent in this environment.
For Sweden to join any of the two great power blocs would obviously entail major risks.
The creation of a Scandinavian defensive alliance was considered as an alternative to neutrality.
Thus, it was the Petsamo-Kirkenes offensive and the advance of the USSR to the West that caused serious reflections in the political life of Sweden about the future, about how a small country should act and survive in the conditions of the continuing ideological conflict of the great powers.
Related Results
Identification of “Hot Spots” of COVID-19 in the United States (January 2020-January 2021)
Identification of “Hot Spots” of COVID-19 in the United States (January 2020-January 2021)
Objective To examine the sociodemographic factors associated with US metropolitan or micropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and how the socio...
October before October
October before October
Rachel Churner introduces essays by Annette Michelson and Rosalind Krauss on Soviet cinema, reprinted in conjunction with the centennial of the October revolution. Published in the...
The Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Circus between 1944 and 1957
The Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Circus between 1944 and 1957
This article analyzes the process of institutionalization of the Bulgarian circus be-tween 1944 and 1957. The appreciation of circus as “an equal member of the large family of soci...
The Brisbane Years of Laurence Collinson
The Brisbane Years of Laurence Collinson
The autumn 1944 ‘Ern Malley’ edition of Max Harris's Angry Penguins was a defining moment in Australian cultural history for more than one reason. To add to the exposure of the Mal...
Kasserine and January
Kasserine and January
The city of Kasserine, in the central-west region of Tunisia, which has long been the epicenter of protest against the policies of Ben Ali’s government, erupted into full-scale ins...
Notes from the Editors, January 2015
Notes from the Editors, January 2015
<div class="buynow"><a title="Back issue of Monthly Review, January 2015 (Volume 66, Number 8)" href="http://monthlyreview.org/back-issues/mr-066-08-2015-01/">buy this ...
Montage October: Dialectic of the Shot
Montage October: Dialectic of the Shot
In “Montage October,” which appeared in Artforum in January 1973, Rosalind Krauss argues that Sergei Eisenstein's 1928 film was not only a celebration of a Marxist victory but also...
The intertwining – Damisch, Bois, and October’s rethinking of painting
The intertwining – Damisch, Bois, and October’s rethinking of painting
While most of Hubert Damisch’s major books have been made available in English since the publication of Yve-Alain Bois’ review essay ‘Painting as model’, it nonetheless remains a s...