Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Circus between 1944 and 1957

View through CrossRef
This article analyzes the process of institutionalization of the Bulgarian circus be-tween 1944 and 1957. The appreciation of circus as “an equal member of the large family of socialist arts” was rooted in a belief that it was a democratic spectacle which transcended social divisions and classes. The source of the perception of the circus as an instrument of social change can be traced to pre-war Soviet tradition, when the circus became not only a tool of state cultural policy, but also inspired the most important creators of literary and theater avant-garde. In post-war Bulgaria, in order to improve the quality of performances, interinstitutional cooperation of the circus with literary and theater circles was initiated, and with the purchase of circuses by the state, numerous regulations were introduced in the profession of a circus artist. This purchase was not synonymous with nationalization: the state bought the circuses from the hands of their pre-war owners, allowing them to continue to perform strategic functions in the circuses.At the same time, despite deep institutional changes, the circus after 1944 main-tained its semi-peripheral status of an entertainment spectacle, not worth considering on the part of intellectual elites and unfit for the project of national high art. It is this peripheral potential of the circus as a spectacle not shaped by the refinement of the elites, that opens up new research perspectives which allow us to view the circus as a laboratory of social and cultural change. As a nomadic travelling institution, the circus crossed geographical boundaries and communicated with viewers from cities and villages, as well as representatives of various social groups and strata. On the other hand, multiethnic, international environment of the circus was a space for inten-sive transfer and intercultural dialogue, both in the artistic dimension and in the sphere of everyday interpersonal practices.
Southwest University Neofit Rilski
Title: The Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Circus between 1944 and 1957
Description:
This article analyzes the process of institutionalization of the Bulgarian circus be-tween 1944 and 1957.
The appreciation of circus as “an equal member of the large family of socialist arts” was rooted in a belief that it was a democratic spectacle which transcended social divisions and classes.
The source of the perception of the circus as an instrument of social change can be traced to pre-war Soviet tradition, when the circus became not only a tool of state cultural policy, but also inspired the most important creators of literary and theater avant-garde.
In post-war Bulgaria, in order to improve the quality of performances, interinstitutional cooperation of the circus with literary and theater circles was initiated, and with the purchase of circuses by the state, numerous regulations were introduced in the profession of a circus artist.
This purchase was not synonymous with nationalization: the state bought the circuses from the hands of their pre-war owners, allowing them to continue to perform strategic functions in the circuses.
At the same time, despite deep institutional changes, the circus after 1944 main-tained its semi-peripheral status of an entertainment spectacle, not worth considering on the part of intellectual elites and unfit for the project of national high art.
It is this peripheral potential of the circus as a spectacle not shaped by the refinement of the elites, that opens up new research perspectives which allow us to view the circus as a laboratory of social and cultural change.
As a nomadic travelling institution, the circus crossed geographical boundaries and communicated with viewers from cities and villages, as well as representatives of various social groups and strata.
On the other hand, multiethnic, international environment of the circus was a space for inten-sive transfer and intercultural dialogue, both in the artistic dimension and in the sphere of everyday interpersonal practices.

Related Results

Circus Training for Autistic Children: Difference, Creativity, and Community
Circus Training for Autistic Children: Difference, Creativity, and Community
Circus training can benefit children diagnosed on the autistic spectrum and their families. In 2010, as Head Trainer at Flipside Circus in Brisbane, Kristy Seymour developed a meth...
The Circus in Ruins: A Comment on “Lion on Display: Culture, Nature, and Totality in a Circus Performance,” by Yoram Carmeli
The Circus in Ruins: A Comment on “Lion on Display: Culture, Nature, and Totality in a Circus Performance,” by Yoram Carmeli
This article comments on Yoram Carmeli's stimulating analysis of the narrative structure of Captain Sidney Howes's lion act performed in Gerry Cottle's British circus. I begin by d...
Raising the Tent on Circus Research: A Review of Cirque Global: Quebec’s Expanding Circus Boundaries
Raising the Tent on Circus Research: A Review of Cirque Global: Quebec’s Expanding Circus Boundaries
Cirque Global: Quebec’s Expanding Circus Boundaries provides an in-depth survey of scholarship on contemporary circus in Quebec. This review of what will surely become a seminal te...
Circus Workshop in the chid Psychiatry
Circus Workshop in the chid Psychiatry
The following paper is about the possible psychological effects of social circus, and our experiences with teaching circus methods in children psychiatry. In the beginning the pape...
Two Questions on the Circus Flaminius
Two Questions on the Circus Flaminius
Were ludi circenses ever held in the Circus Flaminius as they were in the Circus Maximus?The evidence is as follows.1. Varro LL v 153–4: Locus idem circus maximus dictus, quod circ...
The FitzGerald Brothers’ Circus: Spectacle, Identity, and Nationhood at the Australian Circus
The FitzGerald Brothers’ Circus: Spectacle, Identity, and Nationhood at the Australian Circus
Whangarei is not the most obvious starting point for a book about the Australian circus, but that is where The FitzGerald Brothers’ Circus begins. On a cold and windy night, back i...
Talking Circus, Not Culture: The Politics of Identity in European Circus Discourse
Talking Circus, Not Culture: The Politics of Identity in European Circus Discourse
This article examines the production of circus talk as an ambiguous, even eccentric, form of identity formation. By situating this talk within the larger contexts of the ironies of...
London, Cadogan Hall and King's Place: Second London Festival of Bulgarian Culture
London, Cadogan Hall and King's Place: Second London Festival of Bulgarian Culture
One of the most enjoyable characteristics of London musical life is that it is peopled by a generous number of foreigners who, every so often, take it upon themselves to enlighten ...

Back to Top