Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Linguistic Luck
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Despite the considerable attention the topic of luck has received in ethics and epistemology, very little has been published in the philosophical literature overtly on linguistic luck. The essays collected here provide the first sustained examination of the diverse forms of linguistic luck, the mechanisms available to reduce the impact of linguistic luck, and how to cope with residual luck not eliminated by the causal, inferential, and intentional mechanisms which aim at its eradication. Of primary interest is not some, hitherto unnoticed, widespread prevalence of luck in the determinants of meaning and communication, but rather the impressive extent to which luck is reduced or eliminated therein. Whether through causal, inferential, or intentional means, the determinants of meaning and communication are impressively independent of luck and chance. In fact, it is difficult to imagine a world with human language where efforts to communicate succeed no better than chance. Linguistic communication is only possible because robust luck-reducing variables are at work. The essays collected seek to understand the diversity, scope, and mode of operation of luck-reducing mechanisms in language. While it is not possible here to cover the full range of linguistic phenomena affected by luck, a wide range of issues in linguistics and philosophy of language are investigated, including syntax processing, demonstrative reference, conversational implicature, testimony, lexical innovation, joint attention, communicative value, conventionalism vs. anti-conventionalism, metasemantic safety, and semantic skepticism, to name a few.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: Linguistic Luck
Description:
Abstract
Despite the considerable attention the topic of luck has received in ethics and epistemology, very little has been published in the philosophical literature overtly on linguistic luck.
The essays collected here provide the first sustained examination of the diverse forms of linguistic luck, the mechanisms available to reduce the impact of linguistic luck, and how to cope with residual luck not eliminated by the causal, inferential, and intentional mechanisms which aim at its eradication.
Of primary interest is not some, hitherto unnoticed, widespread prevalence of luck in the determinants of meaning and communication, but rather the impressive extent to which luck is reduced or eliminated therein.
Whether through causal, inferential, or intentional means, the determinants of meaning and communication are impressively independent of luck and chance.
In fact, it is difficult to imagine a world with human language where efforts to communicate succeed no better than chance.
Linguistic communication is only possible because robust luck-reducing variables are at work.
The essays collected seek to understand the diversity, scope, and mode of operation of luck-reducing mechanisms in language.
While it is not possible here to cover the full range of linguistic phenomena affected by luck, a wide range of issues in linguistics and philosophy of language are investigated, including syntax processing, demonstrative reference, conversational implicature, testimony, lexical innovation, joint attention, communicative value, conventionalism vs.
anti-conventionalism, metasemantic safety, and semantic skepticism, to name a few.
Related Results
Introduction
Introduction
Abstract
Despite the considerable attention the topic of luck has received in ethics and epistemology, very little has been published in the philosophical literature...
Linguistic Luck
Linguistic Luck
Abstract
§I concerns two questions: To what extent are linguistic tokens in utterances accidental relative to linguistic rules, and hence “r-lucky”? To what extent a...
Against resultant moral luck
Against resultant moral luck
AbstractDoes one's causal responsibility increase the degree of one's moral responsibility? The proponents of resultant moral luck hold that it does. Until quite recently, the caus...
Luck Egalitarianism
Luck Egalitarianism
Abstract
Luck egalitarianism is a view of distributive justice. Its central claim is that it is unjust when people are worse off through no choice or fault of their own. ...
Shaping future luck
Shaping future luck
People plan strategies to enable them to get what they want. Obviously, luck plays a part in achieving their desires. The question becomes: can one plan for that luck? As luck is n...
Postscript: Moral Luck
Postscript: Moral Luck
AbstractI outline how an analysis of epistemic luck has ramifications for the supposedly parallel debate regarding moral luck. Focusing on the two classic papers on moral luck by T...
Understanding, Luck, and Communicative Value
Understanding, Luck, and Communicative Value
Abstract
Does utterance understanding require reliable (i.e. non-lucky) recovery of the speaker’s intended proposition? There are good reasons to answer in the affir...
Epistemic Luck
Epistemic Luck
AbstractOne of the key supposed ‘platitudes’ of contemporary epistemology is the claim that knowledge excludes luck. One can see the attraction of such a claim, in that knowledge i...

