Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Periwayat Syiah dalam Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī

View through CrossRef
The article reviews the existance of Shi’ite ḥadīth narrator with various levels, in which their report narrated in Sunni authoritative ḥadīth literature namely Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. It attempts to examine the chain of transmission (sanad) in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī with various classical and contemporary rijāl al-ḥadīth books, such as Ibn Abī Ḥātim (d. 327), Ibn Ḥibbān (d. 354), Yūsuf al-Mizzī (d. 742), al-Dhahabī (d. 748), Ibn Ḥajar (d. 852), al-Suyūṭī (d. 911), Muḥammad Nāṣir al-Dīn al-Albānī (d. 1420) and Shu’ayb al-Arna’ūṭ (d. 1438), to identify the Shia narrators reported in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. By using historical approach and hadīth narrators (rijāl al-Ḥadīth) analysis, the article finds thirty-two Shia narrators, and twenty-four Rāfiḍah narrators composed in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. That is because in methodological perspective, al-Bukhārī does not put beliefs and theological affiliations of the hadīth narrators as parameters for accepting or rejecting the hadīth.
State Islamic University (UIN) of Sunan Ampel
Title: Periwayat Syiah dalam Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī
Description:
The article reviews the existance of Shi’ite ḥadīth narrator with various levels, in which their report narrated in Sunni authoritative ḥadīth literature namely Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī.
It attempts to examine the chain of transmission (sanad) in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī with various classical and contemporary rijāl al-ḥadīth books, such as Ibn Abī Ḥātim (d.
327), Ibn Ḥibbān (d.
354), Yūsuf al-Mizzī (d.
742), al-Dhahabī (d.
748), Ibn Ḥajar (d.
852), al-Suyūṭī (d.
911), Muḥammad Nāṣir al-Dīn al-Albānī (d.
1420) and Shu’ayb al-Arna’ūṭ (d.
1438), to identify the Shia narrators reported in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī.
By using historical approach and hadīth narrators (rijāl al-Ḥadīth) analysis, the article finds thirty-two Shia narrators, and twenty-four Rāfiḍah narrators composed in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī.
That is because in methodological perspective, al-Bukhārī does not put beliefs and theological affiliations of the hadīth narrators as parameters for accepting or rejecting the hadīth.

Related Results

KAEDAH KEDABITAN PERIWAYAT: KAEDAH AL-JARH WA TADHBIT
KAEDAH KEDABITAN PERIWAYAT: KAEDAH AL-JARH WA TADHBIT
Kedabitan merupakan salah satu syarat untuk dikategorikan sebagai hadis yang berkualitas sahih ataupun hasan. Akan tetapi, perlu dikaji kembali pemahaman terkait “kedabitan” yang d...
Artikulasi Hadith Muhammad Asad
Artikulasi Hadith Muhammad Asad
Abstract: This paper discusses Muhammad Asad's seminal work, Sahih al-Bukhari: The Early Years of Islam, first published in 1935 by The Arafat Publications, Srinagar, Kashmir, and ...
Hadis-Hadis Toleransi Beragama dalam Perspektif Kitab Shahih Bukhari dan Shahih Muslim
Hadis-Hadis Toleransi Beragama dalam Perspektif Kitab Shahih Bukhari dan Shahih Muslim
Religious Tolerance: on the background of the many people who do not understand the existence of differences, appreciate understandings that are different from their own, which lea...
Historical Bacground Dan Manhaj Kepenulisan Kitab Al Jami’ Al Bukhari
Historical Bacground Dan Manhaj Kepenulisan Kitab Al Jami’ Al Bukhari
Kitab Sahih al-Bukhari Merupakan kitab hadis yang dinilai paling baik dibandingkan kitab hadis yang lain. Bahkan dikatakan kedudukannya dinilai sebagai kitab hadis pertama menurut ...
ALIRAN PEMIKIRAN KEISLAMAN SYI’AH
ALIRAN PEMIKIRAN KEISLAMAN SYI’AH
Secara etimologi Syiah berasal dari bahasa Arab yaitu Syia’ah yang berarti pengikut, Syiah dapat juga beratri pengikut, pendukung, pencinta, atau dapat juga berati kelompok. Dengan...
Authority, Intellectual Networks and Politics in the Canonization of Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān
Authority, Intellectual Networks and Politics in the Canonization of Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān
This study examines the canonization process of Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān, considering that both possess similar critical authority and methodology yet hold differing r...

Back to Top