Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound‐guided bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. rectus sheath block for midline abdominal surgery in a low‐ and middle‐income country: a randomised controlled trial
View through CrossRef
Summary
Introduction
The use of erector spinae plane block and rectus sheath block for postoperative analgesia in midline abdominal procedures is becoming more common. However, the most effective and appropriate method remains unclear. We aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effecacy of ultrasound‐guided bilateral erector spinae plane blocks with rectus sheath blocks for midline abdominal surgery in a low‐ and middle‐income country.
Methods
We allocated randomly 72 patients aged 18–65 y undergoing midline abdominal surgery to an erector spinae plane block (n = 36) or a rectus sheath block (n = 36) utilising a prospective, parallel study design. Patients, care providers and outcome assessors were blinded to the interventions. The primary outcome measures were total postoperative analgesia consumption, postoperative pain severity and time to first rescue analgesic administration. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative complications and adverse events.
Results
Of 78 patients assessed for eligibility, six were excluded, leaving 72 for analysis. Patients allocated to erector spinae plane block had a lower mean (SD) postoperative opioid consumption compared with those allocated to rectus sheath block (3.5 (8.7) morphine milligram equivalents vs. 8.2 (2.8) morphine milligram equivalents, respectively; p = 0.003). Time to first analgesic request was greater in patients allocated to erector spinae plane block compared with those allocated to rectus sheath block (mean (95%CI) 16 (13–17) h vs. 12 (11–13) h, respectively; p < 0.001). There were no block‐related complications in either group.
Discussion
Erector spinae plane blocks are more effective than rectus sheath blocks for the management of postoperative pain following midline abdominal surgery. Integration of erector spinae plane blocks into multimodal opioid‐sparing analgesic strategies after midline abdominal surgeries may promote enhanced patient recovery in low‐and middle‐income countries.
Title: Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound‐guided bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. rectus sheath block for midline abdominal surgery in a low‐ and middle‐income country: a randomised controlled trial
Description:
Summary
Introduction
The use of erector spinae plane block and rectus sheath block for postoperative analgesia in midline abdominal procedures is becoming more common.
However, the most effective and appropriate method remains unclear.
We aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effecacy of ultrasound‐guided bilateral erector spinae plane blocks with rectus sheath blocks for midline abdominal surgery in a low‐ and middle‐income country.
Methods
We allocated randomly 72 patients aged 18–65 y undergoing midline abdominal surgery to an erector spinae plane block (n = 36) or a rectus sheath block (n = 36) utilising a prospective, parallel study design.
Patients, care providers and outcome assessors were blinded to the interventions.
The primary outcome measures were total postoperative analgesia consumption, postoperative pain severity and time to first rescue analgesic administration.
Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative complications and adverse events.
Results
Of 78 patients assessed for eligibility, six were excluded, leaving 72 for analysis.
Patients allocated to erector spinae plane block had a lower mean (SD) postoperative opioid consumption compared with those allocated to rectus sheath block (3.
5 (8.
7) morphine milligram equivalents vs.
8.
2 (2.
8) morphine milligram equivalents, respectively; p = 0.
003).
Time to first analgesic request was greater in patients allocated to erector spinae plane block compared with those allocated to rectus sheath block (mean (95%CI) 16 (13–17) h vs.
12 (11–13) h, respectively; p < 0.
001).
There were no block‐related complications in either group.
Discussion
Erector spinae plane blocks are more effective than rectus sheath blocks for the management of postoperative pain following midline abdominal surgery.
Integration of erector spinae plane blocks into multimodal opioid‐sparing analgesic strategies after midline abdominal surgeries may promote enhanced patient recovery in low‐and middle‐income countries.
Related Results
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Comparison Between Erector Spine Plane Block Versus Subcostal Transverse Abdominal Plane Block for Post-Operative Analgesic in Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in CMH Muzaffarabad AJK
Comparison Between Erector Spine Plane Block Versus Subcostal Transverse Abdominal Plane Block for Post-Operative Analgesic in Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in CMH Muzaffarabad AJK
Background: Adequate postoperative analgesia is crucial for enhancing patient ease and recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block and subcostal t...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: The efficacy of erector spinae plane block for thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of ...
Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Laparoscopic Kidney Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Laparoscopic Kidney Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Background: The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae plane (ESP) block are relatively new regional analgesic techniques that provide analgesia to the abdominal wall an...
ASSESSMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF RECTUS SHEATH BLOCK IN GYNECOLOGICAL LAPROSCOPIC SURGERY
ASSESSMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF RECTUS SHEATH BLOCK IN GYNECOLOGICAL LAPROSCOPIC SURGERY
Background: Gynecological laparoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive surgical technique that can cause pain and discomfort in the postoperative period. To manage this pain, vario...
Erector spinae block reduces intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized controlled trial
Erector spinae block reduces intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized controlled trial
Background: Obese patients are at increased risk of postoperative respiratory complications because of sedatives and opioids. The erector spinae block is a novel regional block tha...
Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Block in Attenuating Pneumoperitoneal Stretch Response in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surg
Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Block in Attenuating Pneumoperitoneal Stretch Response in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surg
Background: Increase in heart rate and blood pressure in response to pneumoperitoneum produced during laparoscopic abdominal surgeries is a challenging situation to anesthesiologis...

