Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

View through CrossRef
Background: The efficacy of erector spinae plane block for thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of erector spinae plane block on thoracoscopic surgery. Methods: We searched the PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through February 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), assessing the effect of erector spinae plane block on thoracoscopic surgery. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model. Results: Seven RCTs, involving 439 patients, are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with the control group for thoracoscopic surgery, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) results in significantly reduced pain scores at 1 h (standard mean difference (SMD) = –4.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) = –7.63 to –0.88; p = 0.01), 4 h (SMD = –4.08; 95% CI = –4.56 to –3.60; p < 0.00001), 8 h (SMD = –4.13; 95% CI = –4.62 to –3.65; p < 0.00001), and postoperative anesthesia consumption (SMD = –3.04; 95% CI = –4.58 to –1.50; p = 0.0001) and can decrease the incidence of nausea and vomiting (odd ratio (OR) = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.39; p < 0.001). Conclusions: ESPB can substantially enhance pain relief for thoracoscopic surgery.
Title: The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Description:
Background: The efficacy of erector spinae plane block for thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of erector spinae plane block on thoracoscopic surgery.
Methods: We searched the PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through February 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), assessing the effect of erector spinae plane block on thoracoscopic surgery.
This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model.
Results: Seven RCTs, involving 439 patients, are included in the meta-analysis.
Overall, compared with the control group for thoracoscopic surgery, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) results in significantly reduced pain scores at 1 h (standard mean difference (SMD) = –4.
26; 95% confidence interval (CI) = –7.
63 to –0.
88; p = 0.
01), 4 h (SMD = –4.
08; 95% CI = –4.
56 to –3.
60; p < 0.
00001), 8 h (SMD = –4.
13; 95% CI = –4.
62 to –3.
65; p < 0.
00001), and postoperative anesthesia consumption (SMD = –3.
04; 95% CI = –4.
58 to –1.
50; p = 0.
0001) and can decrease the incidence of nausea and vomiting (odd ratio (OR) = 0.
18; 95% CI = 0.
08 to 0.
39; p < 0.
001).
Conclusions: ESPB can substantially enhance pain relief for thoracoscopic surgery.

Related Results

Erector spinae plane block versus intercostal block in postoperative pain management of mastectomy
Erector spinae plane block versus intercostal block in postoperative pain management of mastectomy
Objectives: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy between erector spinae plane block and intercostal block following mastectomy. Study design: Randomized controlled tria...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Role of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block in postoperative pain management of mastectomy.
Role of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block in postoperative pain management of mastectomy.
Objective: To determine the role of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block by finding the time to need the first rescue analgesia in postoperative pain management of...

Back to Top