Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison Between Erector Spine Plane Block Versus Subcostal Transverse Abdominal Plane Block for Post-Operative Analgesic in Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in CMH Muzaffarabad AJK
View through CrossRef
Background: Adequate postoperative analgesia is crucial for enhancing patient ease and recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block and subcostal transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block are two regional anesthesia procedures that have added consideration for their potential to offer effective analgesia. However, a comparative analysis of these blocks in this surgical context was limited.Aim: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the erector spinae plane block versus the subcostal transverse abdominal plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: The research was led at CMH muzaffarbad ajk Hospital,from October 2023 to September 2024, involving 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at CMH Muzaffarabad, AJK. Participants were erratically allotted to receive either ESP block or the TAP block. Pain levels were evaluated by means of the visual analog scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. The total analgesic consumption and the time to first analgesic request was also recorded.Results: The results indicated that patients receiving erector spinae plane block described meaningfully lower pain scores at 1 hour (VAS 2.1 ± 0.8) and 6 hours (VAS 3.5 ± 1.2) postoperatively compared to those receiving TAP block (VAS 3.5 ± 1.0 at 1 hour; VAS 4.5 ± 1.3 at 6 hours). Additionally, the time to first analgesic request was longer in the ESP group (10.5 ± 2.4 hours) associated to TAP set (6.8 ± 1.9 hours). Total analgesic consumption was also significantly lower in the ESP group (30.0 ± 5.5 mg) versus the TAP group (45.0 ± 8.0 mg).Conclusion: The erector spinae plane block provided superior postoperative analgesia compared to subcostal transverse abdominal plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Those findings support use of ESP block as an effective analgesic technique in this surgical population.
Title: Comparison Between Erector Spine Plane Block Versus Subcostal Transverse Abdominal Plane Block for Post-Operative Analgesic in Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in CMH Muzaffarabad AJK
Description:
Background: Adequate postoperative analgesia is crucial for enhancing patient ease and recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Erector spinae plane (ESP) block and subcostal transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block are two regional anesthesia procedures that have added consideration for their potential to offer effective analgesia.
However, a comparative analysis of these blocks in this surgical context was limited.
Aim: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the erector spinae plane block versus the subcostal transverse abdominal plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods: The research was led at CMH muzaffarbad ajk Hospital,from October 2023 to September 2024, involving 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at CMH Muzaffarabad, AJK.
Participants were erratically allotted to receive either ESP block or the TAP block.
Pain levels were evaluated by means of the visual analog scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.
The total analgesic consumption and the time to first analgesic request was also recorded.
Results: The results indicated that patients receiving erector spinae plane block described meaningfully lower pain scores at 1 hour (VAS 2.
1 ± 0.
8) and 6 hours (VAS 3.
5 ± 1.
2) postoperatively compared to those receiving TAP block (VAS 3.
5 ± 1.
0 at 1 hour; VAS 4.
5 ± 1.
3 at 6 hours).
Additionally, the time to first analgesic request was longer in the ESP group (10.
5 ± 2.
4 hours) associated to TAP set (6.
8 ± 1.
9 hours).
Total analgesic consumption was also significantly lower in the ESP group (30.
0 ± 5.
5 mg) versus the TAP group (45.
0 ± 8.
0 mg).
Conclusion: The erector spinae plane block provided superior postoperative analgesia compared to subcostal transverse abdominal plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Those findings support use of ESP block as an effective analgesic technique in this surgical population.
Related Results
Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Unilateral Subcostal Transverse Abdominal Plane Block Versus Conventional Systemic Analgesics for Postoperative Analgesia among Adult Patients Undergoing Open Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study
Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Unilateral Subcostal Transverse Abdominal Plane Block Versus Conventional Systemic Analgesics for Postoperative Analgesia among Adult Patients Undergoing Open Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study
Background: Postoperative pain after open cholecystectomy poses a significant challenge, with potential complications and
extended hospital stays. Postoperative pain control is tra...
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
Abstract
Background/purpose
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed general surgical procedures. Difficult laparoscopi...
Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy under General Anaesthesia – A Randomised Control Study
Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy under General Anaesthesia – A Randomised Control Study
Background: The Ultrasound guided Erector spinae plane block is a novel paraspinal plane block, first described in 2016 for thoracic analgesia at T5 level. Currently there are only...
Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound‐guided bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. rectus sheath block for midline abdominal surgery in a low‐ and middle‐income country: a randomised controlled trial
Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound‐guided bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. rectus sheath block for midline abdominal surgery in a low‐ and middle‐income country: a randomised controlled trial
Summary
Introduction
The use of erector spinae plane block and rectus sheath block for postoperative analgesia in midline...
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
Objectives: Toevaluate the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared with open cholecystectomy in compensated cirrhotic patients. Study Design: Prospective randomized stu...
MHC-based fitness and reproductive strategies in a genetically monogamous species : the black-legged kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla)
MHC-based fitness and reproductive strategies in a genetically monogamous species : the black-legged kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla)
Fitness et stratégies de reproduction en fonction du CMH chez une espèce génétiquement monogame : la mouette tridactyle (Rissa tridactyla)
La sélection sexuelle est...
COMPARING THE POST-OPERATIVE ANALGESIA USING ROPIVACAINE IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY BY THREE DIFFERENT METHODS-A COMPARATIVE STUDY
COMPARING THE POST-OPERATIVE ANALGESIA USING ROPIVACAINE IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY BY THREE DIFFERENT METHODS-A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a minimally invasive surgical procedure for cholecystectomy. In present time local anesthesia is
widely used as analgesic by various r...
Comparison of Single Clip Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SCLC) and Two Clip Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (TCLC): A Randomized Control Study
Comparison of Single Clip Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SCLC) and Two Clip Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (TCLC): A Randomized Control Study
Background: Advanced energy sources, such as the harmonic scalpel, though expensive, may provide the advantage of shorter operating time by reducing smoke, bloodless dissection in ...

