Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Pull-out strength of cemented solidversusfenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae

View through CrossRef
ObjectivesCement augmentation of pedicle screws could be used to improve screw stability, especially in osteoporotic vertebrae. However, little is known concerning the influence of different screw types and amount of cement applied. Therefore, the aim of this biomechanical in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on the screw pull-out force in osteoporotic vertebrae, comparing different pedicle screws (solid and fenestrated) and cement volumes (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).Materials and MethodsA total of 54 osteoporotic human cadaver thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws (uncemented, solid cemented or fenestrated cemented) and augmented with high-viscosity PMMA cement (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL). The insertion torque and bone mineral density were determined. Radiographs and CT scans were undertaken to evaluate cement distribution and cement leakage. Pull-out testing was performed with a material testing machine to measure failure load and stiffness. The paired t-test was used to compare the two screws within each vertebra.ResultsMean failure load was significantly greater for fenestrated cemented screws (+622 N; p ⩽ 0.001) and solid cemented screws (+460 N; p ⩽ 0.001) than for uncemented screws. There was no significant difference between the solid and fenestrated cemented screws (p = 0.5). In the lower thoracic vertebrae, 1 mL cement was enough to significantly increase failure load, while 3 mL led to further significant improvement in the upper thoracic, lower thoracic and lumbar regions.ConclusionConventional, solid pedicle screws augmented with high-viscosity cement provided comparable screw stability in pull-out testing to that of sophisticated and more expensive fenestrated screws. In terms of cement volume, we recommend the use of at least 1 mL in the thoracic and 3 mL in the lumbar spine. Cite this article: C. I. Leichtle, A. Lorenz, S. Rothstock, J. Happel, F. Walter, T. Shiozawa, U. G. Leichtle. Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:419–426.
Title: Pull-out strength of cemented solidversusfenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae
Description:
ObjectivesCement augmentation of pedicle screws could be used to improve screw stability, especially in osteoporotic vertebrae.
However, little is known concerning the influence of different screw types and amount of cement applied.
Therefore, the aim of this biomechanical in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on the screw pull-out force in osteoporotic vertebrae, comparing different pedicle screws (solid and fenestrated) and cement volumes (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).
Materials and MethodsA total of 54 osteoporotic human cadaver thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws (uncemented, solid cemented or fenestrated cemented) and augmented with high-viscosity PMMA cement (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).
The insertion torque and bone mineral density were determined.
Radiographs and CT scans were undertaken to evaluate cement distribution and cement leakage.
Pull-out testing was performed with a material testing machine to measure failure load and stiffness.
The paired t-test was used to compare the two screws within each vertebra.
ResultsMean failure load was significantly greater for fenestrated cemented screws (+622 N; p ⩽ 0.
001) and solid cemented screws (+460 N; p ⩽ 0.
001) than for uncemented screws.
There was no significant difference between the solid and fenestrated cemented screws (p = 0.
5).
In the lower thoracic vertebrae, 1 mL cement was enough to significantly increase failure load, while 3 mL led to further significant improvement in the upper thoracic, lower thoracic and lumbar regions.
ConclusionConventional, solid pedicle screws augmented with high-viscosity cement provided comparable screw stability in pull-out testing to that of sophisticated and more expensive fenestrated screws.
In terms of cement volume, we recommend the use of at least 1 mL in the thoracic and 3 mL in the lumbar spine.
Cite this article: C.
I.
Leichtle, A.
Lorenz, S.
Rothstock, J.
Happel, F.
Walter, T.
Shiozawa, U.
G.
Leichtle.
Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Bone Joint Res 2016;5:419–426.

Related Results

Stiffness Comparisons of SOP Interlocking Plate Configurations in 3D Printed Canine Lumbosacral Vertebrae
Stiffness Comparisons of SOP Interlocking Plate Configurations in 3D Printed Canine Lumbosacral Vertebrae
There are no published biomechanical studies evaluating the effect of stabilization techniques on the stability of the 3D printed models of the canine lumbosacral junction. The p...
Effect of Pedicle Fill on Axial Pullout Strength in Spinal Fixation After Rod Reduction
Effect of Pedicle Fill on Axial Pullout Strength in Spinal Fixation After Rod Reduction
Rod reduction to pedicle screws is used for a variety of spinal fixation procedures; however, it can alter the integrity of the screw-bone interface. The authors investigated the e...
Osseointegration Potential of Boron-Coated Titanium Alloy Pedicle Screw in Rabbit Spine Model
Osseointegration Potential of Boron-Coated Titanium Alloy Pedicle Screw in Rabbit Spine Model
Abstract Study Design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial Objective To enhance stem cell conversion and osseointegration using boron-coated screws and leveraging bo...
Frequency of Misplacement of Percutaneously Placed Pedicle Screws in Thoracolumbar Fractures
Frequency of Misplacement of Percutaneously Placed Pedicle Screws in Thoracolumbar Fractures
of thoracolumbar fractures. Material and Methods:  A descriptive case series was conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore. The study ...
The Place of 3D Printing Preoperative Planning in Upper Thoracic Fractures
The Place of 3D Printing Preoperative Planning in Upper Thoracic Fractures
Abstract Background: This study aims to compare the clinical results of patients with upper thoracic vertebral fractures treated with pedicle screw and posterior spinal fus...

Back to Top