Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Pull-out strength of cemented solidversusfenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae

View through CrossRef
ObjectivesCement augmentation of pedicle screws could be used to improve screw stability, especially in osteoporotic vertebrae. However, little is known concerning the influence of different screw types and amount of cement applied. Therefore, the aim of this biomechanical in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on the screw pull-out force in osteoporotic vertebrae, comparing different pedicle screws (solid and fenestrated) and cement volumes (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).Materials and MethodsA total of 54 osteoporotic human cadaver thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws (uncemented, solid cemented or fenestrated cemented) and augmented with high-viscosity PMMA cement (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL). The insertion torque and bone mineral density were determined. Radiographs and CT scans were undertaken to evaluate cement distribution and cement leakage. Pull-out testing was performed with a material testing machine to measure failure load and stiffness. The paired t-test was used to compare the two screws within each vertebra.ResultsMean failure load was significantly greater for fenestrated cemented screws (+622 N; p ⩽ 0.001) and solid cemented screws (+460 N; p ⩽ 0.001) than for uncemented screws. There was no significant difference between the solid and fenestrated cemented screws (p = 0.5). In the lower thoracic vertebrae, 1 mL cement was enough to significantly increase failure load, while 3 mL led to further significant improvement in the upper thoracic, lower thoracic and lumbar regions.ConclusionConventional, solid pedicle screws augmented with high-viscosity cement provided comparable screw stability in pull-out testing to that of sophisticated and more expensive fenestrated screws. In terms of cement volume, we recommend the use of at least 1 mL in the thoracic and 3 mL in the lumbar spine. Cite this article: C. I. Leichtle, A. Lorenz, S. Rothstock, J. Happel, F. Walter, T. Shiozawa, U. G. Leichtle. Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:419–426.
Title: Pull-out strength of cemented solidversusfenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae
Description:
ObjectivesCement augmentation of pedicle screws could be used to improve screw stability, especially in osteoporotic vertebrae.
However, little is known concerning the influence of different screw types and amount of cement applied.
Therefore, the aim of this biomechanical in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on the screw pull-out force in osteoporotic vertebrae, comparing different pedicle screws (solid and fenestrated) and cement volumes (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).
Materials and MethodsA total of 54 osteoporotic human cadaver thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws (uncemented, solid cemented or fenestrated cemented) and augmented with high-viscosity PMMA cement (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).
The insertion torque and bone mineral density were determined.
Radiographs and CT scans were undertaken to evaluate cement distribution and cement leakage.
Pull-out testing was performed with a material testing machine to measure failure load and stiffness.
The paired t-test was used to compare the two screws within each vertebra.
ResultsMean failure load was significantly greater for fenestrated cemented screws (+622 N; p ⩽ 0.
001) and solid cemented screws (+460 N; p ⩽ 0.
001) than for uncemented screws.
There was no significant difference between the solid and fenestrated cemented screws (p = 0.
5).
In the lower thoracic vertebrae, 1 mL cement was enough to significantly increase failure load, while 3 mL led to further significant improvement in the upper thoracic, lower thoracic and lumbar regions.
ConclusionConventional, solid pedicle screws augmented with high-viscosity cement provided comparable screw stability in pull-out testing to that of sophisticated and more expensive fenestrated screws.
In terms of cement volume, we recommend the use of at least 1 mL in the thoracic and 3 mL in the lumbar spine.
Cite this article: C.
I.
Leichtle, A.
Lorenz, S.
Rothstock, J.
Happel, F.
Walter, T.
Shiozawa, U.
G.
Leichtle.
Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Bone Joint Res 2016;5:419–426.

Related Results

Stiffness Comparisons of SOP Interlocking Plate Configurations in 3D Printed Canine Lumbosacral Vertebrae
Stiffness Comparisons of SOP Interlocking Plate Configurations in 3D Printed Canine Lumbosacral Vertebrae
There are no published biomechanical studies evaluating the effect of stabilization techniques on the stability of the 3D printed models of the canine lumbosacral junction. The p...
Osseointegration Potential of Boron-Coated Titanium Alloy Pedicle Screw in Rabbit Spine Model
Osseointegration Potential of Boron-Coated Titanium Alloy Pedicle Screw in Rabbit Spine Model
Abstract Study Design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial Objective To enhance stem cell conversion and osseointegration using boron-coated screws and leveraging bo...
Influence of Different Fixed System in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae in Fusion:A 3D Finite Element Analysis
Influence of Different Fixed System in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae in Fusion:A 3D Finite Element Analysis
Abstract Background:Posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) is the most common surgical method for lumbar fusion surgery, and pedicle screws(PS)can provide effective fixati...
The Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Printed Expandable Pedicle Screw Sleeve Insert
The Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Printed Expandable Pedicle Screw Sleeve Insert
When used in combination with decompression, spinal fusion is a successful procedure for treating patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. While a number o...
Mechanical and biological behaviour of additive manufactured biomimetic biodegradable orthopaedic cortical screws
Mechanical and biological behaviour of additive manufactured biomimetic biodegradable orthopaedic cortical screws
Purpose The complications caused by metallic orthopaedic bone screws like stress-shielding effect, screw loosening, screw migration, higher density difference, painful reoperation ...
FREE-HAND PLACEMENT OF C7 PEDICLE SCREWS: A CADAVERIC STUDY
FREE-HAND PLACEMENT OF C7 PEDICLE SCREWS: A CADAVERIC STUDY
Objective : To evaluate the accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws placement at the seventh cervical vertebra. Methods : The authors have exposed the cervicothoracic junction of 9 a...

Back to Top