Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Pull-out strength of cemented solidversusfenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae
View through CrossRef
ObjectivesCement augmentation of pedicle screws could be used to improve screw stability, especially in osteoporotic vertebrae. However, little is known concerning the influence of different screw types and amount of cement applied. Therefore, the aim of this biomechanical in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on the screw pull-out force in osteoporotic vertebrae, comparing different pedicle screws (solid and fenestrated) and cement volumes (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).Materials and MethodsA total of 54 osteoporotic human cadaver thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws (uncemented, solid cemented or fenestrated cemented) and augmented with high-viscosity PMMA cement (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL). The insertion torque and bone mineral density were determined. Radiographs and CT scans were undertaken to evaluate cement distribution and cement leakage. Pull-out testing was performed with a material testing machine to measure failure load and stiffness. The paired t-test was used to compare the two screws within each vertebra.ResultsMean failure load was significantly greater for fenestrated cemented screws (+622 N; p ⩽ 0.001) and solid cemented screws (+460 N; p ⩽ 0.001) than for uncemented screws. There was no significant difference between the solid and fenestrated cemented screws (p = 0.5). In the lower thoracic vertebrae, 1 mL cement was enough to significantly increase failure load, while 3 mL led to further significant improvement in the upper thoracic, lower thoracic and lumbar regions.ConclusionConventional, solid pedicle screws augmented with high-viscosity cement provided comparable screw stability in pull-out testing to that of sophisticated and more expensive fenestrated screws. In terms of cement volume, we recommend the use of at least 1 mL in the thoracic and 3 mL in the lumbar spine. Cite this article: C. I. Leichtle, A. Lorenz, S. Rothstock, J. Happel, F. Walter, T. Shiozawa, U. G. Leichtle. Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:419–426.
British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
Title: Pull-out strength of cemented solidversusfenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae
Description:
ObjectivesCement augmentation of pedicle screws could be used to improve screw stability, especially in osteoporotic vertebrae.
However, little is known concerning the influence of different screw types and amount of cement applied.
Therefore, the aim of this biomechanical in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on the screw pull-out force in osteoporotic vertebrae, comparing different pedicle screws (solid and fenestrated) and cement volumes (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).
Materials and MethodsA total of 54 osteoporotic human cadaver thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws (uncemented, solid cemented or fenestrated cemented) and augmented with high-viscosity PMMA cement (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).
The insertion torque and bone mineral density were determined.
Radiographs and CT scans were undertaken to evaluate cement distribution and cement leakage.
Pull-out testing was performed with a material testing machine to measure failure load and stiffness.
The paired t-test was used to compare the two screws within each vertebra.
ResultsMean failure load was significantly greater for fenestrated cemented screws (+622 N; p ⩽ 0.
001) and solid cemented screws (+460 N; p ⩽ 0.
001) than for uncemented screws.
There was no significant difference between the solid and fenestrated cemented screws (p = 0.
5).
In the lower thoracic vertebrae, 1 mL cement was enough to significantly increase failure load, while 3 mL led to further significant improvement in the upper thoracic, lower thoracic and lumbar regions.
ConclusionConventional, solid pedicle screws augmented with high-viscosity cement provided comparable screw stability in pull-out testing to that of sophisticated and more expensive fenestrated screws.
In terms of cement volume, we recommend the use of at least 1 mL in the thoracic and 3 mL in the lumbar spine.
Cite this article: C.
I.
Leichtle, A.
Lorenz, S.
Rothstock, J.
Happel, F.
Walter, T.
Shiozawa, U.
G.
Leichtle.
Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Bone Joint Res 2016;5:419–426.
Related Results
Stiffness Comparisons of SOP Interlocking Plate Configurations in 3D Printed Canine Lumbosacral Vertebrae
Stiffness Comparisons of SOP Interlocking Plate Configurations in 3D Printed Canine Lumbosacral Vertebrae
There are no published biomechanical studies evaluating the effect of stabilization techniques on the stability of the 3D printed models of the canine lumbosacral junction. The p...
Influence of Different Fixed System in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae in Fusion:A 3D Finite Element Analysis
Influence of Different Fixed System in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae in Fusion:A 3D Finite Element Analysis
Abstract
Background:Posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) is the most common surgical method for lumbar fusion surgery, and pedicle screws(PS)can provide effective fixati...
Variables Associated With Loss of Fixation of Retrograde Rami Screws in Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injuries
Variables Associated With Loss of Fixation of Retrograde Rami Screws in Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injuries
OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate variables associated with loss of fixation of retrograde rami screws in the treatment of stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression...
The Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Printed Expandable Pedicle Screw Sleeve Insert
The Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Printed Expandable Pedicle Screw Sleeve Insert
When used in combination with decompression, spinal fusion is a successful procedure for treating patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. While a number o...
Reoperation for Misplaced Pedicle Screws: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Reoperation for Misplaced Pedicle Screws: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Study Design.
A multicenter retrospective analysis.
Objective.
This study aims to investigate reoperation of misplaced ped...
Pullout strength of monocortical and bicortical screws in meta -physeal and diaphyseal regions of the canine humerus
Pullout strength of monocortical and bicortical screws in meta -physeal and diaphyseal regions of the canine humerus
Summary
Objective: Monocortical screws are commonly employed in locking plate fixation, but specific recommendations for their placement are lacking and use of short mono...
Smart Device Based Application for Rod Determination in Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery
Smart Device Based Application for Rod Determination in Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery
In orthopaedic spine surgery pedicle screw systems are used for stabilisation of the spine after injuries or disorders. With an percutaneous operation method surgeons are faced wit...
Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Evaluation of 170,413 operations
Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Evaluation of 170,413 operations
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Since the introduction of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Sweden, both components have most commonly been cemented. A decade ago the frequency of uncemented...

