Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Social rights, solidarism, and the market society: Afterword to the Foreword by Nehal Bhuta
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This Afterword builds on Nehal Bhuta’s Foreword by revisiting the intellectual and historical underpinnings of social rights, particularly their emergence in the nineteenth century through solidarist political philosophy. It argues that solidarism, unlike both liberal individualism and Marxist collectivism, envisioned the political community as grounded in spontaneous social bonds of mutual responsibility rather than in contracts or class struggle. The Afterword further explores how social rights were historically entangled with capitalism, noting that while originally conceived to counterbalance market forces, their efficacy is now weakened by the neoliberal transformation of civil and political rights. Contemporary market dynamics—exemplified by gig economy practices—threaten to erode the emancipatory potential of social rights. Unless social rights are reconnected to democratic principles and the material conditions of political participation, they risk losing relevance in the face of growing inequality.
Title: Social rights, solidarism, and the market society: Afterword to the Foreword by Nehal Bhuta
Description:
Abstract
This Afterword builds on Nehal Bhuta’s Foreword by revisiting the intellectual and historical underpinnings of social rights, particularly their emergence in the nineteenth century through solidarist political philosophy.
It argues that solidarism, unlike both liberal individualism and Marxist collectivism, envisioned the political community as grounded in spontaneous social bonds of mutual responsibility rather than in contracts or class struggle.
The Afterword further explores how social rights were historically entangled with capitalism, noting that while originally conceived to counterbalance market forces, their efficacy is now weakened by the neoliberal transformation of civil and political rights.
Contemporary market dynamics—exemplified by gig economy practices—threaten to erode the emancipatory potential of social rights.
Unless social rights are reconnected to democratic principles and the material conditions of political participation, they risk losing relevance in the face of growing inequality.
Related Results
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
MAKNA BHŪTA KALA PADA DESAIN KEMASAN KOPI “LEAK BALI” DI BALI
MAKNA BHŪTA KALA PADA DESAIN KEMASAN KOPI “LEAK BALI” DI BALI
Secara etimologi, kata Bhūta Kala terdiri dari dua kata yaitu Bhūta yang bermakna sesuatu yang ada dan kala yang bermakna kekuatan atau energi. Kata Bhūta juga dapat diartikan seba...
Costly ambiguities: Afterword to the Foreword by Nehal Bhuta
Costly ambiguities: Afterword to the Foreword by Nehal Bhuta
Abstract
Even as social rights now appear in the majority of the world’s constitutions, most of the core human rights treaties, and many legislative bills of righ...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Le spectacle des bhūta. Observations sur les rapports du théâtre et du rituel
Le spectacle des bhūta. Observations sur les rapports du théâtre et du rituel
Le culte des bhūta, « démons », réfléchit la société matrilinéaire TuỊu, jadis organisée en chefferies. De nos jours, les descendants des anciens seigneurs sont encore les donateur...
Bhuta Yajna Dalam Teks Aji Swamandala
Bhuta Yajna Dalam Teks Aji Swamandala
Bhuta Yajna adalah bagian dari lima upacara Yajna yang umum dilaksanakan di Bali, melalui Bhuta Yajna manusia menujaga keseimbangan alam yang merupakan implementasi dari ajaran Tri...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
531Human rights — Rights of women in Northern Ireland — Pregnant women and girls — Autonomy and bodily integrity — Right to respect for private and family life — Rights of persons ...

