Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Impact and Correction of an Anterior Phakic Intraocular Lens on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry

View through CrossRef
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometric measurements and IOL power calculation. Methods: This retrospective analysis of 67 eyes of 49 patients with previous anterior chamber pIOL implantation analyzed the accuracy of automatic segmentation of the anterior surface of the crystalline lens and its impact on anterior chamber depth (ACD, measured from epithelium to lens), lens thickness measurements, and IOL power calculation. The sample was divided into two groups: correct detection of the anterior surface of the crystalline lens and inaccurate detection. Segmentation of eyes from the inaccurate detection group was manually corrected and ACD and lens thickness were calculated using ImageJ software. IOL power was calculated using 7 formulas for both measurements. Results: The anterior surface of the crystalline lens was mis-identified in 13 (19.4%) eyes. ACD was underestimated (Δ −0.85 ± 0.33 mm, P < .001) and lens thickness was overestimated (Δ +0.81 ± 0.25 mm, P < .001). Manual correction changed the target spherical equivalent only in the Haigis formula ( P = .009). After correction for segmentation bias, the Pearl DGS, Cooke K6, and EVO 2.0 formulas showed the lowest prediction error, with the Pearl DGS showing greatest accuracy within ±1.00 diopters of prediction error range (81.0%). Conclusions: SS-OCT biometry misidentifies the anterior surface of the crystalline lens in a significant proportion, resulting in significant IOL power calculation error in the Haigis formula. Manual proofing of segmentation is mandatory in every patient with anterior chamber pIOL implantation. After correct segmentation, the Pearl DGS, Cooke K6, and EVO seem to be the best formulas. [ J Refract Surg . 2024;40(8):e562–e568.]
Title: Impact and Correction of an Anterior Phakic Intraocular Lens on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry
Description:
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometric measurements and IOL power calculation.
Methods: This retrospective analysis of 67 eyes of 49 patients with previous anterior chamber pIOL implantation analyzed the accuracy of automatic segmentation of the anterior surface of the crystalline lens and its impact on anterior chamber depth (ACD, measured from epithelium to lens), lens thickness measurements, and IOL power calculation.
The sample was divided into two groups: correct detection of the anterior surface of the crystalline lens and inaccurate detection.
Segmentation of eyes from the inaccurate detection group was manually corrected and ACD and lens thickness were calculated using ImageJ software.
IOL power was calculated using 7 formulas for both measurements.
Results: The anterior surface of the crystalline lens was mis-identified in 13 (19.
4%) eyes.
ACD was underestimated (Δ −0.
85 ± 0.
33 mm, P < .
001) and lens thickness was overestimated (Δ +0.
81 ± 0.
25 mm, P < .
001).
Manual correction changed the target spherical equivalent only in the Haigis formula ( P = .
009).
After correction for segmentation bias, the Pearl DGS, Cooke K6, and EVO 2.
0 formulas showed the lowest prediction error, with the Pearl DGS showing greatest accuracy within ±1.
00 diopters of prediction error range (81.
0%).
Conclusions: SS-OCT biometry misidentifies the anterior surface of the crystalline lens in a significant proportion, resulting in significant IOL power calculation error in the Haigis formula.
Manual proofing of segmentation is mandatory in every patient with anterior chamber pIOL implantation.
After correct segmentation, the Pearl DGS, Cooke K6, and EVO seem to be the best formulas.
[ J Refract Surg .
2024;40(8):e562–e568.
].

Related Results

Calculation of ocular magnification in phakic and pseudophakic eyes based on anterior segment OCT data
Calculation of ocular magnification in phakic and pseudophakic eyes based on anterior segment OCT data
AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study is to develop a straightforward mathematical concept for determination of object to image magnification in both phakic and pseudophakic eye...
STARDUST SIGN AND RETINAL TEAR DETECTION ON SWEPT SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY
STARDUST SIGN AND RETINAL TEAR DETECTION ON SWEPT SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY
Purpose: The causes of floaters include posterior vitreous detachment and fundus hemorrhage, both of which are risk factors for retinal tears. We observed the vitreous ...
Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Using Optical and Ultrasound Biometry in Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery
Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Using Optical and Ultrasound Biometry in Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery
Background: Accurate biometry is critical for optimal visual outcomes in cataract surgery. Both optical and ultrasound biometry are widely used, but their comparative effectiveness...
Comparison of IOL Power Calculated by Preoperative Biometry versus Intraoperative Wavefront Aberrometry in Thai Cataract Patients.
Comparison of IOL Power Calculated by Preoperative Biometry versus Intraoperative Wavefront Aberrometry in Thai Cataract Patients.
Abstract Background: To find agreement between the calculated intraocular lens (IOL) power from using the SRK/T based preoperative biometry and the intraoperative wavefront...
Comparison of IOL Power Calculated by Preoperative Biometry versus Intraoperative Wavefront Aberrometry in Thai Cataract Patients.
Comparison of IOL Power Calculated by Preoperative Biometry versus Intraoperative Wavefront Aberrometry in Thai Cataract Patients.
Abstract Background: As people now are expecting more precise and predictable results from cataract surgery. We need to find agreement between the calculated intraocular le...
Comparison of IOL Power Calculated by Preoperative Biometry versus Intraoperative Wavefront Aberrometry in Thai Cataract Patients.
Comparison of IOL Power Calculated by Preoperative Biometry versus Intraoperative Wavefront Aberrometry in Thai Cataract Patients.
Abstract Background : To find agreement between the calculated intraocular lens (IOL) power from using the SRK/T based preoperative biometry and the intraoperative wavefron...

Back to Top