Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Neural Underpinnings of Morality Judgment and Moral Aesthetic Judgment

View through CrossRef
Abstract Morality judgment usually refers to the evaluation of moral behavior`s ability to affect others` interests and welfare, while moral aesthetic judgment often implies the appraisal of moral behavior's capability to provide aesthetic pleasure. Both are based on the behavioral understanding. To our knowledge, no study has directly compared the brain activity of these two types of judgments. The present study recorded and analyzed brain activity involved in the morality and moral aesthetic judgments to reveal whether these two types of judgments differ in their neural underpinnings. Results reveled that morality judgment activated the frontal, parietal and occipital cortex previously reported for motor representations of behavior. Evaluation of goodness and badness showed similar patterns of activation in these brain regions. In contrast, moral aesthetic judgment elicited specific activations in the frontal, parietal and temporal cortex proved to be involved in the behavioral intentions and emotions. Evaluation of beauty and ugliness showed similar patterns of activation in these brain regions. Our findings indicate that morality judgment and moral aesthetic judgment recruit different cortical networks that might decode others' behaviors at different levels. These results contribute to further understanding of the essence of the relationship between morality judgment and aesthetic judgment.
Title: Neural Underpinnings of Morality Judgment and Moral Aesthetic Judgment
Description:
Abstract Morality judgment usually refers to the evaluation of moral behavior`s ability to affect others` interests and welfare, while moral aesthetic judgment often implies the appraisal of moral behavior's capability to provide aesthetic pleasure.
Both are based on the behavioral understanding.
To our knowledge, no study has directly compared the brain activity of these two types of judgments.
The present study recorded and analyzed brain activity involved in the morality and moral aesthetic judgments to reveal whether these two types of judgments differ in their neural underpinnings.
Results reveled that morality judgment activated the frontal, parietal and occipital cortex previously reported for motor representations of behavior.
Evaluation of goodness and badness showed similar patterns of activation in these brain regions.
In contrast, moral aesthetic judgment elicited specific activations in the frontal, parietal and temporal cortex proved to be involved in the behavioral intentions and emotions.
Evaluation of beauty and ugliness showed similar patterns of activation in these brain regions.
Our findings indicate that morality judgment and moral aesthetic judgment recruit different cortical networks that might decode others' behaviors at different levels.
These results contribute to further understanding of the essence of the relationship between morality judgment and aesthetic judgment.

Related Results

Escaping the Shadow
Escaping the Shadow
Photo by Karl Raymund Catabas on Unsplash The interests of patients at most levels of policymaking are represented by a disconnected patchwork of groups … “After Buddha was dead, ...
Moral Epistemology
Moral Epistemology
Moral epistemology is the study of moral knowledge and related phenomena. The recorded history of work in the field extends (at least) 2,500 years to Socrates’s inquiries into whet...
A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
Morality and ethics
Morality and ethics
Morality is a distinct sphere within the domain of normative thinking about action and feeling (see Normativity); the whole domain, however, is the subject of ethics. How ...
Ordinary ethical navigation. An account of moral understanding
Ordinary ethical navigation. An account of moral understanding
This dissertation defends an account of moral understanding as the competence to navigate ethical life. The nature of moral understanding is an object of controversy. Some claim th...
Aesthetic attitude
Aesthetic attitude
It is undeniable that there are aesthetic and non-aesthetic attitudes. But is there such a thing as the aesthetic attitude? What is meant by the aesthetic attitude is the particula...
Extending Post-Interpretive Criticism: Additional Diagnostic Indices for Enhanced Phenomenological Fidelity in Art Criticism
Extending Post-Interpretive Criticism: Additional Diagnostic Indices for Enhanced Phenomenological Fidelity in Art Criticism
This paper extends Post-Interpretive Criticism (PIC) by introducing a second layer of diagnostic indices designed to evaluate the phenomenological fidelity of art criticism. While ...
Hadith Study of Morals: Praiseworthy and Disgraceful Behavior
Hadith Study of Morals: Praiseworthy and Disgraceful Behavior
The word morality comes from the Arabic word khalaqu-yahluqu which etymologically means character, disposition, arrangement, behavior or nature. Morality is divided into two parts,...

Back to Top