Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Implant‐supported mandibular overdentures: a cross‐sectional study

View through CrossRef
AbstractObjective: The aim of this cross‐sectional study was to determine the clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in subjects treated with mandibular overdentures supported by two implants.Material and methods: One hundred and fifty‐nine patients, who received restorative therapy in the edentulous mandible consisting of a bar‐retained overdenture supported by two osseointegrated implants in a private clinic in Italy, were recalled for a clinical and radiographic examination. One hundred and forty‐one subjects with 280 implants attended the examination. The average follow‐up time was 3.9 years. The radiographic examination included assessments of the distance between the implant margin and the most coronal position of bone‐to‐implant contact at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant. A questionnaire regarding comfort, satisfaction with the treatment, aesthetics, speaking capacity and efficiency in chewing was obtained from each subject. Biological and technical complications were recorded and the number of visits due to complications between the delivery of the prostheses and the re‐examination was determined.Results: The results from the examination revealed that the number of lost implants was small and the average marginal bone level around the implants was 0.67 mm apical of the implant margin. The most frequently observed complication was hyperplasia of the mucosal tissue under the bar construction. Few patients experienced loosening of retention. The vast majority of patients reported to be satisfied in relation to the restorative therapy from both functional and aesthetic points of view.Conclusion: Patients with edentulous mandibles may be successfully rehabilitated by means of two implants supporting a bar‐retained overdenture.To cite this article:
Bressan E, Tomasi C, Stellini E, Sivolella S, Favero G, Berglundh T. Implant‐supported mandibular overdentures: a cross‐sectional study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 814–819.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02225.x
Title: Implant‐supported mandibular overdentures: a cross‐sectional study
Description:
AbstractObjective: The aim of this cross‐sectional study was to determine the clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in subjects treated with mandibular overdentures supported by two implants.
Material and methods: One hundred and fifty‐nine patients, who received restorative therapy in the edentulous mandible consisting of a bar‐retained overdenture supported by two osseointegrated implants in a private clinic in Italy, were recalled for a clinical and radiographic examination.
One hundred and forty‐one subjects with 280 implants attended the examination.
The average follow‐up time was 3.
9 years.
The radiographic examination included assessments of the distance between the implant margin and the most coronal position of bone‐to‐implant contact at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant.
A questionnaire regarding comfort, satisfaction with the treatment, aesthetics, speaking capacity and efficiency in chewing was obtained from each subject.
Biological and technical complications were recorded and the number of visits due to complications between the delivery of the prostheses and the re‐examination was determined.
Results: The results from the examination revealed that the number of lost implants was small and the average marginal bone level around the implants was 0.
67 mm apical of the implant margin.
The most frequently observed complication was hyperplasia of the mucosal tissue under the bar construction.
Few patients experienced loosening of retention.
The vast majority of patients reported to be satisfied in relation to the restorative therapy from both functional and aesthetic points of view.
Conclusion: Patients with edentulous mandibles may be successfully rehabilitated by means of two implants supporting a bar‐retained overdenture.
To cite this article:
Bressan E, Tomasi C, Stellini E, Sivolella S, Favero G, Berglundh T.
Implant‐supported mandibular overdentures: a cross‐sectional study.

Clin.
Oral Impl.
Res.
23, 2012; 814–819.

doi: 10.
1111/j.
1600‐0501.
2011.
02225.
x.

Related Results

Studies on maxillary overdentures: implant- and prosthesis survival, cost analysis and patient-reported outcomes
Studies on maxillary overdentures: implant- and prosthesis survival, cost analysis and patient-reported outcomes
Edentulism is a debilitating condition which may negatively affect quality of life, particularly in relation to nutritional and social health, speech, and poor facial appearance. P...
Swallowing dynamics of two implants versus single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: randomized clinical trial
Swallowing dynamics of two implants versus single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: randomized clinical trial
Objective This study evaluated the swallowing dynamics of two-implant (2-IOD) versus singleimplant (1-IOD) mandibular overdentures using the Test of Mastication and Swallowing Soli...
Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
AbstractBackgroundDental implant‐retained overdentures have been chosen as the treatment of choice for complete mandibular removable dentures. Dental implants, such as mini dental ...
Observation of the effect on immediate mandibular implant-supported overdenture of micro implant system of Italy
Observation of the effect on immediate mandibular implant-supported overdenture of micro implant system of Italy
The study was design to investigate the clinical effect of Micro implant system in Italy on immediate mandibular implant-supported overdenture. A total of 192 patients with mandibu...
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Abstract Background Long-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone d...
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...
Assessment of Candida Species Colonization and Denture-Related Stomatitis in Bar- and Locator-Retained Overdentures
Assessment of Candida Species Colonization and Denture-Related Stomatitis in Bar- and Locator-Retained Overdentures
The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of denture-related stomatitis (DRS) in different attachment-retained overdenture wearers and its association with particular colo...
The influence of mandibular implant‐retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency
The influence of mandibular implant‐retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency
doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2011.00539.xThe influence of mandibular implant‐retained overdentures in masticatory efficiencyObjective:  To evaluate the masticatory efficiency of patien...

Back to Top