Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Buzz-world: Global patterns and drivers of buzzing bees and poricidal plants
View through CrossRef
SUMMARY
Foraging behavior frequently plays a major role in driving the geographic distribution of animals. Buzzing to extract protein-rich pollen from flowers is a key foraging behavior used by bee species across at least 83 genera (these genera comprise ∼58% of all bee species). Although buzzing is widely recognized to affect the ecology and evolution of bees and flowering plants (e.g., buzz-pollinated flowers), global patterns and drivers of buzzing bee biogeography remain unexplored. Here, we investigate the global species distribution patterns within each bee family and how patterns and drivers differ with respect to buzzing bee species. We found that both distributional patterns and drivers of richness typically differed for buzzing species compared to hotspots for all bee species and when grouped by family. A major predictor of the distribution, but not species richness overall for buzzing members of four of the five major bee families included in analyses (Andrenidae, Halictidae, Colletidae and to a lesser extent, Apidae) was the richness of poricidal flowering plant species, which depend on buzzing bees for pollination. As poricidal plant richness was highest in areas with low wind and high aridity, we discuss how global hotspots of buzzing bee biodiversity are likely driven by both biogeographic factors and plant host availability. Whilst we explored global patterns with State-level data, higher resolution work is needed to explore local level drivers of patterns, but from a global perspective, buzz-pollinated plants clearly play a greater role in the ecology and evolution of buzzing bees than previously predicted.
Title: Buzz-world: Global patterns and drivers of buzzing bees and poricidal plants
Description:
SUMMARY
Foraging behavior frequently plays a major role in driving the geographic distribution of animals.
Buzzing to extract protein-rich pollen from flowers is a key foraging behavior used by bee species across at least 83 genera (these genera comprise ∼58% of all bee species).
Although buzzing is widely recognized to affect the ecology and evolution of bees and flowering plants (e.
g.
, buzz-pollinated flowers), global patterns and drivers of buzzing bee biogeography remain unexplored.
Here, we investigate the global species distribution patterns within each bee family and how patterns and drivers differ with respect to buzzing bee species.
We found that both distributional patterns and drivers of richness typically differed for buzzing species compared to hotspots for all bee species and when grouped by family.
A major predictor of the distribution, but not species richness overall for buzzing members of four of the five major bee families included in analyses (Andrenidae, Halictidae, Colletidae and to a lesser extent, Apidae) was the richness of poricidal flowering plant species, which depend on buzzing bees for pollination.
As poricidal plant richness was highest in areas with low wind and high aridity, we discuss how global hotspots of buzzing bee biodiversity are likely driven by both biogeographic factors and plant host availability.
Whilst we explored global patterns with State-level data, higher resolution work is needed to explore local level drivers of patterns, but from a global perspective, buzz-pollinated plants clearly play a greater role in the ecology and evolution of buzzing bees than previously predicted.
Related Results
Widespread evolution of poricidal flowers: A striking example of morphological convergence across flowering plants
Widespread evolution of poricidal flowers: A striking example of morphological convergence across flowering plants
AbstractThe evolution of tube-like floral morphologies that control pollen release via small openings (functionally poricidal flowers) represents a taxonomically and geographically...
Red mason bees cannot compete with honey bees for floral resources in a cage experiment
Red mason bees cannot compete with honey bees for floral resources in a cage experiment
AbstractIntensive beekeeping to mitigate crop pollination deficits and habitat loss may cause interspecific competition between bees. Studies show negative correlations between flo...
Structural Dynamics of Real and Modeled Solanum Stamens: Implications for Pollen Ejection by Buzzing Bees
Structural Dynamics of Real and Modeled Solanum Stamens: Implications for Pollen Ejection by Buzzing Bees
AbstractAn estimated 10% of flowering plant species conceal their pollen within tube-like anthers that dehisce through small apical pores (poricidal anthers). Bees extract pollen f...
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
Introduction Road Traffic Injury (RTI) pose a significant health challenge. It represents the eighth leading cause of death globally, prompting the UN to designate 2011-2020 as...
Andromonoecy functional through heterostyly and large carpenter bees as principal pollinators in Solanum carolinense L. (Solanaceae)
Andromonoecy functional through heterostyly and large carpenter bees as principal pollinators in Solanum carolinense L. (Solanaceae)
Solanum carolinense is a perennial shrubby weed. In this species, andromonoecy is functional through heterostyly represented by the production of long, semi-long, medium, & sho...
Honey bees rob flowers after observing conspecifics and carpenter bees
Honey bees rob flowers after observing conspecifics and carpenter bees
Abstract
Individuals may add to their behavioural repertoire by observing conspecifics, and possibly heterospecifics. Here we test Darwin’s intriguing hypothesis that honey...
Does sex influence element accumulation in honey bees: workers vs drones
Does sex influence element accumulation in honey bees: workers vs drones
Abstract
Honey bees are social insects that have divided their work. Bees have two sexes, male and female. Female honey bees are queens and worker bees, while males...
Interactions for Pollination among Coflowering Shrubs
Interactions for Pollination among Coflowering Shrubs
To examine competition for pollination in a natural community, I measured pollinator sharing, pollinator dependence, and limitation of fruit set for four colflowering shrub species...

