Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Honey bees rob flowers after observing conspecifics and carpenter bees

View through CrossRef
Abstract Individuals may add to their behavioural repertoire by observing conspecifics, and possibly heterospecifics. Here we test Darwin’s intriguing hypothesis that honey bees rob nectar from flowers after observing the behaviour of other bees. We trained naïve honey bees to forage for sucrose by entering the flower-tube opening of custom designed 3D-printed model flowers before exposing individual bees to experimental flowers. In these flowers, nectar could only be accessed via a small hole at the base of the corolla tube, thereby simulating secondary nectar-robbing. Bees had to change their foraging behaviour from foraging via the mouth of the flower to foraging from the tube-base to rob. Different demonstrators were used to indicate the presence of a robbing hole. To explore the efficiency of information transfer from different demonstrators, we moved dead conspecific and heterospecific (carpenter bees and crickets) demonstrators towards this small hole to imitate nectar robbing. Differences in the ability and speed of honey bees to imitate robbing behaviour were recorded for each demonstrator treatment. Naïve honey bees switched to robbing behaviour more frequently when observing honey bee and carpenter bee demonstrators than when observing cricket demonstrators or controls that lacked a demonstrator. However, honey bees switched to robbing behaviour significantly faster after observing conspecifics than after observing any other demonstrators. This study demonstrates that honey bees can gather information from conspecifics and even heterospecifics while foraging, which can influence foraging behaviour such as flower robbing. Utilizing foraging cues from other individuals may lead to conspecific and heterospecific learning. “I can hardly doubt they [honeybees] were profiting by the workmanship and the example of the humble-bees: should this be verified, it will, I think, be a very instructive case of acquired knowledge in insects.” Darwin 1841
Title: Honey bees rob flowers after observing conspecifics and carpenter bees
Description:
Abstract Individuals may add to their behavioural repertoire by observing conspecifics, and possibly heterospecifics.
Here we test Darwin’s intriguing hypothesis that honey bees rob nectar from flowers after observing the behaviour of other bees.
We trained naïve honey bees to forage for sucrose by entering the flower-tube opening of custom designed 3D-printed model flowers before exposing individual bees to experimental flowers.
In these flowers, nectar could only be accessed via a small hole at the base of the corolla tube, thereby simulating secondary nectar-robbing.
Bees had to change their foraging behaviour from foraging via the mouth of the flower to foraging from the tube-base to rob.
Different demonstrators were used to indicate the presence of a robbing hole.
To explore the efficiency of information transfer from different demonstrators, we moved dead conspecific and heterospecific (carpenter bees and crickets) demonstrators towards this small hole to imitate nectar robbing.
Differences in the ability and speed of honey bees to imitate robbing behaviour were recorded for each demonstrator treatment.
Naïve honey bees switched to robbing behaviour more frequently when observing honey bee and carpenter bee demonstrators than when observing cricket demonstrators or controls that lacked a demonstrator.
However, honey bees switched to robbing behaviour significantly faster after observing conspecifics than after observing any other demonstrators.
This study demonstrates that honey bees can gather information from conspecifics and even heterospecifics while foraging, which can influence foraging behaviour such as flower robbing.
Utilizing foraging cues from other individuals may lead to conspecific and heterospecific learning.
“I can hardly doubt they [honeybees] were profiting by the workmanship and the example of the humble-bees: should this be verified, it will, I think, be a very instructive case of acquired knowledge in insects.
” Darwin 1841.

Related Results

Red mason bees cannot compete with honey bees for floral resources in a cage experiment
Red mason bees cannot compete with honey bees for floral resources in a cage experiment
AbstractIntensive beekeeping to mitigate crop pollination deficits and habitat loss may cause interspecific competition between bees. Studies show negative correlations between flo...
Pemberdayaan Petani Lebah Madu Desa Kutosari melalui Diversifikasi Madu
Pemberdayaan Petani Lebah Madu Desa Kutosari melalui Diversifikasi Madu
One of the advantages of Kutosari Village is that it is a village that produces pure honey, because many of its people work as honey bee farmers. Honey bee farmers use existing for...
Patch Size, Pollinator Behavior, and Pollinator Limitation in Catnip
Patch Size, Pollinator Behavior, and Pollinator Limitation in Catnip
We examined the effects of the patch size of catnip, Nepeta cataria, on pollinator visitation rates and pollinator limitation. The most important floral visitors were honey bees (A...
Determinants of Export Performance of Honey Industry in Ethiopia
Determinants of Export Performance of Honey Industry in Ethiopia
The study was conducted to identify the determinants of export performance of honey industry in Ethiopia and to establish trends of the Ethiopian honey export volume and honey expo...
British Food Journal Volume 47 Issue 9 1945
British Food Journal Volume 47 Issue 9 1945
The Hebrews of old were promised a land “flowing with milk and honey,” a description which, in the opinion of the biblical writer, expressed every desirable quality. Many excellent...
Botanical Origin Influence on Some Honey Physicochemical Characteristics and Antioxidant Properties
Botanical Origin Influence on Some Honey Physicochemical Characteristics and Antioxidant Properties
Five types of honey (multifloral, sunflower, linden, rapeseed, and acacia), from Southern Romania, were classified using chemometrics methods coupled with IR spectroscopy. The bota...
Physical, Chemical and Biological Characteristics of Sri Lankan Bee Honey Varieties
Physical, Chemical and Biological Characteristics of Sri Lankan Bee Honey Varieties
Objectives: Honey has abundant medicinal properties. It is formed by floral nectar, swaps of plants, and the secretions of bees. The current study determined the physical, chemical...

Back to Top