Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Efektivitas Kedudukan Direksi sebagai Personal Guarantee dalam Hal Kepailitan Perseroan Dikaitkan dengan Pembuktian Sederhana
View through CrossRef
One of the organs of a Limited Liability Company that often becomes a guarantor of a company’s debt is the Board of Directors. In practice, when a company can no longer carry out its obligations to pay debts, the guarantor is often bankrupted together with the debtor. Article 2 paragraph (1) jo. Article 8 paragraph (4) of the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law states that if the Debtor has two or more Creditors and has debts that are due and collectible, then the request for a bankruptcy statement must be granted if there are facts or circumstances that are proven simply. This research was conducted to examine the legal considerations of judges regarding the application of simple proof in Decision Number 20/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2022/PN.Niaga.Smg and what the implications are for the Directors of the company who act as a personal guarantee for their company’s debt. The results showed that the legal consideration of the majority of the Panel of Judges examining the case are not entirely in accordance with the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law, as the panel of judges only focused on fulfilling formal requirements without considering the principles of bankruptcy, which will have a broad impact on the parties involved. In addition, the juridical implications arising from the decision are that the Directors of the company as a personal guarantee remains personally responsible for the company’s debt, thus causing bankruptcy for him and the company.
Asosiasi Seni Desain dan Komunikasi Visual Indonesia
Title: Efektivitas Kedudukan Direksi sebagai Personal Guarantee dalam Hal Kepailitan Perseroan Dikaitkan dengan Pembuktian Sederhana
Description:
One of the organs of a Limited Liability Company that often becomes a guarantor of a company’s debt is the Board of Directors.
In practice, when a company can no longer carry out its obligations to pay debts, the guarantor is often bankrupted together with the debtor.
Article 2 paragraph (1) jo.
Article 8 paragraph (4) of the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law states that if the Debtor has two or more Creditors and has debts that are due and collectible, then the request for a bankruptcy statement must be granted if there are facts or circumstances that are proven simply.
This research was conducted to examine the legal considerations of judges regarding the application of simple proof in Decision Number 20/Pdt.
Sus-Bankruptcy/2022/PN.
Niaga.
Smg and what the implications are for the Directors of the company who act as a personal guarantee for their company’s debt.
The results showed that the legal consideration of the majority of the Panel of Judges examining the case are not entirely in accordance with the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law, as the panel of judges only focused on fulfilling formal requirements without considering the principles of bankruptcy, which will have a broad impact on the parties involved.
In addition, the juridical implications arising from the decision are that the Directors of the company as a personal guarantee remains personally responsible for the company’s debt, thus causing bankruptcy for him and the company.
Related Results
Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Abstract-Directors in a limited liability company can be likened to a life for the company. The Board of Directors in carrying out their duties in managing a limited liability comp...
TINDAKAN “ULTRA VIRES” DIREKSI DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA BAGI PERSEROAN TERBATAS
TINDAKAN “ULTRA VIRES” DIREKSI DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA BAGI PERSEROAN TERBATAS
Direksi menurut Undang-undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas memiliki dua kewenangan, yakni melakukan tindakan pengurusan perusahaan dan mewakili perseroan baik d...
Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Yang Dipailitkan
Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Yang Dipailitkan
Abstract
The right of encumbrance is one kind of guarantees that the debtor can promise to the creditor. In fu...
ANALISIS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DALAM MEMODERASI OPINI GOING CONCERN TERHADAP POTENSI KEPAILITAN
ANALISIS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DALAM MEMODERASI OPINI GOING CONCERN TERHADAP POTENSI KEPAILITAN
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis secara empiris pengaruh opini going concern terhadap potensi kepailitan, serta pengaruh GCG dalam memoderasi hub...
KEDUDUKAN KREDITOR SEPARATIS PADA PIUTANG JAMINAN KEBENDAAN TERHADAP PROSES PKPU
KEDUDUKAN KREDITOR SEPARATIS PADA PIUTANG JAMINAN KEBENDAAN TERHADAP PROSES PKPU
Kepailitan merupakan sita umum atas semua kekayaan debitor Pailit yang pengurusan dan pemberesannya dilakukan oleh kurator di bawah pengawasan Hakim Pengawas se-bagaimana diatur da...
ANALISIS HUKUM MENGUNGKAP PENYEBAB KEPAILITAN PT SRI REJEKI ISMAN
ANALISIS HUKUM MENGUNGKAP PENYEBAB KEPAILITAN PT SRI REJEKI ISMAN
Analisis Hukum atas kepailitan PT Sri Rejeki Isman dianalisa ini bertujuan untuk memahami dan menyelidiki faktor-faktor penyebab kepailitan dan implikasinya terhadap praktik manaje...
DEMENSI BUDAYA LOKAL DALAM TRADISI HAUL DAN MAULIDAN BAGI KOMUNITAS SEKARBELA MATARAM
DEMENSI BUDAYA LOKAL DALAM TRADISI HAUL DAN MAULIDAN BAGI KOMUNITAS SEKARBELA MATARAM
<p>Penelitian ini dilakukan di Kotamadya<br />Mataram Nusa Tenggara Barat. Sasaran<br />penelitian adalah suatu masyarakat lokal yang<br />menamakan dirinya...
Penerapan Prinsip Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Perseroan Terbatas
Penerapan Prinsip Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Perseroan Terbatas
AbstractA limited liability company is a legal subject capable of being responsible for the risks in carrying out its business. The principle of vicarious liability is the basis of...


