Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Preliminary investigation and invalidity of investigative actions
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Time limits for preliminary investigation and it’s duration is part of the right to a regular legal process, provided for by Article 42 of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania.1
The deadline of the preliminary investigation begins from the date that the name of the person whom the criminal offence is attributed to has been written in the register of notification of criminal offence and ends at the moment the investigations are completed with the relevant acts, the end of the investigations, etc. The duration of the preliminary investigations are different, depending on the prosecution, so in the general jurisdiction prosecution, the preliminary investigation period is 3 months and in the special jurisdiction prosecution it is 6 months. Extension of the preliminary investigation can be done periodically every 3 months, with a maximum term of 2 years, by the prosecutor of the concrete case. In addition to this 2-year period, the deadline can be extended by one more year by the General Prosecutor for the prosecutors of the general jurisdiction and by the Head of the Special Prosecution against Organized Crime and Corruption, for the prosecutors of this prosecution.
The goal of the legislator who has set deadlines for the preliminary investigation is not only the completion of the investigation within a reasonable period, but also the legality, validity of all acts and the usefulness of all the evidence obtained during this period of the preliminary investigation. In this way, the legislator has disciplined the preliminary investigation and its validity. Thus, in order for the investigation to be valid, all evidence and procedural acts must be done within this validity period.
But what happens if the investigative actions are carried out after the preliminary investigation period? What about the procedural acts that the prosecutor compiles at the end and beyond the deadline of the preliminary investigation, will they be valid and usable? These and other will be part of the analysis of this article.
Title: Preliminary investigation and invalidity of investigative actions
Description:
Abstract
Time limits for preliminary investigation and it’s duration is part of the right to a regular legal process, provided for by Article 42 of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania.
1
The deadline of the preliminary investigation begins from the date that the name of the person whom the criminal offence is attributed to has been written in the register of notification of criminal offence and ends at the moment the investigations are completed with the relevant acts, the end of the investigations, etc.
The duration of the preliminary investigations are different, depending on the prosecution, so in the general jurisdiction prosecution, the preliminary investigation period is 3 months and in the special jurisdiction prosecution it is 6 months.
Extension of the preliminary investigation can be done periodically every 3 months, with a maximum term of 2 years, by the prosecutor of the concrete case.
In addition to this 2-year period, the deadline can be extended by one more year by the General Prosecutor for the prosecutors of the general jurisdiction and by the Head of the Special Prosecution against Organized Crime and Corruption, for the prosecutors of this prosecution.
The goal of the legislator who has set deadlines for the preliminary investigation is not only the completion of the investigation within a reasonable period, but also the legality, validity of all acts and the usefulness of all the evidence obtained during this period of the preliminary investigation.
In this way, the legislator has disciplined the preliminary investigation and its validity.
Thus, in order for the investigation to be valid, all evidence and procedural acts must be done within this validity period.
But what happens if the investigative actions are carried out after the preliminary investigation period? What about the procedural acts that the prosecutor compiles at the end and beyond the deadline of the preliminary investigation, will they be valid and usable? These and other will be part of the analysis of this article.
Related Results
Ölüme Bağlı Tasarrufların İptali
Ölüme Bağlı Tasarrufların İptali
The basic sanction of invalidity for testamentary dispositions is regulated in Article 557 and the following three provisions of the Turkish Civil Code. Article 557 of the Turkish ...
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND COERCION DURING INVESTIGATIVE (SEARCH) ACTIONS
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND COERCION DURING INVESTIGATIVE (SEARCH) ACTIONS
The article examines the issues of ensuring the efficiency of criminal proceedings, and distinguishes investigative (search) actions which may be carried out in a person's home or ...
Sāṃkhya on the Validity (prāmāṇya) and Invalidity (aprāmāṇya) of Cognition
Sāṃkhya on the Validity (prāmāṇya) and Invalidity (aprāmāṇya) of Cognition
One of the well-known polemics of Indian thought, in which many darśanas participated, is concerned with the problem of the validity (prāmāṇya) and invalidity (aprāmāṇya) of cogni...
The Features of the Content and Subject Composition of Settlement Agreements in Cases of Invalidity of Transactions
The Features of the Content and Subject Composition of Settlement Agreements in Cases of Invalidity of Transactions
Settlement agreements in civil and arbitration proceedings are one of the most convenient and effective ways to resolve disputes arising between participants in civil legal relatio...
Pola Pencarian Data Investigasi di Media Online
Pola Pencarian Data Investigasi di Media Online
Abstract. In investigative journalism work, there are three general forms of investigative methods, namely, related to the work of investigating documents, as well as investigation...
Some Problems of Investigative Experiment Regulatory Framework
Some Problems of Investigative Experiment Regulatory Framework
The paper analyzes the investigative experiment regulatory issues. It is stated that because of the extreme conciseness of legal regulation, many aspects are based on scientific de...
TACTICAL DECISIONS MAKING IN THEORY OF CRIMINALISTICS: PROBLEMS OF ACCEPTANCE THEIRS
TACTICAL DECISIONS MAKING IN THEORY OF CRIMINALISTICS: PROBLEMS OF ACCEPTANCE THEIRS
This article considers the stages of making tactical decisions whole determining circumstances of a criminal offense, which are logically interrelated between one another. Author p...
An Invalidity Strategy against Patent Barriers: Evidence from Chinese Enterprises
An Invalidity Strategy against Patent Barriers: Evidence from Chinese Enterprises
Abstract
In the global trade market, patents evolve into strategic barriers to block overseas competitors. Patent invalidity proceeding, the acknowledged countermeasure, is...

