Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Some Problems of Investigative Experiment Regulatory Framework
View through CrossRef
The paper analyzes the investigative experiment regulatory issues. It is stated that because of the extreme conciseness of legal regulation, many aspects are based on scientific developments. The purpose of the investigative experiment is to establish whether the algorithm of trace formation as a result of the experimental actions performed by the investigator corresponds to the mechanism that took place when committing a criminal act.The conditions of the investigative experiment are highlighted: 1) exclusion of danger to the health and life of its participants; 2) similarity of the situation with that which took place during the checked event; 3) voluntary participation; 4) the inadmissibility of reproducing a crime. The cases in which the participation of the person who committed the act in the course of the crime is required (to check individual characteristics and skills), and in which the replacement of this person with a stand-in is possible (to check the fundamental possibility of a phenomenon that is not related to individual qualities) are differentiated.The main participant of the investigative experiment, if his personal characteristics are checked, must have the procedural status of a witness, victim, suspect or accused. Specific participants of the investigative experiment are distinguished: the understudy and the assistant, who are not given an independent procedural status. Proposals for participation in the investigative experiment of all persons who are in one way or another concerned with the results of experimental actions are considered. Such proposals are unrealistic, instead, it is proposed to use a video recording to record the progress of the investigative experiment, which can be demonstrated to other participants in the proceedings.Taking into account the legal nature of the investigative experiment, it is stated that it is impossible to seize material objects directly within the framework of this investigative action; they can be seized after its completion, during inspection or seizure.
Title: Some Problems of Investigative Experiment Regulatory Framework
Description:
The paper analyzes the investigative experiment regulatory issues.
It is stated that because of the extreme conciseness of legal regulation, many aspects are based on scientific developments.
The purpose of the investigative experiment is to establish whether the algorithm of trace formation as a result of the experimental actions performed by the investigator corresponds to the mechanism that took place when committing a criminal act.
The conditions of the investigative experiment are highlighted: 1) exclusion of danger to the health and life of its participants; 2) similarity of the situation with that which took place during the checked event; 3) voluntary participation; 4) the inadmissibility of reproducing a crime.
The cases in which the participation of the person who committed the act in the course of the crime is required (to check individual characteristics and skills), and in which the replacement of this person with a stand-in is possible (to check the fundamental possibility of a phenomenon that is not related to individual qualities) are differentiated.
The main participant of the investigative experiment, if his personal characteristics are checked, must have the procedural status of a witness, victim, suspect or accused.
Specific participants of the investigative experiment are distinguished: the understudy and the assistant, who are not given an independent procedural status.
Proposals for participation in the investigative experiment of all persons who are in one way or another concerned with the results of experimental actions are considered.
Such proposals are unrealistic, instead, it is proposed to use a video recording to record the progress of the investigative experiment, which can be demonstrated to other participants in the proceedings.
Taking into account the legal nature of the investigative experiment, it is stated that it is impossible to seize material objects directly within the framework of this investigative action; they can be seized after its completion, during inspection or seizure.
Related Results
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND COERCION DURING INVESTIGATIVE (SEARCH) ACTIONS
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND COERCION DURING INVESTIGATIVE (SEARCH) ACTIONS
The article examines the issues of ensuring the efficiency of criminal proceedings, and distinguishes investigative (search) actions which may be carried out in a person's home or ...
Pola Pencarian Data Investigasi di Media Online
Pola Pencarian Data Investigasi di Media Online
Abstract. In investigative journalism work, there are three general forms of investigative methods, namely, related to the work of investigating documents, as well as investigation...
Evaluation of investigative reports on electronic websites in the Kurdistan Region
Evaluation of investigative reports on electronic websites in the Kurdistan Region
The subject of this study is )Evaluation of investigative reports on electronic websites in the Kurdistan region(, which is a current and important topic in media science, and it h...
Speciālās izmeklēšanas darbības vakar, šodien un rīt
Speciālās izmeklēšanas darbības vakar, šodien un rīt
The section of the monograph titled “Special Investigative Measures: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow” is aimed at examination of the complex development and evolution of special inve...
TACTICAL DECISIONS MAKING IN THEORY OF CRIMINALISTICS: PROBLEMS OF ACCEPTANCE THEIRS
TACTICAL DECISIONS MAKING IN THEORY OF CRIMINALISTICS: PROBLEMS OF ACCEPTANCE THEIRS
This article considers the stages of making tactical decisions whole determining circumstances of a criminal offense, which are logically interrelated between one another. Author p...
Pengaruh Audit Investigasi Terhadap Pencegahan Dan Pengungkapan Fraud
Pengaruh Audit Investigasi Terhadap Pencegahan Dan Pengungkapan Fraud
This study discusses the importance of investigative audits in uncovering fraud and corruption in Indonesia. Investigative audits are conducted using specific approaches, procedure...
Are investigative centres independent?
Are investigative centres independent?
Investigative journalism has brought both advantages and challenges for journalism in Malawi. As a developing country, Malawi has benefited immensely from this type of journalism. ...
A Failed Experiment - Investigative Detention: Ten Years Later
A Failed Experiment - Investigative Detention: Ten Years Later
Ten years ago, the Ontario Court of Appeal introduced the investigative detention power to Canada with its decision in R. v. Simpson. After providing some necessary background abou...

