Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Case-matched Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
View through CrossRef
Background:
The laparoscopic approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is technically demanding, but may offer benefits over open surgery [open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD)]. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of these 2 approaches at a tertiary cancer center from the Middle East.
Materials and Methods:
Fifty consecutive patients who underwent LPD (n=12) and OPD (n=38) between 2015 and 2018 were considered. One surgeon performed LPD for “all comers,” while 3 other surgeons performed open surgery. Patients were randomly matched on a 1:2 basis for pathology (benign vs. malignant), malignancy size (±1 cm), and whether the pancreatic duct was dilated (>3 mm).
Results:
Six patients were excluded, leaving 44 patients, of whom 33 were matched (LPD n=11, OPD n=22). The groups were comparable for age (57 vs. 63 y, P=0.123) and sex distribution (female; 55% vs. 45%, P=0.721), tumor size (3 cm in each group), frequency of pancreatic duct dilatation (45% in each group), and malignant pathology (82% in each group). There were no conversions to open surgery. Although the operating time for LPD was significantly longer (680 vs. 313 min, P<0.0001), LPD was associated with significantly shorter primary (4.7 vs. 7.8 d, P<0.0001) and total hospital stay that included readmissions (4.7 vs. 8.9 d, P<0.0001). There were no significant differences in blood loss (200 vs. 325 mL, P=0.082), overall complication rate (36.4% vs. 59.1%, P=0.282), or clinically significant complications (9.1% vs. 22.2%, P=0.643) and readmissions (0 vs. 4 patients). In patients with malignant disease, there were no differences with regard to the number of lymph nodes retrieved (18 vs. 12, P=0.095) and frequency of R0 resections (77.8% in each group).
Conclusion:
In experienced hands, the laparoscopic approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy seems to offer advantages over open surgery in terms of reduction in hospital stay while maintaining an equivalent oncologic resection.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: A Case-matched Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Description:
Background:
The laparoscopic approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is technically demanding, but may offer benefits over open surgery [open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD)].
The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of these 2 approaches at a tertiary cancer center from the Middle East.
Materials and Methods:
Fifty consecutive patients who underwent LPD (n=12) and OPD (n=38) between 2015 and 2018 were considered.
One surgeon performed LPD for “all comers,” while 3 other surgeons performed open surgery.
Patients were randomly matched on a 1:2 basis for pathology (benign vs.
malignant), malignancy size (±1 cm), and whether the pancreatic duct was dilated (>3 mm).
Results:
Six patients were excluded, leaving 44 patients, of whom 33 were matched (LPD n=11, OPD n=22).
The groups were comparable for age (57 vs.
63 y, P=0.
123) and sex distribution (female; 55% vs.
45%, P=0.
721), tumor size (3 cm in each group), frequency of pancreatic duct dilatation (45% in each group), and malignant pathology (82% in each group).
There were no conversions to open surgery.
Although the operating time for LPD was significantly longer (680 vs.
313 min, P<0.
0001), LPD was associated with significantly shorter primary (4.
7 vs.
7.
8 d, P<0.
0001) and total hospital stay that included readmissions (4.
7 vs.
8.
9 d, P<0.
0001).
There were no significant differences in blood loss (200 vs.
325 mL, P=0.
082), overall complication rate (36.
4% vs.
59.
1%, P=0.
282), or clinically significant complications (9.
1% vs.
22.
2%, P=0.
643) and readmissions (0 vs.
4 patients).
In patients with malignant disease, there were no differences with regard to the number of lymph nodes retrieved (18 vs.
12, P=0.
095) and frequency of R0 resections (77.
8% in each group).
Conclusion:
In experienced hands, the laparoscopic approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy seems to offer advantages over open surgery in terms of reduction in hospital stay while maintaining an equivalent oncologic resection.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Safety and hazards of middle-life robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
Safety and hazards of middle-life robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
Abstract
Pancreaticoduodenectomy procedures were performed early in young individuals, with a few days about the risk and survival after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Ou...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pediatric Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pediatric Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly
Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has rapidly evolved into the technique of choice compared with open splenectomy (OS) because of the advantages of the minimally invasive approach. Spl...
Navigation with laparoscopic ultrasound during fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a single-centre retrospective case control study
Navigation with laparoscopic ultrasound during fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a single-centre retrospective case control study
Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered as the gold standard treatment for cholecystolithiasis. The critical view of safety is a generally accepted ...
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a surgical emergency that is amongst the most frequently performed all over the globe, with open appendectomy being the conventional treatment. ...
OUTCOME OF OPEN REPAIR VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH DUODENAL ULCER PERFORATION
OUTCOME OF OPEN REPAIR VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH DUODENAL ULCER PERFORATION
Background: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a life-threatening surgical emergency. With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic repair has emerged as an altern...

