Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Individual Differences in Receptivity to Scientific Bullshit

View through CrossRef
Pseudo profound bullshit receptivity is the tendency to perceive meaning in important-sounding, nonsense statements. To understand how bullshit receptivity differs across domains, we developed a scale to measure scientific bullshit receptivity—the tendency to perceive truthfulness in nonsensical scientific statements. Across three studies (total N = 1,948), scientific bullshit receptivity was positively correlated with pseudo profound bullshit receptivity. Both types of bullshit receptivity were positively correlated with belief in science, conservative political beliefs, and faith in intuition. However, compared to pseudo profound bullshit receptivity, scientific bullshit receptivity was more strongly correlated with belief in science, and less strongly correlated with conservative political beliefs and faith in intuition. Finally, scientific literacy moderated the relationship the two types of bullshit receptivity; the correlation between the two types of receptivity was weaker for individuals scoring high in scientific literacy.
Title: Individual Differences in Receptivity to Scientific Bullshit
Description:
Pseudo profound bullshit receptivity is the tendency to perceive meaning in important-sounding, nonsense statements.
To understand how bullshit receptivity differs across domains, we developed a scale to measure scientific bullshit receptivity—the tendency to perceive truthfulness in nonsensical scientific statements.
Across three studies (total N = 1,948), scientific bullshit receptivity was positively correlated with pseudo profound bullshit receptivity.
Both types of bullshit receptivity were positively correlated with belief in science, conservative political beliefs, and faith in intuition.
However, compared to pseudo profound bullshit receptivity, scientific bullshit receptivity was more strongly correlated with belief in science, and less strongly correlated with conservative political beliefs and faith in intuition.
Finally, scientific literacy moderated the relationship the two types of bullshit receptivity; the correlation between the two types of receptivity was weaker for individuals scoring high in scientific literacy.

Related Results

Police Bullshit
Police Bullshit
The police say brutal things. Research has documented how officers, when amongst themselves, talk about people in derogatory ways or openly fantasize about the use of excessive vio...
Endometrial Receptivity Failure? Crossing Barrier by Ayurveda!! A Case Report
Endometrial Receptivity Failure? Crossing Barrier by Ayurveda!! A Case Report
Infertility is a medical condition that indicates a couple failed to conceive in one year. A victimized couple not only suffers from social issues but also economic and psychosomat...
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE ORGANIZATION OF SCIENTIFIC WORK IN THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF THE NATIONAL GUARD OF UKRAINE
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE ORGANIZATION OF SCIENTIFIC WORK IN THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF THE NATIONAL GUARD OF UKRAINE
The main principles of management of the scientific and pedagogical (scientific) team in a higher military educational institution, which ensure the coherence and efficiency of the...
Breathing, Cinema and Other “Nobjects” in Camille Vidal-Naquet’s Sauvage
Breathing, Cinema and Other “Nobjects” in Camille Vidal-Naquet’s Sauvage
This article examines the breathing and breathless body in Camille-Vidal Naquet’s Sauvage (2018). Respiration has been characterised by Peter Sloterdijk, in the first volume of his...
Effect and mechanism of Jinfeng Pills on the receptivity of thin endometrium in rats
Effect and mechanism of Jinfeng Pills on the receptivity of thin endometrium in rats
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of Jinfeng Pills on the receptivity of a thin endometrium in rats and elucidate its mechanism of action. ...

Back to Top