Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Be Careful! That is Probably Bullshit! Review of <em> Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World </em> by Carl T. Bergstrom and Jevin D. West
View through CrossRef
Bergstrom, C. T., & West, J. D. 2021. Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World. NY: Random House. 336 pp. ISBN 978-0525509189
The authors provide a journey through the numerical bullshit that surrounds our daily lives. Each chapter has multiple examples of specific types of bullshit that each of us experience on any given day. Most importantly, information on how to identify bullshit and refute it are provided so that reader finishes the book with a set of skills to be a more engaged and critical interpreter of information. The writing has a quick and lively pace that a wide audience will enjoy.
Title: Be Careful! That is Probably Bullshit! Review of <em> Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World </em> by Carl T. Bergstrom and Jevin D. West
Description:
Bergstrom, C.
T.
, & West, J.
D.
2021.
Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World.
NY: Random House.
336 pp.
ISBN 978-0525509189
The authors provide a journey through the numerical bullshit that surrounds our daily lives.
Each chapter has multiple examples of specific types of bullshit that each of us experience on any given day.
Most importantly, information on how to identify bullshit and refute it are provided so that reader finishes the book with a set of skills to be a more engaged and critical interpreter of information.
The writing has a quick and lively pace that a wide audience will enjoy.
Related Results
Green skepticism: review and research agenda
Green skepticism: review and research agenda
PurposeDespite a growing interest in investigating green skepticism, there has been a paucity of effort in synthesizing green skepticism research. This study aims to synthesize ext...
Individual Differences in Receptivity to Scientific Bullshit
Individual Differences in Receptivity to Scientific Bullshit
Pseudo profound bullshit receptivity is the tendency to perceive meaning in important-sounding, nonsense statements. To understand how bullshit receptivity differs across domains, ...
Professional Skepticism: Practitioners’ Perceptions And Training Practices
Professional Skepticism: Practitioners’ Perceptions And Training Practices
While regulators criticize auditors for lacking appropriate professional skepticism (SEC, 2010, 2013; PCAOB, 2012), auditing standards lack a clear, consistent definition (Nelson, ...
Falling for Bullshit
Falling for Bullshit
Abstract
“Bullshit receptivity” is a newly validated psychological construct defined as the tendency to perceive meaning in statements that sound profound on the sur...
The impact of perceived calling on work outcomes in a nursing context: The role of career commitment and living one’s calling
The impact of perceived calling on work outcomes in a nursing context: The role of career commitment and living one’s calling
AbstractThe current study examined the impact of perceived calling on nurses’ organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, workplace deviant behavior, and turnov...
Strategies of Understanding Skepticism in Contemporary Analytic Epistemology
Strategies of Understanding Skepticism in Contemporary Analytic Epistemology
The paper presents a review of the most significant reference points in the discourse around skepticism within contemporary analytic epistemology. The text examines the primary str...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Descartes and Ancient Skepticism: Reheated Cabbage?
Descartes and Ancient Skepticism: Reheated Cabbage?
Chapter 13 considers a variety of ways in which Pyrrhonian skepticism has been thought to differ from Cartesian skepticism: that is, from the sort of skepticism Descartes describes...

